Variance plus bias optimal response surface designs with qualitative factors applied to stem choice modeling

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1199-1210

  Allen, Theodore T ^a   Tseng, Shih Hsien ^a,b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KAINAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

categorical factor; expected integrated mean squared error; minimum bias; optimal experimental design; response surface methods

Indexed keywords

CATEGORICAL FACTOR; MEAN SQUARED ERROR; MINIMUM BIAS; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD;

OPTIMIZATION; STUDENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

DESIGN;

EID: 81755161546     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1210     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Draper NR, John JA,. Response-surface designs for quantitative and qualitative variables. Technometrics 1988; 30: 423-428.
2. Wu CFJ, Ding Y,. Construction of response surface designs for qualitative and quantitative factors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1998; 71: 331-348. (Pubitemid 128340824)
3. Myers RH, Montgomery DC,., Anderson-Cook CM,. Response Surface Methodology (3rd edn). Wiley: New York, 2009.
4. Lenth RV,. Response-surface methods in R. Journal of Statistical Software 2009; 32 (7): 629-641.
5. Anderson-Cook CM, Borror CM, Montgomery DC,. Response surface design evaluation and comparison. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2009; 139 (2): 629-641.
6. Chantarat N, Zheng N, Allen TT, Huang D,. Optimal experimental design for systems involving both quantitative and qualitative factors. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, New Orleans, Chick S, Sanchez PJ, Ferrine D, Morrice DJ (eds.), 2003.
7. Robinson TJ, Brenneman WA, Myers WR,. Process optimization via robust parameter design when categorical noise factors are present. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2006; 22: 307-320. (Pubitemid 43666592)
8. Box GEP, Draper NR,. A basis for the selection of a response surface design. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1959; 54: 622-654.
9. Allen TT, Yu L, Schmitz J,. An experimental design criterion for minimizing meta-model prediction errors applied to die casting machine design. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 2003; 52: 103-117. (Pubitemid 37155360)
10. Box GEP, Draper NR,. Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces. Wiley: New York, 1987.
11. Andere-Rendon J, Montgomery DC, Rollier DA,. Design of mixture experiments using bayesian D-optimality. Journal of Quality Technology 1997; 29: 451-463. (Pubitemid 127581426)
12. DuMouchel W, Jones B,. A simple Bayesian modification of D-optimal designs to reduce dependence on a assumed model. Technometrics 1994; 36: 37-47.
13. Allen TT, Bernshteyn M, Kabiri K,. A Comparison of alternative methods for constructing meta-models for computer experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35: 264-274.
14. Allen TT, Yu L, Bernshteyn M,. Low cost response surface methods applied to the design of plastic snap fits. Quality Engineering 2000; 12: 583-591.
15. Koc M, Allen TT, Jirathearanat S, Altan TT,. The use of FEM and experimental design to investigate tube hydroforming of a simple geometry. The International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2000; 40: 2249-2266.
16. Fishman GS,. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer: New York, 1996.
17. Hadj-Alouane A, Bean J,. A genetic algorithm for the multiple-choice integer program. Operations Research 1997; 45: 92-101. (Pubitemid 127684689)
18. Piepel G,. W.J. Youden Memorial Address. Fall Technical Conference, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A., 2009.
19. Allen TT, Davis N,. A simple agent-based social impact theory model of students stem selection. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A., Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J, Yücesan E (eds.), 2010.
20. Nettle D,. Using social impact theory to simulate language change. Lingua 1999; 108: 95-117.