Delegating to automation: Performance, complacency and bias effects under non-optimal conditions

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 95-99

  Miller, Christopher A ^a   Shaw, Tyler ^b   Emfield, Adam ^b   Hamell, Joshua ^a   De Visser, Ewart ^b   Parasuraman, Raja ^b   Musliner, David ^a  

^a SMART INFORMATION FLOW TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIAS EFFECTS; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS;

ERGONOMICS; EXPERIMENTS; OPTIMIZATION;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 81855193758     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Endsley, M., & Kiris, E. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37, 381-394.
2. Fern, L., & Shively, R. J. (2009). A comparison of varying levels of automation on the supervisory control of multiple UASs. In Proceedings of AUVSI's Unmanned Systems, North America, Washington, D.C.
3. Miller, C.A., Parasuraman, R. (2007). Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: Delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors, 49, 57-75. (Pubitemid 46175382)
4. Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., Squire, P., Furukawa, H., & Miller, C. (2005). A flexible delegation interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple autonomous robots: Empirical studies with RoboFlag. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 35, 481-493. (Pubitemid 40986431)
5. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Singh, I. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency." Int. Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
6. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
7. Rovira, E., McGarry, K., Parasuraman, R. (2007). Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors, 49, 76-87. (Pubitemid 46175383)
8. Shaw, T., Emfield, A., Garcia, A., deVisser, E., Miller, C., Parasuraman, R., and Fern, L. (2010). Evaluating the Benefits and Potential Costs of Automation Delegation for Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs. In Proceedings of the 54th Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1498-1502.
9. Sheridan, T. (2002). Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. HFES/Wiley; Santa Monica, CA.