New public management and the politics of accountability

International Handbook of Public Management Reform

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 66-87

  Gregory, Robert ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255204813     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Argyris, C. and D. Schön (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2. Argyris, C. and D. Schön (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3. Aucoin, P. (1990), 'Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums', Governance, 3: 115-37.
4. Aucoin, P. and R. Heintzman (2000), 'The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform', International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66: 45-55.
5. Barker, A. (1988), 'Political responsibility for UK prison security - ministers escape again', Public Administration, 76: 1-23.
6. Behn, R. (2001), Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Boston, J. (2000), 'The challenge of evaluating systemic change: the case of public management reform', International Public Management Journal, 3: 23-46.
8. Boston, J. and C. Eichbaum (2005), 'State sector reform and renewal in New Zealand: lessons for governance', paper prepared for the conference on 'Repositioning of Public Governance - Global Experiences and Challenges', Taipei, 18-19 November.
9. Bovens, M. (1998), The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chapman, R. (2000), 'Accountability: is Westminster the problem?', Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59: 116-23.
11. Christensen, Tom and Per Lægreid (eds) (2001), New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, Aldershot: Ashgate.
12. Christensen, Tom and Per Lægreid (eds) (2007), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Aldershot: Ashgate.
13. Cribb, Jo (2006), Being Accountable: Voluntary Organisations, Government Agencies and Contracted Social Services in New Zealand, Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.
14. Crozier, Michel (1964), The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Day, Patricia and Rudolf Klein (1987), Accountabilities: Five Public Services, London: Tavistock.
16. DeLeon, Linda (1998), 'Accountability in a "Reinvented" government', Public Administration, 76: 539-58.
17. DeLeon, Linda (2003), 'On acting responsibly in a disorderly world: individual ethics and administrative responsibility', in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Handbook of Public Administration, London: Sage Publications.
18. Dubnick, Melvin (1998), 'Clarifying accountability: an ethical theory framework', in C. Sampford, N. Preston and C.-A. Bois (eds), Public Sector Ethics: Finding and Implementing Values, London: Routledge.
19. Dubnick, Melvin and Barbara Romzek (1991), American Public Administration: Politics and the Management of Expectations, New York: Macmillan.
20. Eichbaum, Chris and Richard Shaw (2007), 'Ministerial advisers, politicisation and the retreat from Westminster: the case of New Zealand', Public Administration, 85: 609-40.
21. Flinders, Matthew and Jim Buller (2006), 'Depoliticization, democracy and arena shifting', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 53-81.
22. Gregory, Robert (1995), 'The peculiar tasks of public management: toward conceptual discrimination', Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54: 171-83.
23. Gregory, Robert (1998b), 'Political responsibility for bureaucratic incompetence: tragedy at Cave Creek', Public Administration, 76: 519-38.
24. Gregory, Robert (1998a), 'A New Zealand tragedy: problems of political responsibility', Governance, 11: 231-40.
25. Gregory, Robert (1999), 'Social capital theory and administrative reform: maintaining ethical probity in public service', Public Administration Review, 59: 63-75.
26. Gregory, Robert (2003), 'Accountability in modern government', in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Handbook of Public Administration, London: Sage Publications.
27. Gregory, Robert (2006), 'Theoretical faith and practical works: de-autonomizing and joining-up in the New Zealand state sector', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 137-61.
28. Gregory, Robert (2007), 'New public management and the ghost of Max Weber: exorcised or still haunting?', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 221-43.
29. Gregory, Robert and Colin Hicks (1999), 'Promoting public service integrity: a case for responsible accountability', Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58: 3-15.
30. Hodge, Graeme, and Ken Coghill (2007), 'Accountability in the privatized state', Governance, 20: 675-702.
31. Hood, Christopher (1998), 'Individualized contracts for top public servants: copying business, path-dependent political re-engineering - or trobriand cricket?', Governance, 11: 443-62.
32. Hood, Christopher (2002), 'The risk game and the blame game', Government and Opposition, 37: 15-37.
33. Hood, Christopher (2007), 'What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?', Public Management Review, 9: 191-210.
34. Hood, Christopher and Martin Lodge (2006), The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty - and Blame, New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Hood, Christopher and B. Guy Peters (2004), 'The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14: 267-82.
36. Hughes, Owen (1998), Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, 2nd edn, New York: St. Martins Press.
37. Hummel, Ralph (1994), The Bureaucratic Experience: A Critique of Life in the Modern Organization, New York: St. Martins Press.
38. Hupe, Peter and Michael Hill (2007), 'Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability', Public Administration, 85: 279-99.
