Viewing the future through a warped lens: Why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 169-203

  Epper, Thomas ^a   Fehr Duda, Helga ^a   Bruhin, Adrian ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Hyperbolic discounting; Institutionally generated uncertainty; Probability weighting; Risk preferences; Time preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 81855201818     PISSN: 08955646     EISSN: 15730476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-011-9129-x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46(11), 1497-1512.
2. Abdellaoui, M., Attema, A., & Bleichrodt, H. (2010). Intertemporal tradeoffs for gains and losses: An experimental measurement of discounted utility. Economic Journal, 120, 845-866.
3. Abdellaoui, M., Diecidue, E., & Öncüler, A. (2011). Risk preferences at different time periods: An experimental investigation. Management Science, 57(5), 975-987.
4. Ahlbrecht, M., & Weber, M. (1997). An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Science, 43, 813-826.
5. Ainslie G.
6. Allais, M. (1953). L'Extension des Theories de l'Equilibre Economique General et du Rendement Social au Cas du Risque. Econometrica, 21(2), 269-290.
7. Anderhub, V., Güth, W., Gneezy, U., & Sonsino, D. (2001). On the interaction of risk and time preferences: An experimental study. German Economic Review, 2(3), 239-253.
8. Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M., & Rutström, E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76(3), 583-618.
9. Anderson, L., & Stafford, S. (2009). Individual decision-making experiments with risk and intertemporal choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38, 51-72.
10. Baucells, M., & Heukamp, F. (2010). Common ratio using delay. Theory and Decision, 68, 149-158.
11. Benjamin, D., Sebastian, A., & Shapiro, J. (2006). Who is 'behavioral'? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Harvard University mimeo.
12. Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., & Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from deciions: An experimental study. Management Science, 35(3), 270-284.
13. Bruhin, A., Fehr-Duda, H., & Epper, T. (2010). Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica, 78(4), 1375-1412.
14. Caplin, A., & Leahy, J. (2001). Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 55-79.
15. Chesson, H., & Viscusi, W. (2000). The heterogeneity of time-risk tradeoffs. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 251-258.
16. Chesson, H., & Viscusi, W. (2003). Commonalities in time and ambiguity aversion for long-term risks. Theory and Decision, 54, 57-71.
17. Coble, K., & Lusk, J. (2010). At the nexus of risk and time preferences: An experimental investigation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41, 67-79.
18. Coller, M., & Williams, M. (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics, 2, 107-127.
19. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2007). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238-1260.
20. Eckel, C., Johnson, C., & Montmarquette, C. (2004). Saving decisions of the working poor: Short- and long-term horizons. In Research in experimental economics (Vol. 10, pp. 219-260). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
21. Fehr-Duda, H., Bruhin, A., Epper, T., & Schubert, R. (2010). Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(2), 147-180.
22. Fehr-Duda, H., de Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60, 283-313.
23. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.
24. Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest as determined by impatience to spend income and opportunity to invest it. New York: Macmillan.
25. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42.
26. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
27. Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129-166.
28. Hagen, O. (1972). Towards a positive theory of preference under risk. In M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility and the Allais paradox (pp. 271-302). Dordrecht, Boston.
29. Halevy, Y. (2008). Strotz meets Allais: Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect. American Economic Review, 98(3), 1145-1162.
30. Harless, D., & Camerer, C. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica, 62(6), 1251-1289.
31. Hey, J. D., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291-1326.
32. Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
33. Kachelmeier, S., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People's Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82(5), 1120-1141.
34. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
35. Karmarkar, U. S. (1979). Subjectively weighted utility and the Allais paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 67-72.
36. Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 287-297.
37. Kirby, K. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 126(1), 54-70.
38. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443-477.
39. Lattimore, P., Baker, J., & Witte, A. D. (1992). The influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17, 377-400.
40. Leigh, J. (1986). Accounting for tastes: Correlates of risk and time preferences. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 9(1), 17-31.
41. Myerson, J., & Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 263-276.
42. Myerson, J., Green, L., Hanson, J., Holt, D., & Estle, S. (2003). Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: Processes and traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 619-635.
43. Noussair, C., & Wu, P. (2006). Risk tolerance in the present and the future: An experimental study. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 401-412.
44. Onay, S., & Öncüler, A. (2007). Intertemporal choice under timing risk: An experimental approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34, 99-121.
45. Patak, M., & Reynolds, B. (2007). Question-based assessment of delay discounting: Do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards? Addictive Behaviors, 32, 351-357.
46. Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66(3), 497-527.
47. Prelec, D. (2000). Compound invariant weighting functions in prospect theory. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 67-92). Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
48. Prelec, D. (2004). Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and 'Hyperbolic' Discounting. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 511-532.
49. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37(7), 770-786.
50. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323-343.
51. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233-244.
52. Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Sciences, 12(3), 185-190.
53. Saito, K. (2011). A relationship between risk and time preferences. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2271-2275.
54. Segal, U. (1987). Some remarks on Quiggin's anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8, 145-154.
55. Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1989). Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses. Annals of Operations Research, 19, 79-102.
56. Takahashi, T., Ikeda, K., Hasegawa, T., & Greene, A. (2007). A hyperbolic decay of subjective probability of obtaining delayed rewards. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(52).
57. Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201-207.
58. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
59. Wakker, P. (1994). Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision, 36, 1-44.
60. Wakker, P. (2008). Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family. Health Economics, 17, 1329-1344.
61. Walther, H. (2003). Normal-randomness expected utility, time preference and emotional distortions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 253-266.
62. Walther, H. (2010). Anomalies in intertemporal choice, time-dependent uncertainty and expected utility-A common approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 114-130.
63. Weber, B., & Chapman, G. (2005). The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 104-118.
64. Wu, G. (1999). Anxiety and decision making with delayed resolution of uncertainty. Theory and Decision, 46, 159-198.