Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 17-31

  Strumse, Einar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030097240     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson, E. (1978). Visual resource assessment: local perceptions of familiar natural environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2. Andrews, F. M., Morgan, J. N., Sonquist, J. A. & Klem, L. (1973). Multiple Classification Analysis. A Report on a Computer Program for Multiple Regression Using Categorical Predictors, 2nd Edn. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
3. Appleton, J. (1975). The Experience of Landscape. London: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Austad, I. (1993). Verdier i det tradisjonelle kulturlandskapet. In E. Framstad & S. Rysstad, Eds, Jordbrukets kulturlandskap. Forskerkonferansen 1992 26-27. oktober - Sundvolden Hotell. Ås: Norges Forskningsrȧd, Forskningsprogram om kulturlandskapet.
5. Austad, I. & Kaland, P. E. (1991). Endring i biologisk mangfold i tradisjonelle kulturmarkstyper pȧ Vestlandet ved gjengroing, tilplanting og skjótseltiltak. Forskningsprosjekt i tilknytning til NMF/NLVF's forskningsprogram om kulturlandskapet. Sogn og Fjordane distriktshøgskule og Botanisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen.
6. Austad, I., Skogen, A., Hauge, L., Helle, T. & Timberlid, A. (1991). Human influenced vegetation types and landscape elements in the cultural landscapes of inner Sogn, western Norway. Norsk. geogr. Tidsskr., 45, 35-58.
7. Balling, J. D. & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5-28.
8. Bernaldez, F. G. & Abello, R. P. (1989). Environmental challenge and environmental preference: age and sex effects. Journal of Environmental Management, 28, 53-70.
9. Bourassa, S. C. (1990). A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and Behavior, 22(6), 787-812.
10. Buhyoff, G. J., Wellman, J. D., Harvey, H. & Fraser, R. A. (1978). Landscape architects' interpretations of people's landscape preferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 6, 255-262.
11. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. & Barkow, J. (1992). Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby, Eds, The Adapted Mind. Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-15.
12. Daniel, T. C. & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The SBE Method. Boulder, CO: USDA. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.
13. Dearden, P. (1984). Factors influencing landscape preferences: an empirical investigation. Landscape Planning, 11, 293-306.
14. Ellsworth, J. C. (1982). Visual assessment of rivers and marshes: an examination of the relationship visual units, perceptual variables, and preference. Unpublished Master's thesis, Utah State University, Logan.
15. Feldman, R. M. (1990). Settlement-identity. Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior, 22(2), 183-229.
16. Gallagher, T. J. (1977). Visual preference for alternative natural landscapes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
17. Hammitt, W. E. (1978). Visual and user preference for a bog environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
18. Hammitt, W. E. (1987). Visual recognition capacity during outdoor recreation experiences. Environment and Behavior, 14, 478-493.
19. Herbert, E. J. (1981). Visual resource analysis: prediction and preference in Oakland County, Michigan. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
20. Herzog, T. R. (1992). A cognitive analysis of preferences for urban spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 237-248.
21. Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1982). The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban landscapes. Population and Environment: Behavioral and Social Issues, 5, 43-59.
22. Hudspeth, T. R. (1982). Visual preference as a tool for citizen participation: a case study of urban waterfront revitalization in Burlington, Vermont. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
23. Hultman, S. G. (1983). Allmänhetens bedömning av skogsmiljöers lämplighet för friluftsliv. 2. En riksdäckande enkät. Rapport 28. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.
24. Kaland, P. E. (1993). Forskning pȧ tradisjonelle kulturmarkstyper. In E. Framstad, E. & S. Rysstad, Eds, Jordbrukets kulturlandskap. Forskerkonferansen 1992 26-27. oktober - Sundvolden Hotell. Ås: Norges Forskningsrȧd, Forskningsprogram om kulturlandskapet.
25. Kaplan, R. (1973). Predictors of environmental preference: designers and 'clients'. In W. F. E. Preiser, Ed., Environmental Design Research. Stroudsburgh, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
26. Kaplan, R. (1977). Preference and everyday nature: method and application. In D. Stokols, Ed., Perspectives on Environment and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Plenum.
27. Kaplan, R. (1985). Nature at the doorstep: residential satisfaction and the nearby environment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2, 115-127.
28. Kaplan, R. & Herbert, E. J. (1987). Cultural and subcultural comparisons in preference for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 281-293.
29. Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1983). Cognition and Environment. Functioning in an Uncertain World. Ann Arbor, MI: Ulrichs Bookstore.
30. Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature. A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Kaplan, S. (1992). Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby, Eds, The Adapted Mind. Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 581-598.
32. Kardell, L. & Mȧrd, H. (1989). Nȧgra gruppers attituder till stubbrytning 1976 och 1988. Rapport 41. Avdelningen för landskapsvȧrd. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
33. Keane, T. D. (1990). The role of familiarity in landscape aesthetics: a study of tallgrass prairie landscapes. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Landscape Architecture) in The University of Michigan.
34. Kellert, S. R. (1978). Perceptions of animals in American society. 41st North American Wildlife Conference Proceedings, pp. 533-546.
35. Keyes, B. E. (1984). Visual preferences of a forest trail environment. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
36. Levin, J. (1977). Riverside preference: on-site and photographic reactions. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
37. Lingoes, J. C. (1972). A general survey of the Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. In R. N. Shephard, A. K. Romney & S. B. Nerlove, Eds, Multidimensional scaling, Vol. 1. New York: Seminar.
38. Lundberg, A. (1990). Vegetasjon og kulturlandskap ved Kalandsvatnet i Fana Bergen: Institutt for geografi, Norges Handelshøyskole og Universitetet i Bergen (Geografi i Bergen, nr. 140).
39. Lyons, E. (1983). Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behavior, 15, 487-511.
40. Macia (1979). Visual perception of landscape: sex and personality differences. In G. H. Elsner & R. C. Smardon, Eds, Our National Landscape. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-35. Berkeley, CA: USDA.
41. Medina, A. Q. (1983). A visual assessment of children's and environmental educators' urban residential preference patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
42. Miller, P. A. (1984). Visual preference and implications for coastal management: a perceptual study of the British Columbia shoreline. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
43. Moore, G. T. (1979). Knowing about environmental knowing: the current state of theory and research on environmental cognition. Environment and Behavior, 11, 33-70.
44. Østerbø, V. (1990). Kulturlandskapet kring Kalandsvatnet, Fana, Bergen kommune. Bergen: Universitetet i Bergen, Institutt for geografi.
45. Penning-Rowsell, E., Gullett, G. H., Searle, G. H. & Witham, S. A. (1977). Public Evaluation of Landscape Quality. Planning Research Group Report 13. Enfield: Middlesex Polytechnic.
46. Polit, D. F. & Hungler, B. P. (1991). Nursing Research. Principles and Methods, 4th Edn. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
47. Porter, M. V. (1987). The role of spatial quality and familiarity in determining countryside landscape preference. Unpublished Master's thesis. University of Washington, Seattle.
48. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
49. Sandahl, T. J. (1989). Kalandsvatnet - Fanaelva En utredning av omrȧdets egnethet for allment friluftsliv, basert pȧ areal-og landskapsvurderinger, samt fysisk/biologiske registreringer langs strandkantene i vassdraget. Bergen: Bergen kommune. Kommunalavdeling fritid, kultur og kirke. Fritidsavdelingen.
50. Savolainen, R. & Kellomäki, S. (1984). Scenic value of the forest as assessed in the field and the laboratory. In O. Saastomoinen, S. G. Hultman, N. E. Koch & L. Mattsson, Eds, Multiple-use Forestry in the Scandinavian Countries. Helsinki: Finnish Forest Research Institute.
51. Shuttleworth, S. (1980). The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 61-76.
52. Silverman, I. & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby, Eds, The Adapted Mind. Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 533-553.
53. Stern, R. C., Dietz, T. & Yaloff, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322-348.
54. Strumse, E. (1994a). Perceptual dimensions in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 281-292.
55. Strumse, E. (1994b). Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 293-303.
56. Tooby, J. & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. Kinzey, Ed., Primate Models of Human Behavior. New York: SUNY Press.
57. Ulrich, R. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4, 17-23.
58. Williams, D. R. & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989). Measuring Place Attachment: Some Preliminary Results. Paper presented at the session on outdoor planning and management. NRPA symposium on leisure research, San Antonio, Texas, October.
59. Woodcock, D. M. (1982). A functionalist approach to environmental preference. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
60. Zube, E. H., Pitt, D. G. & Anderson, T. W. (1974). Perception and Measurement of Scenic Resources in the Connecticut River Valley. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
61. Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L. & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33.
62. Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E. & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: history and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6, 62-80.