Evaluating the benefits and potential costs of automation delegation for supervisory control of multiple UAVs

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1498-1502

  Shaw, Tyler ^a   Emfield, Adam ^a   Garcia, Andre ^a   De Visser, Ewart ^a   Miller, Chris ^b   Parasuraman, Raja ^a   Fern, Lisa ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ANTENNAS; COSTS; ERGONOMICS; FLEXIBLE DISPLAYS; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

AERIAL VEHICLE; DISPLAY SYSTEM; FLEXIBLE CONTROL; INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION; PRIMARY TASK; SECONDARY TASKS; SIMULATION SYSTEMS; SUPERVISORY CONTROL; THREE-LEVEL; VEHICLE SIMULATORS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 79952923922     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193121005401930     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Campbell, M. D'Andrea, R. Schneider, D., Chaudhry, A., Waydo, S., Sullivan, J., Vevcrka, J., & Klochko, A. (2003). RoboFlag games using Systems based hierarchical control, Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Denver, Colorado
2. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., and Chang, D. (2005) Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Human Factors, 47, 479-487.
3. Endsley, M., & Kiris, E. (1995). The out-of-the-loop perfonnance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37, 381-394.
4. Fem, L., & Shively, R. J. (2009). A comparison of varying levels of automation on the supervisory control of multiple UASs. In Proceedings of AUVSI's Unmanned Systems, North America, Washington, D.C.
5. Kirlik, A. (1993). Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: Why an "aid" can (and should) go unused. Human Factors, 35, 221-242.
6. Miller, C., Goldman, R., Funk, H., Wu, P., & Pate, B. (2004). A playbook approach to variable autonomy control: Application for control of multiple, heterogeneous unmanned air vehicles. In Proceedings of FORUM 60, the Annual Meeting of the American Helicopter Society (pp. 2146-2157). Alexandria, VA: American Helicopter Society.
7. Miller, C.A., Parasuraman, R (2007) Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: Delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors, 49, 57-75. (Pubitemid 46175382)
8. Parasuraman, R. Galster, S., & Miller C. (2003). Human control of multiple robots in the RoboFlag simulation Environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Man. Systems and Cybernetics. Washington, D.C.
9. Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., Squire, P., Furukawa, H., & Miller, C. (2005). A flexible delegation interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple autonomous robots: Empirical studies with RoboFlag. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 35, 481-493. (Pubitemid 40986431)
10. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B. & Wickens, C.D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation," IEEE Trans. Syst.,Man, Cybern. A. Syst. Humans, vol. 30. pp. 286-297.
11. R. Parasuraman and E. A. Byrne, "Automation and human performancein aviation," in Principles of Aviation Psychology, P. Tsang and M.Vidulich, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003, pp. 311-356.
12. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
13. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., and Billings, C.E. (1997). Automation Surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (2nd edition) (pp. 1926-1943). New York, NY: Wiley.
14. Squire, P.N., Galster, S. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2004) The effects of levels of automation in the human control of multiple robots in the Roboflag simulation environment. In Proceedings of the 2004 Human Performance, Situation Awareness, and Automation Technology Conference II. Daytona Beach, FL.