Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) in endodontics: An in vitro microbiological evaluation

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 889-897

  Poggio, Claudio ^a   Arciola, Carla Renata ^b   Dagna, Alberto ^a   Florindi, Filippo ^a   Chiesa, Marco ^a   Saino, Enrica ^a   Imbriani, Marcello ^a   Visai, Livia ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c International Center for Studies and Research in Biomedicine (ICB)   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Endodontic irrigating solutions; Photoactivated disinfection; Sodium hypochlorite

Indexed keywords

BACILLI; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; DISINFECTION; SODIUM;

ENDODONTIC IRRIGATING SOLUTION; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; IN-VITRO; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS; MICROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION; PHOTO-ACTIVATED; PHOTOACTIVATED DISINFECTION; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; STREPTOCOCCUS SANGUIS;

SODIUM COMPOUNDS;

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PHOTOACTIVATION; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; STREPTOCOCCUS SANGUINIS;

EID: 81355126258     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000056     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics. Principles and practice. St Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
2. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54(3):323-328.
3. Briseno M BM, Wirth R, Hamm G, Standhartfnger W. Efficacy of different irrigation methods and concentrations of root canal irrigation solutions on bacteria in the root canal. Dent Traumatol. 1992;8(1):6-11. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1992. tb00218.x.
4. Kaplan AE, Picca M, Gonzalez MI, Macchi RL, Molgatini SL. Antimicrobial effect of six endodontic sealers: an in vitro evaluation. Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(1):42-45. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00748.x.
5. Mickel AK, Nguyen TH, Chogle S. Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2003;29(4):257-258. doi:10.1097/00004770-200304000-00006.
6. Brown JI, Doran JE. An in vitro evaluation of the particle flotation capability of various irrigating solutions. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1975;3(3):60-63.
7. D'Arcangelo C, Varvara G, De Fazio P. An evaluation of the action of different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobicanaerobic, obligate anaerobic, and microaerophilic bacteria. J Endod. 1999;25(5):351-353. doi:10.1016/S0099- 2399(06)81170-2.
8. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 1994;20(6):276-278. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80815-0.
9. Siqueira JF, Batista MM, Fraga RC, de Uzeda M. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented Gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod. 1998;24(6):414-416. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80023-X.
10. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1998;85(1):86-93.
11. Shabahang S, Pouresmail M, Torabinejad M. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of MTAD and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2003;29(7):450-452. doi:10.1097/00004770-200307000- 00006.
12. Yesilsoy C, Whitaker E, Cleveland D, Phillips E, Trope M. Antimicrobial and toxic effects of established and potential root canal irrigants. J Endod. 1995;21(10):513-515. doi:10.1016/ S0099-2399(06)80524-8.
13. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S. Pathways of the pulp. 10th edition. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.
14. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Sforza D, Visai L. Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite-based irrigating solutions. Int J Artif Organs. 2010;33(9):654-659.
15. Byström A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the ef fect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55(3):307-312. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(83)90333-X.
16. Mentz TCF. The use of sodium hypochlorite as a general endodontic medicament. Int Endod J. 1982;15(3):132-136. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1982.tb01265.x.
17. Ohara PK, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD. Antibacterial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected anaerobic bacteria. Dent Traumatol. 1993;9(3):95-100. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1993.tb00258.x.
18. Shih M, Marshall FJ, Rosen S. The bactericidal efficiency of sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1970;29(4):613-619. doi:10.1016/0030- 4220(70)90473-1.
19. Siqueira JF, MacHado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J. 1997;30(4):279-282. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997. tb00708.x.
20. Thè SD. The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on fixed and unfixed necrotic tissue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979;47(6):558-561. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(79)90281-0.
21. Türkün M, Cengiz T. The effects of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on tissue dissolution and root canal cleanliness. Int Endod J. 1997;30(5):335-342. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00720.x.
22. Sirtes G, Waltimo T, Schaetzle M, Zehnder M. The effects of temperature on sodium hypochlorite short-term stability, pulp dissolution capacity, and antimicrobial efficacy. J Endod. 2005;31(9):669-671. doi:10.1097/01. don.0000153846.62144.d2.
