A note on the analysis of designed experiments with complex treatment structure

HortScience

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 446-452

  Piepho, H P ^a   Williams, E R ^b   Fleck, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analysis of variance; Augmented factorial; Linear contrasts; Linear model; Multiple comparison

Indexed keywords

LINEAR SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUGMENTED FACTORIAL; LINEAR CONTRASTS; LINEAR MODEL; MULTIPLE COMPARISON;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 33645105551     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.41.2.446     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Frömke, C. and F. Bretz. 2004. Simultaneous tests and confidence intervals for the evaluation of agricultural field trials. Agron. J. 96:1323-1330.
2. Hothorn, L.A. and H. Bleiholder. 2006 Statistical aspects of efficacy evaluation of plant protection products in field trials - A comment on the EPPO PP1/152(2) guideline (in press)
3. Littell, R.C., W. W. Stroup, and R. Freund. 2002. SAS for linear models. 4th ed. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
4. Marini, R.P. 2003. Approaches to analyzing experiments with factorial arrangements of treatments plus other treatments. HortScience 38:117-120.
5. McCullagh, P. and J.A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London.
6. Nelder, J.A. 1994. The statistics of linear models: back to basics. Stat. Computing 4:221-234.
7. OEPP/EPPO. 1998. OEPP/EPPO: Design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials, EPPO Standard PP1/152(2). Bul. OEPP/EPPO 28:273-348.
8. Panter, D.M. and F.L. Allen. 1995. Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 2. Selection of superior crosses from a limited number of yield trials. Crop Sci. 35:405-410.
9. Perry, J.N. 1986. Multiple-comparison procedures: a dissenting view. J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1149-1155.
10. Piepho, H.P. 1998. Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor analytic variance-covariance structures. Theor. Appl. Genet 97:195-201.
11. Piepho, H.P., A. Büchse, and K. Emrich. 2003. A hitchhiker's guide to the mixed model analysis of randomized experiments. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 189:310-322.
12. Piepho, H.P. and K. Pillen. 2004. Mixed modelling for QTL x environment interaction analysis. Euphytica 137:147-153.
13. Saville, D. 2003. Basic statistics and the inconsistency of multiple comparison procedures. J. Expt. Psychol. 57:167-175.
14. Searle, S.R. 1987. Linear models for unbalanced data. Wiley, New York.
15. Searle, S.R., G. Casella, and C.E. McCulloch. 1992. Variance components. Wiley, New York.
16. Williams, E.R., A.C. Matheson, and C.E. Harwood. 2002. Experimental design and analysis for tree improvement. 2nd ed. CSIRO Publ., Canberra.