Normal-randomness expected utility, time preference and emotional distortions

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 253-266

  Walther, Herbert ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Decision making; Non expected; Uncertainty; Utility

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042342620     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00005-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allais M. Le Comportement de l'homme Rational Devant le Risque Econometrica 21 1953 503-546
2. Anderhub V. Gneezy U. Güth W. Sonsino D. On the interaction of risk and time preferences: an experimental study German Economic Review 23 2001 239-253
3. Arrow, K.J., 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
4. Biswas, T., 1997. Decision-Making Under Uncertainty. Macmillan, London.
5. Bell D.E. Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty Operations Research 33 1985 1-27
6. Brickman P. Coates D. Janoff-Bulman R. Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 1968 917-927
7. Cubitt R.P. Starmer C. Sugden R. Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: an experimental investigation Economic Journal 108 1998 1363-1381
8. Conlisk J. The utility of gambling Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6 1993 225-275
9. Friedman M. Savage L.J. The utility analysis of choice involving risk Journal of Political Economy 56 1948 279-304
10. Fennema, H., Wakker, P., 1996. An explanation and characterization for the buying of lotteries. In: Rios, S. (Ed.), Decision Theory and Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 163-167.
11. Gilbert D. Wilson T.D. Pinel E.C. Blumberg S.J. Wheatley T.P. Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 1998 617-638
12. Gerstein A. et al., 1999. Gambling impact and behavior study. Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
13. Gul F. A theory of disappointment aversion Econometrica 593 1991 667-686
14. Kachelmeier S.J. Shehata M. Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: experimental evidence from the People's Republic of China American Economic Review 82 1994 1120-1141
15. Lichtenstein S. Slovic P. Reversal of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 1971 46-55
16. Loomes G. Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Economic Journal 92 1982 805-824
17. Machina M.J. Choice under uncertainty: problems solved and unsolved Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 Summer 1987 121-154
18. Pope, R.E., 1999. Reconciliation with the utility of chance by elaborated outcomes destroys the axiomatic basis of expected utility. Discussion Paper Series B, University of Bonn, February.
19. Pope R.E. Towards a more precise decision framework a separation of the negative utility of chance from diminishing marginal utility and the preference for safety Theory and Decision 393 1995 241-265
20. Pratt J.W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large Econometrica 32 1964 122-136
21. Prelec D. The probability weighting function Econometrica 66 1998 497-527
22. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 1982 323-343
23. Quiggin, J., 1993. Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.