The challenge of evaluating systemic change: The case of public management reform

International Public Management Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-46

  Boston, Jonathan ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011315985     PISSN: 10967494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7494(00)00033-7     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Barnes C. Public sector corruption under centralized and decentralized models a theoretical framework. MPP Research Project . 1999;University of Wellington, Victoria.
2. Boston J. The state under contract. 1995;Bridget Williams Books, Wellington.
3. Boston J. Public sector management, electoral reform and the future of the contract state in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 57:(4):1998;32-43.
4. Boston J., Dalziel P., St. John S. Redesigning the welfare state in New Zealand. 1999;Oxford University Press, Auckland.
5. Boston J., Martin J., Pallot J., Walsh P. Public management the New Zealand model . 1996;Oxford University Press, Auckland.
6. Boston J., Pallot J. Linking strategy and performance developments in the New Zealand public sector . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 16:(3):1997;382-404.
7. Bushnell P. Does evaluation of policies matter? Evaluation. 4:1998;363-371.
8. Campos J., Pradhan S. Evaluating public expenditure management systems an experimental methodology with an application to the Australia and New Zealand reforms . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 16:1997;423-445.
9. Chen, M. (1999). The diminishing scope of judicial review. Paper presented to the Fourth Annual Administrative Law Conference, 24-25 February.
10. Controller & Auditor-General. (1996). Report on governance issues in crown entities. Wellington, November.
11. Controller & Auditor-General. (1999). Third report for 1999. Wellington.
12. Controller & Auditor-General. (1999). Report on inquiry into certain events concerning the New Zealand tourism board. Wellington, April.
13. Di Francesco M. Measuring performance in policy advice output Australian developments . The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 12:(5):1999;420-431.
14. Doolin B., Lawrence S. Managerialism, information technology and health reform in New Zealand. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 10:(1/2):1997;108-122.
15. Duncan I., Bollard A. Corporatization and privatization lessons from New Zealand . 1992;Oxford University Press, Auckland.
16. Easton B. The commercialisation of New Zealand. 1997;Auckland University Press, Auckland.
17. Gregory R. Political responsibility for bureaucratic incompetence tragedy at Cave Creek . Public Administration. 76:1998;519-538.
18. Gregory R. Social capital theory and administrative reform maintaining ethical probity in public service . Public Administration Review. 59:1999;63-75.
19. Halligan, J. (1997). New public sector models: reform in Australia and New Zealand. In J. Lane (Ed.), Public sector reform. Rationale, trends and problems. London: Sage.
20. Henisz W. The institutions and governance of economic reform theoretical extensions and applications . Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory. 1:(3):1999;349-371.
21. Henry D. Reform of a major service delivery agency-not platitudes but action. Administration. 43:(1):1995;16-35.
22. Hood C. A public management for all seasons. Public Administration. 69:(1):1991;3-19.
23. Kelsey J. The New Zealand experiment. 1995;Auckland University Press, Auckland.
24. Kickert. (1999). Discussion of the paper of Sandra Dawson and Charlotte Dargie. Public Management, 1 (4), 483-487.
25. Logan B. Review of state sector reforms. 1991;State Services Commission, Wellington.
26. Martin J. Ethics in public service the New Zealand experience . Preston N. Ethics for the public sector education and training . 1994;Federation Press, Annandale.
27. Norman R. New Zealand's re-invented government experiences of public sector managers . Pubic Sector. 18:1995;22-25.
28. Norman R. Cases in public sector innovation accounting for government . 1997;Victoria Link, Wellington.
29. Economic surveys New Zealand . 1996;OECD, Paris.
30. Towards better governance public service reform in New Zealand (1984-94) and its relevance to Canada . 1995;Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa.
31. Petrie M. Organisational transformation the income support experience . 1998;Department of Social Welfare, Wellington.
32. Pallot J. New public management reform in New Zealand the collective strategy phase . International Public Management Journal. 1:(1):1998;1-18.
33. Parsons W. Public policy an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis . 1995;Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
34. Perry P., Webster A. New Zealand politics at the turn of the millennium attitudes and values about politics and government . 1999;Alpha Publications, Auckland.
35. Pollitt C. Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the New Public Management, Evaluation. 1:(2):1995;133-154.
36. Pollitt C. Managerialism revisited. Peters B.G., Savoie D.J. Taking stock assessing public sector reforms . 1998;McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal and Kingston.
37. Pollitt, C. (1998). How do we know how good public services are? Paper for the CCMD Authors' Roundtable, Ottawa, 12-14 November.
38. Performance contracting. 1999;OECD, Paris.
39. Ryan N. A comparison of contracting arrangements in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 12:(2):1999;91-102.
40. Ryan N., Brown K. Measuring the performance of community organisations in Queensland and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 57:(3):1998;41-51.
41. Savoie D. Fifteen years of reform what have we learned? Peters B.G., Savoie D.J. Taking stock assessing public sector reforms . 1998;McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal and Kingston.
42. Schick A. The spirit of reform. 1996;State Services Commission, Wellington.
43. Schick A. Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand's reforms. World Bank Research Observer. 13:1998;1.
44. Scott G., Bushnell P., Sallee N. Reform of the core public sector New Zealand experience . Governance. 3:1990;138-167.
45. Scott, G. (1997). Continuity and change in public management: second generation issues in roles, responsibilities and relationships. In Future issues in public management. Wellington: State Services Commission.
46. Shaw, R. (1999). Rehabilitating the public service-alternatives to the Wellington model. In Chris Eichbaum, et al. (Eds.), The new politics: a third way for New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
47. Spicer B., Emanuel D., Powell M. Transforming government enterprises managing radical organizational change in deregulated environments . 1995;Auckland University.
48. Assessment of the state of the New Zealand public service. 1998;State Services Commission, Wellington.
49. Briefing for the minister of state services. 1999;State Services Commission, Wellington.
50. Steane P. Public management developments in Australia and New Zealand. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory. 1:(1):1999;133-142.
51. Stent R. Canterbury Health Ltd a report by the health and disability commissioner . 1998;Health and Disability Commissioner, Auckland.
52. Taggart, M. (1990). Corporatisation, privatisation and public law. Legal Research Foundation, Publication No. 31.
53. The Australian public service reformed an evaluation of a decade of management reform . 1992;Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
54. Thompson G. What is wrong with New Zealand's service performance reporting model the case of public museums . Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory. 1:(4):1999;511-530.
55. Briefing to the incoming government. 1996;The Treasury, Wellington.
56. Turner, D., & Washington, S. (1999). Evaluation in the New Zealand public management system. Unpublished paper.
57. Upton S. The role of the state. IPS Policy Newsletter. 56:1999;8-15.
58. Wistrich E. Restructuring government New Zealand style. Public Administration. 70:1992;119-135.