Grouping does not require attention

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 17-31

  Lamy, Dominique ^a   Segal, Hannah ^a   Ruderman, Lital ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; GESTALT THEORY; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33646443414     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193652     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & LAW, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833.
2. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
3. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
4. BEHRMANN, M., ZEMEL, R. S., & MOZER, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
5. BEN-AV, M. B., SAGI, D., & BRAUN, J. (1992). Visual attention and perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 277-294.
6. CRICK, F., & KOCH, C. (1998). Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 97-107.
7. DEWAR, R. E. (1967). Stimulus determinants of the magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 24, 708-710.
8. DRIVER, J., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448-456.
9. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
10. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
11. EGETH, H. E., & LAMY, D. (2003). Attention. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.) & J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Vol. Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 269-292). New York: Wiley.
12. EGETH, H. E., & YANTIS, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
13. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
14. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
15. GREENE, E., & NELSON, B. (1997). Evaluating Müller-Lyer effects using single fin-set configurations. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 293-312.
16. HANDY, T. C., & MANGUN, G. R. (2000). Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 175-186.
17. HANDY, T. C., SOLTANI, M., & MANGUN, G. R. (2001). Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: Event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection. Psychological Science, 12, 213-218.
18. KRAMER, A. F., & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
19. LAMME, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 12-18.
20. LAMY, D. (2000). Object-based selection under focused attention: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1272-1279.
21. LAMY, D., & EGETH, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52-66.
22. LAMY, D., & TSAL, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1387-1400.
23. LAMY, D., & TSAL, Y. (2001). On the status of location in visual selective attention. European Journal of Psychology, 13, 305-342.
24. LAVIE, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective Mention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451-468.
25. LAVIE, N., & DE FOCKERT, J. W. (2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 202-212.
26. LAVIE, N., & DRIVER, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
27. LAVIE, N., & TSAL, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
28. LAW, M. B., & ABRAMS, R. A. (2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1017-1027.
29. MACK, A., & ROCK, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. MACK, A., TANG, B., TUMA, R., KAHN, S., & ROCK, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501.
31. MOORE, C. M., & EGETH, H. E. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 339-352.
32. MOORE, C. M., YANTIS, S., & VAUGHAN, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
33. MOUNTJOY, P. T. (1958). Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Müller-Lyer illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 97-102.
34. MUKERJI, N. (1957). Is "illusion" illusion? Journal of General Psychology, 57, 209-212.
35. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
36. NEISSER, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
37. NORMAN, D. A., & BOBROW, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
38. PALMER, S., & ROCK, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
39. POLLACK, R. H. (1970). Magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion as a function of hue in the absence of lightness contrast. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5, 53-54.
40. RATCLIFF, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
41. ROCK, I., LINNETT, C. M., GRANT, P., & MACK, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502-534.
42. SHOMSTEIN, S., & YANTIS, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41-51.
43. TREISMAN, A., KAHNEMAN, D., & BURKELL, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
44. TREISMAN, A., & SCHMIDT, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
45. VECERA, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
46. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
47. WATSON, S. E., & KRAMER, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49.
48. YANTIS, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-directed determinants of attentional control (tutorial). In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73-104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.