23. Rossi-Fedele G, De Figueiredo JAP. Use of a bottle warmer to increase 4% sodium hypochlorite tissue dissolution ability on bovine pulp. Aust Endod J. 2008;34(1):39-42. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00110.x.
24. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J. 2003;36(12):810-830. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2591.2003.00754.x.
25. Zehnder M, Schmidlin P, Sener B, Waltimo T. Chelation in root canal therapy reconsidered. J Endod. 2005;31(11):817-820. doi:10.1097/01.don.0000158233.59316.fe.
26. Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001;34(1):1-10. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x.
27. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, Vanwinkelhoff AJ. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2001;27(2):76-81. doi:10.1097/00004770- 200102000-00002.
28. Sen BH, Piskin B, Demirci T. Observation of bacteria and fungi in infected root canals and dentinal tubules by SEM. Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(1):6-9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1995. tb00671.x.
29. de Paz LC. Redefining the persistent infection in root canals: possible role of biofilm communities. J Endod. 2007;33(6):652-662. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.004.
30. Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, Happonen RP, Möller ÅJR. Influence of residual bacteria on periapical tissue healing after chemomechanical treatment and root filling of experimentally infected monkey teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114(4):278-285. doi:10.1111/j.1600- 0722.2006.00380.x.
31. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1997;30(5):297-306. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997. tb00714.x.
32. Hamblin MR, Hasan T. Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2004;3(5):436-450. doi:10.1039/b311900a.
33. Saino E, Sbarra MS, Arciola CR, et al. Photodynamic action of Tri-meso (N-methyl-pyridyl), meso (N-tetradecyl-pyridyl) porphine on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms grown on Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Artif Organs. 2010;33(9):636-645.
34. Sbarra MS, Arciola CR, Di Poto A, et al. The photodynamic effect of tetra-substituted N-methyl-pyridyl-porphine combined with the action of vancomycin or host defense mechanisms disrupts Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32(9):574-583.
35. Burns T, Wilson M, Pearson GJ. Sensitisation of cariogenic bacteria to killing by light from a helium-neon laser. J Med Microbiol. 1993;38(6):401-405. doi:10.1099/00222615-38- 6-401.
36. Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid TMS, Pearson GJ. Microbiological evaluation of photo-activated disinfection in endodontics (An in vivo study). Br Dent J. 2006;200(6):337-341. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813371.
37. Schlafer S, Vaeth M, Horsted-Bindslev P, Frandsen EVG. Endodontic photoactivated disinfection using a conventional light source: an in vitro and ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2010;109(4):634-641.
38. Gambarini G, Plotino G, Grande NM, et al. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of Fotosan licht.activated disinfection on human fibroblasts. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17(3):21-25.
39. Kömerik N, Curnow A, MacRobert AJ, Hopper C, Speight PM, Wilson M. Fluorescence biodistribution and photosensitising activity of toluidine blue o on rat buccal mucosa. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17(2):86-92. doi:10.1007/s101030200015.
40. Williams JA, Pearson GJ, John Colles M. Antibacterial action of photoactivated disinfection PAD used on endodontic bacteria in planktonic suspension and in artificial and human root canals. J Dent. 2006;34(6):363-371. doi:10.1016/j. jdent.2005.08.002.
41. Williams J, Pearson GJ, Colles J, Wilson M. The antibacterial effect of Toluidine Blue O on bacterial colonies in a collagen matrix and carious dentine. Caries Res. 2004;38(6):530-536. doi:10.1159/000080582
42. Arciola CR, An YH, Campoccia D, Donati ME, Montanaro L. Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28(11):1091-1100.
43. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4457-4463. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.031.
44. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Rosti F, Scribante A, Saino E, Visai L. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different restorative materials. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32(9):671-677.
45. Ayhan H, Sultan N, Cirak M, Ruhi MZ, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected microorganisms. Int Endod J. 1999;32(2):99-102. doi:10.1046/ j.1365-2591.1999.00196.x.
46. Radcliffe CE, Potouridou L, Qureshi R, et al. Antimicrobial activity of varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the endodontic microorganisms Actinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2004;37(7):438-446. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2591.2004.00752.x.
47. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001;34(6):424-428. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x
48. Soukos NS, Chen PSY, Morris JT, et al. Photodynamic therapy for endodontic disinfection. J Endod. 2006;32(10):979-984. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.007.
49. Jori G. Photodynamic therapy of microbial infections: state of the art and perspectives. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2006;25(1-2):505-519.
50. Konopka K, Goslinski T. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2007; 86(8): 694-707. doi:10.1177/ 154405910708600803.