Both-edges representation of letter position in reading

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1083-1089

  Fischer Baum, Simon ^a   Charny, Jonathan ^b   McCloskey, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Letter migration errors; Letter position representation; Orthographic input coding; Reading; Visual word identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355135464     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0160-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 391-445.
2. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 108. 1. 204.
3. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
4. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 30. 5. 923.
5. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 32. 3. 535.
6. Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2010). The representation of letter position in spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 115, 466-490.
7. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-600. doi: 10. 1037/a0012667.
8. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
9. Henson, R. N. A. (1999). Positional information in short-term memory: relative or absolute? Memory & Cognition, 27, 915-927.
10. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1-18. doi: 10. 1037/a0014277.
11. Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254-271. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2009. 11. 002.
12. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press.
13. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106-151. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogpsych. 2010. 04. 001.
14. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1986). Illusory words: The roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 3-17. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 12. 1. 3.
15. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196158.
16. Whitney, C. (2008). Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Language, 107, 170-178. doi: 10. 1016/j. bandl. 2007. 08. 002.