Risk attitudes in a social context

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 205-225

  Rohde, Ingrid M T ^a   Rohde, Kirsten I M ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81855161832     PISSN: 08955646     EISSN: 15730476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-011-9127-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion. American Economic Review, 98, 294-310.
2. Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk, and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 467-84.
3. Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 262-275.
4. Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., & Ockenfels, A. (2005). Fair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteries. Economic Journal, 115, 1054-1076.
5. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2010). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: Comment. American Economic Review, 100, 628-33.
6. Brennan, G., González, L. G., Güth, W., & Levati, M. V. (2008). Attitudes toward private and collective risk in individual and strategic choice situations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 253-262.
7. Broome, J. R. (1982). Equity in risk bearing. Operations Research, 30, 412-414.
8. Broome, J. R. (1984). Selecting people randomly. Ethics, 95, 38-55.
9. Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817-869.
10. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370-379.
11. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (2002). Theories of fairness and reciprocity-evidence and economic applications. In M. Dewatripont, L. Hansen, & St. Turnovsky (Eds.), Advances in economics and econometrics-8th world congress, econometric society monographs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fishburn, P. C. (1984). Equity axioms for public risks. Operations Research, 32, 901-908.
13. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.
14. Galí, J. (1994). Keeping up with the Joneses: Consumption externalities, portfolio choice, and asset prices. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 26, 1-8.
15. Hammerton, M., Jones-Lee, M. W., & Abbott, V. (1982). Equity and public risk: Some empirical results. Operations Research, 30, 203-207.
16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
17. Karni, E., Salmon, T., & Sopher, B. (2008). Individual sense of fairness: An experimental study. Experimental Economics, 11, 174-189.
18. Keeney, R. L. (1980). Utility functions for equity and public risk. Management Science, 26, 345-353.
19. Keller, L. R., & Sarin, R. K. (1988). Equity in social risk: Some empirical observations. Risk Analysis, 8, 135-146.
20. Kroll, Y., & Davidovitz, L. (2003). Inequality aversion versus risk aversion. Economica, 70, 19-29.
21. Linde, J., & Sonnemans, J. (2009). Social comparison and risky choices. Working Paper.
22. Sebald, A. (2007). Procedural concerns in psychological games. Working Paper.
23. Shiller, R. J. (2008). The subprime solution: How today's global financial crisis happened, and what to do about it. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
24. Sobel, J. (2005). Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature, 93, 392-436.
25. Trautmann, S. T. (2009). A tractable model of process fairness under risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 803-813.