From tools to teammates: Toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1491-1495

  Phillips, Elizabeth ^a   Ososky, Scott ^a   Grove, Janna ^a   Jentsch, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS; CRITICAL APPLICATIONS; MENTAL MODEL;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; ERGONOMICS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MILITARY APPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 81855185915     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551310     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167-175.
2. Broadbent, E., In Lee, Y., Stafford, R.Q., Kuo, H. & MacDonald, B.A. (2011). Mental schemas of robots as more human-like are associated with higher blood pressure and negative emotions in a human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, DOI 10.1007/s12369-011-0096-9.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. 1995. Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations: 333-380. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177-190.
5. Fabes, R. A., & Martin, C. L. (1991). Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 532-540.
6. Gill, M. J., Swann, W. B., & Silvera, D. H. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101-1114.
7. Hoeft*, R. M., Kochan*, J. A., & Jentsch, F. (2006). Automated systems in the cockpit: Is the autopilot, "George", a team member?. In C. A. Bowers, E. Salas, & F. Jentsch (Eds.), Creating High-Tech Teams: Practical Guidance on Work Performance and Technology (pp. 243-259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Jeon, A. (2011). German shepherd? Belgian malinois? Navy SEAL hero dog is top secret. Global Animal: Your daily animal connection, from pets to wildlife. Retrieved from http://www.globalanimal.org/2011/05/05 /german-shepherd-belgian- malinois-bin-laden-hero-dog-is-top-secret/38799/
10. Kiesler, S., Goetz, J., (2002). Mental models of robotic assistants. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2002). Minneapolis, MN, 576-577.
11. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80. (Pubitemid 44490367)
12. Lee, S-I., Lau, I.Y., Kiesler, S., and Chiu, C. (2005). Human mental models of humanoid robots. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2767-2772. (Pubitemid 46084207)
13. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1), 81-103. (Pubitemid 30442265)
14. Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., Wickens, C. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
16. Perry, T. (2011, February 8). Afghanistan's most loyal troops. Las Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com
17. Rouse, W.B., & Morris, N.M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363.
18. Sheridan, T. B. (1975). Considerations in modeling the human supervisory controller. In Proceedings of the IFAC 6th World Congress Federation of Automatic Control. Laxenburg, Austria, 1-6.
19. Sheridan, T. B., & Hennessy, R. T. (1984). Research and modeling of supervisory control behavior. Washington, DC: National Academy.
20. Shneiderman, B. (1989). A nonanthropomorphic style guide: OVersoming the humpty-dumpty syndrome. The Computing Teacher, 16 (7), 331-335.
21. Sims, V. K., Chin, M. G., Sushil, D. J.,Barber, D.J., Ballion, T., Clark, B. R., Garfield, K. A., Dolezal, M. J., Shumaker, R., & Finkelstein, N., Anthropomorphism of Robotic Forms: A Response to Affordances? Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Orlando, FL.
22. Sims, V.K., Chin, M.G., Yordan, R.E., Sushil, D.J., Barber, D.J., Owens, C.W., Smith, H.S., Dolezal, M.J., Shumaker, R. & Finkelstein, N. (2010). When function follows form: Anthropomorphism of artifact faces. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Orlando, FL.
23. Stapel, D. A., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Similarities and differences between trait concept and expectancy priming: What matters is whether the target stimulus is ambiguous or mixed. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 229-246.
24. Stubbs, K., Wettergreen, D., & Hinds, P. J. (2007). Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: a field study. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22 (2), 42-50. (Pubitemid 46495744)
25. Walters, M. L., Syrdal, D. S., Dautenhaun, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K. L. (2008). Avoiding the uncanny valley: Robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in aan attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robot, 24, 159-178.