Environmental effects of information and communications technologies

Nature

Volumn 479, Issue 7373, 2011, Pages 354-358

  Williams, Eric ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; MANUFACTURING; WASTE DISPOSAL;

COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER; DANGEROUS GOODS; ENERGY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY;

CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENT; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; RECYCLING; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 81555203203     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature10682     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Moore, G. E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38, 114-117 (1965).
2. ITRS International Technology Working Group International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2000-2009 〈http://www.itrs.net〉.
3. Helpman, E. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth (Massachusetts Institut. Technol. Press, 1998).
4. Ayres, R. U. & Warr, B. Accounting for growth: the role of physical work. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 16, 181-209 (2005). (Pubitemid 40252023)
5. Grubler, A. Technology and Global Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998).
6. Meyers, R., Williams, E. & Matthews, H. Scoping the potential of monitoring and control technologies to reduce energy use in U.S. homes. Energy Build. 42, 563-569 (2010).
7. Matthews, H. S. & Williams, E. Telework adoption and energy use in building and transport sectors in the US and Japan. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 11, 21-30 (2005). (Pubitemid 40345532)
8. Worrell, E., Martin, N. & Price, L. Energy Efficiency and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction Opportunities in the U.S. Iron and Steel Sector Report No. LBNL-41724 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1999).
9. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. ICT and Economic Growth. Evidence from OECD Countries, Industries and Firms 〈http://www. labs-associados.org/docs/OCDE-TIC.PDF〉 (OECD, 2003).
10. Williams, E. & Hatanaka, T. Sustainable consumption and the information technology revolution. Proc. First Int. Workshop Sustainable Consumption 69-75 (Soc. Non-traditional Technol., 2003).
11. Hilty, L. Information Technology and Sustainability: Essays on the Relationship (Books on Demand, 2008).
12. Allenby, B. & Rejeski, D. The industrial ecology of emerging technologies. J. Indust. Ecol. 12, 267-269 (2008).
13. Kurzweil, R. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (Viking, 2005).
14. Graedel, T. & Allenby, B. Industrial Ecology and Sustainable Engineering 3rd edn (Prentice-Hall, 2009).
15. Baumann, H. & Tillman, A. M. The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA: An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Applications (Studentlitteratur, 2004).
16. Hendrickson, C., Lave, L. & Matthews, S. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach (RFF Press, 2006).
17. Yu, J., Williams, E., Ju, M. & Yang, Y. Forecasting global generation of obsolete personal computers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3232-3237 (2010).
18. Williams, E. Energy intensity of computer manufacturing: hybrid analysis combining process and economic input-output methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 6166-6174 (2004). (Pubitemid 39491894)
19. Deng, L., Babbitt, C. & Williams, E. Economic-balance hybrid LCA extended with uncertainty analysis: case study of laptop computer. J. Cleaner Prod. 19, 1198-1206 (2011).
20. Bullard, C. & Herendeen, R. The energy cost of goods and services. Energy Policy 55, 268-277 (1975).
21. Leontief, W. Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Rev. Econ. Stat. 18, 105-125 (1936).
22. Williams, E., Weber, C. & Hawkins, T. Hybrid approach to managing uncertainty in life cycle inventories. J. Indust. Ecol. 15, 928-944 (2009).
23. Bullard, C., Pennter, P. & Pilati, D. Net energy analysis: handbook for combining process and input-output analysis. Resour. Energy 1, 267-313 (1978).
24. Engelenburg, W., Van Rossum, M., Blok, K. & Vringer, K. Calculating the energy requirements of household purchases: a practical step by step method. Energy Policy 21, 648-656 (1994).
25. Hertwich, E. G. Consumption and the rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective. J. Indust. Ecol. 9, 85-98 (2005). (Pubitemid 40886191)
26. Greening, L., Greene, D. & Difiglio, C. Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect-a survey. Energy Policy 28, 389-401 (2000). (Pubitemid 30325355)
