Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 47, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 39-45

  Brush, Robert ^a   Chenoweth, Richard E ^b   Barman, Todd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Landscape assessment; Landscape preference; Rural landscapes

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; PERCEPTION; RURAL LANDSCAPE;

UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

EID: 0034688602     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00073-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Duncan J.S. Jr. Landscape taste as a symbol of group identity: a Westchester village. Geographical Rev. 63:1973;334-355.
2. Dwyer, J.F., Hutchison, R., 1990. Outdoor recreation participation and preferences by black and white Chicago Households. In: Vining, J. (Ed.), Social Science and Natural Resource Management. Westview Press, pp. 49-65.
3. Kaplan R., Talbot J.F. Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: a review and recent findings. Landscape and Urban Planning. 15:1988;107-117.
4. Kuo F.E., Bacaicoa M., Sullivan W.C. Transforming inner-city landscapes. Environ. Behavior. 30(1):1998;28-59.
5. Linehan J.R., Gross M. Back to the future, back to basics: the social ecology of landscapes and the future of planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning. 43(1-2):1988;207-223.
6. Lyons E. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environ. Behavior. 15(4):1983;487-511.
7. Milbrath L.W., Sahr R.C. Perceptions of environmental quality. Social Indicators Res. 1:1975;397-438.
8. Ribe R.G. The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Environ. Manage. 13(1):1989;55-74.
9. Schroeder H.W. Preferred features of urban parks and forests. J. Arboriculture. 8(12):1982;317-322.
10. Wisconsin Division of Tourism, 1993. Quantitative Consumer Lifestyle Assessment: Final Report.
11. Yang Byoung-E., Brown T.J. A Cross-cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Environ. Behavior. 24(4):1992;471-507.
12. Zube, E.H., Craik, K.H. (Eds.), 1976. Perceiving environmental quality: research and applications. Plenum Press, New York.
13. Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G., Anderson, T.W., 1974. Perception and measurement of scenic resources in the Southern Connecticut River Valley. Institute for Man and his Environment. Amherst, MA.
14. Zube E.H., Sell J.L., Taylor J.G. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning. 9:1982;1-33.