Optimal experimental design for systems involving both quantitative and qualitative factors

Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 556-564

  Chantarat, Navara ^a   Zheng, Ning ^a   Allen, Theodore T ^a   Huang, Deng ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); ERROR ANALYSIS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EXPECTED INTEGRATED MEAN SQUARED ERRORS (EIMSE); METAMODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 1642519668     PISSN: 02750708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Allen, T. T., Bernshteyn, M., Yu, L., and Kabiri, K. (in press). A Comparison of Alternative Methods for Constructing Meta-Models for Computer Experiments. Journal of Quality Technology.
2. Allen, T. T., Yu, L., and Bernshteyn, M. 2000. Low Cost Response Surface Methods Applied to the Design of Plastic Snap Fits. Quality Engineering, 12, 583-591.
3. Allen, T. T., Yu, L., and Schmitz, J. 2003. An Experimental Design Criterion for Minimizing Meta-Model Prediction Errors Applied to Die Casting Machine Design. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics. 52(1). 1-15.
4. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. 1959. A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface Design. Journal of American Statistics Association. 54. 622-654.
5. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. 1987. Expirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley, NY.
6. Barton, R. R. 1994. Metamodeling: A State Of The Art Review. In Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference ed. J. D. Tew, S. Manivannan, D. A. Sadowski, and A. F. Seila. 237-244. Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA.
7. Draper, N. R. and John, J. A. 1988. Response-Surface Designs for Quantitative and Qualitative Factors. Technometrics. 30(4). 423-428.
8. DuMouchel, W. and Jones, B. 1994. A Simple Bayesian Modification of D-Optimal Designs to Reduce Dependence on a Assumed Model. Technometrics. 36(1). 37-47.
9. Fishman, G. S. 1996. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer-Verlag.
10. Hadj-Alouane, A. and Bean, J. 1997. A Genetic Algorithm for the Multiple-Choice Integer Program. Operations Research. 45. 92-101.
11. nd edition). Marcel Dekker, Inc. NY.
12. Kleijnen, J. P. C. 1987. Statistical tools for simulation practitioners. New York: Marcel Dekker.
13. Kleijnen, J. P. C., and R. G. Sargent. 2000. A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation. European Journal of Operational Research 120: 14-29.
14. Koc M., Allen T. T., Jirathearanat S., and Altan, T. T. 2000. The use of FEM and experimental design to investigate tube hydroforming of a simple geometry. The International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 40. 2249-2266.
15. Law, A. M., and Kelton, W. D. 2000. Simulation modeling and analysis, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Montgomery, D. C. 1997. The design and analysis of experiments, 4th Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
17. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. 1995. Response Surface Methodology. John Wiley. NY.
18. Sargent, G. R. 1991. Reseach Issues In Metamodeling. In Proceedings of the 1991 Winter Simulation Conference ed. B. L. Nelson, W. D. Kelton, and G. M. Clark. 888-893. Phoenix, AZ, USA.
19. Seila, A., Ceric, V., and Tadikamalla, P. 2001. Applied Simulation Modeling. Thomson Learning. 662 pp.
20. Wu, C. F. J. and Ding, Y. 1998. Construction of Response Surface Designs for Qualitative and Quantitative Factors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 71. 331-348.