Beyond identity: Incorporating system reliability information into an automated combat identification system

Human Factors

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 338-355

  Neyedli, Heather F ^a   Hollands, Justin G ^b   Jamieson, Greg A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

automation; combat identification; decision aids; integrated displays; proximity compatibility principle; reliance; signal detection theory; simulation; system reliability; visual attention; visual displays

Indexed keywords

COMBAT IDENTIFICATION; COMPATIBILITY PRINCIPLES; DECISION AIDS; INTEGRATED DISPLAYS; RELIANCE; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY; SIMULATION; SYSTEM RELIABILITY; VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL DISPLAY;

AUTOMATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTS; INTEGRATION; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL DETECTION;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; MILITARY PHENOMENA; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WAR;

ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MILITARY SCIENCE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960793080     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720811413767     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ariely D.. Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science. 2001 ; 12: 157-162 (Pubitemid 33653525)
2. Bainbridge L.. Ironies of automation. Automatica. 1983 ; 19: 775-779
3. Brand J. L., Orenstein H. B.. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?. Ergonomics. 1998 ; 41: 286-301 (Pubitemid 28105143)
4. Chong S., Treisman A.. Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research. 2003 ; 43: 393-404 (Pubitemid 36106463)
5. Chong S., Treisman A.. Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics. 2004 ; 66: 1282-1294
6. Coury B. G., Boulette M. D., Smith R. A.. Effect of uncertainty and diagnosticity on classification of multidimensional data with integral and separable displays of system status. Human Factors. 1989 ; 31: 551-569 (Pubitemid 20115245)
7. Dzindolet M. T., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P., Dawe L. A., Anderson B. W. Military Psychology. 2001: 147-164.
8. Feldman-Stewart D., Brundage M. D., Zotov V.. Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: Judgments of gist in treatment decisions. Medical Decision Making. 2007 ; 27: 34-43 (Pubitemid 46068150)
9. Finger R., Bisantz A. M.. Utilizing graphical formats to convey uncertainty in a decision making task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2002 ; 3: 1-25
10. Hollands J. G., Spence I.. Judgments of change and proportion in graphical perception. Human Factors. 1992 ; 35: 313-334
11. Hollands J. G., Spence I.. Judging proportion with graphs: The summation model. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1998 ; 12: 173-190 (Pubitemid 128531636)
12. Howell D. C. Statistical methods for psychology. 3 rd ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press ; 1992 :
13. Karsh R., Walrath J. D., Swoboda J. C., Pillalamarri K. The effect of battlefield combat identification system information on target identification time and errors in a simulated tank engagement task. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Laboratory ; 1995 :
14. Lee J. D., See K. A.. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 50-80 (Pubitemid 44490367)
15. Macmillan N. A., Creelman C. D. Detection theory: A user's guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press ; 1991 :
16. Maltz M., Shinar D.. New alternative methods in analyzing human behavior in cued target acquisition. Human Factors. 2003 ; 45: 281-295 (Pubitemid 37087496)
17. Parasuraman R., Riley V.. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors. 1997 ; 39: 230-253
18. Rovira E., McGarry K., Parasuraman R.. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors. 2007 ; 49: 76-87 (Pubitemid 46175383)
19. Salthouse T. A., Ellis C. L.. Determinants of eye-fixation duration. American Journal of Psychology. 1980 ; 93: 207-234
20. Salvucci D. D.. A model of eye movements and visual attention. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Modeling ; 2000 ; 2000. 252.
21. Sanquist T. F., Minsk B., Parasuraman R.. Cognitive engineering in radiation screening for homeland security. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2008 ; 2: 204-219
22. See J. E., Howe S. R., Warm J. S., Dember W. N.. Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin. 1995 ; 117: 230-249
23. Sherman K.. Combat identification system for the dismounted soldier. Proceedings of SPIE 2000: Digitization of the Battlespace V and Battlefield Biomedical Technologies II ; 2000 ; 2000. 135.
24. Sherman K. B.. Combat ID coming for individual soldiers. Journal of Electronic Defense. 2002 ; 25: 34-35
25. Skitka L. J., Mosier K. L., Burdick M.. Does automation bias decision-making?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 1999 ; 51: 991-1006 (Pubitemid 30509730)
26. Sorkin R. D., Woods D. D.. Systems with human monitors: A signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction. 1985 ; 1: 49-75
27. Spence I., Lewandowsky S.. Displaying proportions and percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991 ; 5: 61-77
28. Wang L., Jamieson G. A., Hollands J. G.. Improving reliability awareness to support appropriate trust and reliance on individual combat identification systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting ; 2008 ; 2008. 292.
29. Wang L., Jamieson G. A., Hollands J. G.. Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system: The role of aid reliability and reliability disclosure. Human Factors. 2009 ; 51: 281-291
30. Wickens C. D., Carswell C. M.. The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors. 1995 ; 37: 473-494 (Pubitemid 26012113)
31. Wickens C. D., Dixon S.. The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2007 ; 8: 201-212
32. Wickens C. D., Hollands J. G. Engineering psychology and human performance. 3 rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall ; 2000 :
33. Young C. J. Dispatches: Lessons Learned for Soldiers. 2005 :