Selecting methods for the analysis of reliance on automation

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 287-291

  Wang, Lu ^a   Jamieson, Greg A ^b   Hollands, Justin G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION;

ANALYSIS METHOD; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; META ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL LEVEL;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 69249148925     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Analla, T. (2001). A fire alarm lesson from Seton Hall: SJSU officials pushing safety after dorm blaze here. Spartan Daily. Retrieved May 22, 2008, from http://media.www.thespartan daily.com/media/storage/paper852/news/2001/05/ 15/Campus News/A. Fire. Alarm. Lesson. From. Seton. Hall-1501630.shtml.
2. Bagheri, N., & Jamieson, G. A. (2004). The impact of contextrelated reliability on automation failure detection and scanning behaviour. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 212-217).
3. Bagheri. N. (2004). The effect of automation reliability on operator monitoring. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19 (6), 775-779.
5. Biros, D. P., Daly, M., & Gunsch, G. (2004). The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13 (2), 173-189.
6. Bisantz, A. M., & Pritchett, A. R. (2003). Measuring judgment in complex, dynamic environments: A lens model analysis of collision detection behavior. Human Factors, 45, 266-280.
7. nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Dixon, S. R., & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: A reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48 (3), 474-486.
9. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L., Pomranky, R., Peterson, S., & Beck, H. (2001). Automation reliance on a combat identification system. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 532-536). Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10. Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2007). Reliance on automation as a function of expectation of reliability, cost of verification, and age. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 6-10). Baltimore, MD: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11. Galster, S. M., Bolia, R. S., Roe, M. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Effects of automated cueing on decision implementation in a visual search task. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 321-325). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12. Green D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York Wiley.
13. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46 (1), 50-80.
14. Maltz, M., & Meyer, J. (2001). Use of warnings in an attentionally demanding detection task. Human Factors, 43 (2), 217-226.
15. Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (2003). New alternative methods of analyzing human behavior in cued target acquisition. Human factors, 45 (2), 281 (15) - 296.
16. Manzey, D., Bahner, E., & Hueper, A. (2006). Misuse of automated aids in process control: Complacency, automation bias and possible training interventions. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 220-224). San Francisco, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human factors, 43 (4), 563-572.
18. Moray, N., T. Inagaki (2000). Attention and complacency. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1 (4), 354-365.
19. Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (1998). Automation bias: Decision making and performance in hightech cockpits. The International journal of aviation psychology, 8 (1), 47-63.
20. Murrell, G. A. (1977). Combination of evidence in a probabilistic visual search and detection task. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 3-18.
21. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
22. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
23. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.