Evidence affects hypothesis judgments more if accumulated gradually than if presented instantaneously

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1156-1165

  Whitman, Jennifer C ^a,b   Woodward, Todd S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BC Mental Health and Addictions Research Institute   (Canada)

^c 938   (Canada)

Author keywords

Judgment and decision making; Relative judgment

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355139708     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0141-6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Beach, L. R. (1968). Probability magnitudes and conservative revision of subjective probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 57-63.
3. Bonini, N., & Gonzalez, M. (2005). Inconsistent probability estimates of a hypothesis. Experimental Psychology, 52, 55-66.
4. Fischhoff, B., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review, 90, 239-260.
5. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Ordereffects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
6. Juslin, P., Nilsson, H., & Winman, A. (2009). Probability theory, not the very guide of life. Psychological Review, 116, 856-874.
7. Lopes, L. L. (1985). Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian-inference. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 509-512.
8. Luce, R. D. (1977). The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215-233.
9. Moritz, S., Woodward, T. S., & Lambert, M. (2007). Under what circumstances to patients with schizophrenia jump to conclusions? A liberal acceptance account. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 127-137.
10. Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997). Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review, 104, 406-415.
11. Shanteau, J. C. (1975). Averaging versus multiplying combination rules of inference judgment. Acta Psychologica, 39, 83-89.
12. Speechley, W. J., Whitman, J. C., & Woodward, T. S. (2010). The contribution of hypersalience to the "jumping to conclusions" bias associated with delusions in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 35, 7-17.
13. Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 467-547.
14. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
15. Woodward, T. S., Munz, M., LeClerc, C., & Lecomte, T. (2009). Change in delusions is associated with change in "jumping to conclusions. Psychiatry Research, 170, 124-127.