27. Mokhtarian, P. A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel. Urban Stud. 35, 215-241 (1998).
28. Audirac, I. Information technology and urban form: challenges to smart growth. Int. Region. Sci. Rev. 28, 119-145 (2005).
29. Mol, A. Environmental governance in the Information Age: the emergence of informational governance. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy 24, 497-514 (2006). (Pubitemid 44322438)
30. Greenpeace Research Laboratories. Missed Call: iPhone's Hazardous Chemicals 〈http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/ reports/iPhones-hazardous-chemicals.pdf〉 (Greenpeace International, 2007).
31. Williams, E. et al. Environmental, social and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6446-6454 (2008).
32. Boice, J. et al. Cancer mortality among US workers employed in semiconductor wafer fabrication. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 52, 1082-1097 (2010).
33. Williams, E. The environmental impacts of semiconductor fabrication. Thin Solid Films 461, 2-6 (2004).
34. Wikoff, D. & Birnbaum, L. Human health effects of brominated flame retardants. Handbook Environ. Chem. 16, 19-53 (2011).
35. Shaw, S. et al. Halogenated flame retardants: do the fire safety benefits justify the risks? Rev. Environ. Health 25, 261-305 (2010).
36. Basel Action Network & Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia (Basel Action Network & Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, 2002).
37. Basel Action Network. The Digital Dump: Exporting Re-use and Abuse to Africa. Media Release Version (Basel Action Network, 2005).
38. Toxics Link. Scrapping the High-Tech Myth: Computer Waste in India (Toxics Link, 2003).
39. Tsydenova, O. & Bengtsson, M. Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manage. 31, 45-58 (2011).
40. Chisholm, M. & Bu, K. China's e-waste capital chokes on old computers. Reuters News Service (11 June 2007).
41. Warren, P. Organised crime targets waste recycling 〈http://www. guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/08/recycling-electronic-waste-crime〉 The Guardian (8 July 2009).
42. Nordbrand, S. Out of control: E-waste trade flows from the EU to developing countries (SwedWatch, 2009).
43. Keolian, G., Blanchard, S. & Reppe, P. Life cycle energy, costs and strategies for improving a single family house. J. Indust. Ecol. 4, 135-157 (2000).
44. Green Design Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment 〈http://www.eiolca.net〉 (Green Design Institute, 2011).
45. Williams, E., Ayres, R. & Heller, M. The 1.7 kg microchip: energy and chemical use in the production of semiconductors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 5504-5510 (2002). (Pubitemid 35462599)
46. Boyd, S., Horvath, A. & Dornfeld, D. Life-cycle energy demand and global warming potential of computational logic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 7303-7309 (2009).
47. Boyd, S., Horvath, A. & Dornfeld, D. Life-cycle assessment of computational logic produced from 1995 through 2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014011 (2010).
48. Williams, E., Krishnan, N. & Boyd, S. in Thermodynamics and the Destruction of Resources (eds Bakshi, B., Gutowski, T. & Sekulic, D.) 190-211 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
49. Deng, L. & Williams, E. Functionality versus "typical product" measures of energy efficiency: case study of semiconductor manufacturing. J. Indust. Ecol. 15, 108-121 (2011).
50. Kawamoto, K. et al. Electricity Used by Office Equipment and Network Equipment in the U.S.: Detailed Report and Appendices Report No. LBNL-45917 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2001).
51. Roth, K. W. & Kurtis McKenney, K. Energy Consumption by Consumer Electronics in U.S. Residences 〈http://www.ce.org/pdf/ Energy%20Consumption%20by%20CE%20in%20U.S.%20Residences%20(January%202007). pdf〉 (TIAX, 2007).
52. US Environmental Protection Agency. Energy Star 〈http://www. energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=find-a-product.showProductGroup&pgw- code=CO〉 (Environmental Protection Agency, 2011).
53. Ok, Z., Benneyan, J. & Isaacs, J. Nanotechnology environmental, health and safety issues: brief literature review since 2000. 1-15 Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Sustainable Syst. Technol. (IEEE, 2009).
54. Buchert, M., Schuler, D. & Bleher, D. Critical Metals for Sustainable Technologies and their Recycling Potential (United Nations Environment Programme, 2009).