The precedence of topological change over top-down attention in masked priming

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2011, Pages

  Huang, Yan ^a,b   Zhou, Tiangang ^a   Chen, Lin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Attention; Masking; Perceptual organization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81555228448     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.12.9     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.
2. Chen, L. (1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218, 699-700.
3. Chen, L. (1985). Topological structure in the perception of apparent motion. Perception, 14, 197-208.
4. Chen, L. (2005). The topological approach to perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 12, 553-637.
5. Chen, L., Zhang, S. W., & Srinivasan, M. (2003). Global perception in small brains: Topological pattern recognition in honeybees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6884-6889.
6. Chen, L., & Zhou, W. (1997). Holes in illusory conjunctions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 507-511.
7. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2010). Attentional capture under high perceptual load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 815-820.
8. Enns, J. T., Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2009). Object updating: A force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision. In R. Nijhawan (Ed.), Problems of space and time in perception and action (pp. 503-520). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Enns, J. T., & Oriet, C. (2007). Visual similarity in masking and priming: The critical role of task relevance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 211-240.
10. Finkbeiner, M., & Forster, K. I. (2008). Attention, intention and domain-specific processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 59-64.
11. Han, S., Humphreys, G., & Chen, L. (1999). Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1411-1132.
12. Humphreys, G. W. (2001). A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition, 8, 381-410.
13. Humphreys, G. W., Romani, C., Olson, A., Riddoch, M. J., & Duncan, J. (1994). Non-spatial extinction following lesion of the parietal lobe in Humans. Nature, 372, 357-359.
14. Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research, 58, 92-101.
15. Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-912.
16. Lamy, D., Segal, H., & Ruderman, L. (2006). Grouping does not require attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 68, 17-31.
17. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.
18. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440.
19. Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Psychological Science, 15, 866-871.
20. Moore, C. M., Mordkoff, J. T., & Enns, J. T. (2007). The path of least persistence: Object status mediates visual updating. Vision Research, 47, 1624-1630.
21. Müller, D., Winkler, I., Roeber, U., Schaffer, S., Czigler, I., & Schröger, E. (2010). Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1179-1188.
22. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416.
23. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In M. Moscovitch & C. Umilt (Eds.), Attention & performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Pomerantz, J. R. (2003). Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 471-473.
25. Russell, C., & Driver, J. (2005). New indirect measures of "inattentive" visual grouping in a change-detection task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 606.
26. Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.
27. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation. Psychological Research, 67, 184-196.
28. Schmidt, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 112-118.
29. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1.
30. Tapia, E., Breitmeyer, B., & Shooner, C. (2010). Role of task-directed attention in nonconscious and conscious response priming by form and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 74-87.
31. Todd, J., Chen, L., & Norman, F. (1998). On the relative salience of Euclidean, affine, and topological structure for 3-D form discrimination. Perception, 27, 273-282.
32. Todd, S. H., & Kuzmova, Y. (2011). Can we track holes? Visual Research, 51, 1013-1021.
33. Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
34. Zhou, K., Luo, H., Zhou, T., Zhuo, Y., & Chen, L. (2010). Topological change disturbs object continuity in attentive tracking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 21920-21924.
35. Zhuo, Y., Zhou, T. G., Rao, H. Y., Wang, J. J., Meng, M., Chen, M., et al. (2003). Contributions of the visual ventral pathway to long-range apparent motion. Science, 299, 417-420.