Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Diagnostic performance and effect on therapeutic management of 64-section CT angiography

Radiology

Volumn 261, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 976-986

  Napoli, Alessandro ^a   Anzidei, Michele ^a   Zaccagna, Fulvio ^a   Marincola, Beatrice Cavallo ^a   Zini, Chiara ^a   Brachetti, Giulia ^a   Cartocci, Gaia ^a   Fanelli, Fabrizio ^a   Catalano, Carlo ^a   Passariello, Roberto ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY SURGERY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 81555204316     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11103564     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hertzer NR. The natural history of peripheral vascular disease: implications for its management. Circulation 1991;83(2 Suppl): I12-I19.
2. Meijer WT, Grobbee DE, Hunink MG, Hofman A, Hoes AW. Determinants of peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: the Rotterdam study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160(19):2934-2938. (Pubitemid 32009050)
3. Singh H, Cardella JF, Cole PE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography . J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14(9 Pt 2): S283-S288.
4. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 2001;221(1):146-158. (Pubitemid 32884195)
5. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(3):719-724. (Pubitemid 36237215)
6. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography . AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(4): 1085-1091. (Pubitemid 36363055)
7. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, et al. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multidetector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004; 231(2):555-563. (Pubitemid 38552917)
8. Ota H, Takase K, Igarashi K, et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(1):201-209. (Pubitemid 38017743)
9. Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2005;236(3): 1083-1093. (Pubitemid 41170877)
10. Schertler T, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H, Kruppa M, Marincek B, Boehm T. Sixteen-detector row CT angiography for lower-leg arterial occlusive disease: analysis of section width. Radiology 2005;237(2):649-656. (Pubitemid 41507908)
11. Albrecht T, Foert E, Holtkamp R, et al. 16- MDCT angiography of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(3):702-711. (Pubitemid 47328555)
12. Schernthaner R, Stadler A, Lomoschitz F, et al. Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses. Eur Radiol 2008;18(4):665-671.
13. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23(4):583-589. (Pubitemid 29337155)
14. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000;217(1):105-114. (Pubitemid 33097585)
15. Bezooijen R, van den Bosch HC, Tielbeek AV, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivityencoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. Radiology 2004;231(1):263-271. (Pubitemid 38375437)
16. Vavrik J, Rohrmoser GM, Madani B, Ersek M, Tscholakoff D, Bucek RA. Comparison of MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography as a basis for planning treatment of lower limb occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11(3):294-301. (Pubitemid 38802612)
17. Thurnher S, Miller S, Schneider G, et al. Diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR angiography of the iliofemoral and calf arteries: a large-scale multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(5):1223-1237. (Pubitemid 350033021)
18. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Stijnen T, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the costs and effects of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the DIPAD trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(5):1349-1357. (Pubitemid 351684929)
19. Visser K, Kock MC, Kuntz KM, Donaldson MC, Gazelle GS, Hunink MG. Costeffectiveness targets for multi-detector row CT angiography in the work-up of patients with intermittent claudication. Radiology 2003; 227(3):647-656. (Pubitemid 36583018)
20. Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009;301(4):415-424.
21. Cernic S, Pozzi Mucelli F, Pellegrin A, Pizzolato R, Cova MA. Comparison between 64-row CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the study of lower extremities: personal experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 2009;114(7):1115-1129.
22. Shareghi S, Gopal A, Gul K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multidetector computed tomographic angiography in peripheral vascu lar disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75(1):23-31.
23. Fontaine R, Kim M, Kieny R. Surgical treatment of peripheral circulation disorders [in German]. Helv Chir Acta 1954;21(5-6): 499-533.
24. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140(3):189-202. (Pubitemid 38155650)
25. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 2000;214(2):363-371. (Pubitemid 30077690)
26. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007;45(Suppl S):S5-S67. (Pubitemid 46151680)
27. Schernthaner R, Fleischmann D, Lomoschitz F, Stadler A, Lammer J, Loewe C. Effect of MDCT angiographic findings on the management of intermittent claudication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(5):1215-1222. (Pubitemid 350033020)
28. Schernthaner R, Fleischmann D, Stadler A, Schernthaner M, Lammer J, Loewe C. Value of MDCT angiography in developing treatment strategies for critical limb ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(5):1416-1424.
29. Commission of the European Communities. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR 16262EN. Luxembourg : Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000.
30. Bochud FO, Grecescu M, Valley JF. Calibration of ionization chambers in air kerma length. Phys Med Biol 2001;46(9):2477-2487. (Pubitemid 32895542)
31. Hart D, Jones JD, Wall BF. Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. NRPB report no. R-262. Didcot, England : National Radiological Protection Board, 1994.
32. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007;244(1):112-120. (Pubitemid 46981964)
33. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD. Quantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography. Radiology 2005;236(3):1076-1082. (Pubitemid 41170876)
34. Fraioli F, Catalano C, Napoli A, et al. Lowdose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA. Eur Radiol 2006;16(1):137-146. (Pubitemid 43103577)