39. Kaufman, Herbert (1977), Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Le Grand, Julian (2003), Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Lipsky, Michael (1980), Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42. Lucas, John (1976), Democracy and Participation, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
43. Maor, Moshe (1999), 'The paradox of managerialism', Public Administration Review, 59: 5-18.
44. Marcussen, Martin (2007), 'Central banking reform across the world: only by night are all cats grey', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid.(eds), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 135-54.
45. Mosher, Frederick (1968), Democracy and the Public Service, New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Moynihan, Donald (2007), The Normative Model in Decline? Public Service Motivation in the Age of Governance, La Follette School Working Paper No. 2007-021. Madison, WI: Robert M La Follette School of Public Affairs.
47. Mulgan, Richard (2000), '"Accountability": an ever-expanding concept?', Public Administration, 78: 555-74.
48. Mulgan, Richard (2003), Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49. Mulgan, Richard (2006), 'Government accountability for outsourced services', Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65: 48-58.
50. Mulgan, Richard (2007), 'Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice', Public Administration, 85: 569-86.
51. Neustadt, Richard (1990), Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan, New York: Free Press.
52. Norman, Richard (2003), Obedient Servants: Management Freedoms and Accountabilities in the New Zealand Public Sector, Wellington: Victoria University Press.
53. O'Toole, Laurence and Kenneth Meier (2004), 'Desperately seeking Selznick: cooptation and the dark side of public management networks', Public Administration Review, 64: 681-93.
54. Page, B. (1990), 'Ministerial resignation and individual ministerial responsibility in Australia', Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 28: 141-61.
55. Palmer, Geoffrey (1987), Unbridled Power: An Interpretation of New Zealand's Constitution and Government, 2nd edn, Auckland: Oxford University Press.
56. Peters, B. Guy, (2006), 'Understanding the public sector: the significance of size and complexity?', The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 28: 99-116.
57. Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, New York: St. Martins Press.
58. Pierre, Jon (1998), 'Public consultation and citizen participation: dilemmas of policy advice', in B.G. Peters and D. Savoie (eds), Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, Montreal and Kingston: Canadian Centre for Management Development/McGill-Queen's University Press.
59. Pollitt, Christopher and Geert Bouckaert (2004), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edn, New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Public Policy Forum (2007), Leading By Example, Ottawa: Public Policy Forum.
61. Rhodes, Rod (1997), Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
62. Rhodes, Rod (2005), 'Is Westminster dead in Westminster (and why should we care)?', inaugural lecture in the ANZSOG-ANU Public Lecture Series, The Shine Dome, Academy of Science, Canberra, 23 February.
63. Rhodes, Rod (2007), 'Understanding governance: ten years on', Organization Studies 28: 1243-1264.
64. Romzek, Barbara and Patricia Ingraham (2000), 'Cross pressures of accountability: initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown plane crash', Public Administration Review, 60: 240-53.
65. Rorty, Richard (1999), Philosophy and Social Hope, London: Penguin Books.
66. Savoie, Donald and B. Guy Peters (eds) (1998), Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, Montreal and Kingston: Canadian Centre for Management Development/McGill-Queen's University Press.
67. Schön, Donald (1971), Beyond the Stable State, London: Temple Smith.
68. Skelley, Douglas (2002), 'The ambiguity of results: assessments of the new public management', Public Administration and Management, 7: 168-87.
69. Snow, Charles Percy (1961), 'The moral un-neutrality of science', Science, 133 (3448): 255-62.
70. Stace, Hilary and Jacqueline Cumming (2006), 'Contracting between government and the voluntary sector: where to from here?', Policy Quarterly, 2: 13-20.
71. Stiglitz, Joseph (2002), Globalization and its Discontents, New York: Norton.
72. Stone, Bruce (1995), 'Administrative accountability in the "Westminster" democracies: towards a new conceptual framework', Governance, 8: 505-26.
73. Sutherland, Sharon (1991), 'Responsible government and ministerial responsibility: every reform is its own problem', Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24: 91-120.
74. Thomas, Paul (2007), 'Trust, leadership and accountability in Canada's public sector', paper prepared for the conference, 'Canadian public administration in transition: from administration to management to governance', Guelph University, 21-22 September.
75. Thompson, Elaine and Greg Tillotsen (1999), 'Caught in the act: the smoking gun view of ministerial responsibility', Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58: 48-57.
76. Uhr, John (1993), 'Redesigning accountability: from muddles to maps', Australian Quarterly, (Winter): 1-16.
77. Weaver, Kent (1986), 'The politics of blame avoidance', Journal of Public Policy, 6: 371-98.
78. Williamson, John. 2002. 'Did the Washington Consensus Fail?', Outline of Speech at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, Washington DC, 6 November.
79. Wilson, James Q. (1989), Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, New York: Basic Books.
80. Woodhouse, Diana (1993), 'Ministerial responsibility in the 1990s: when do ministers resign?', Parliamentary Affairs, 46: 277-92.