The role of right temporal lobe structures in off-line action: Evidence from lesion-behavior mapping in stroke patients

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2751-2761

  Rossit, Stéphanie ^a   Malhotra, Paresh ^b   Muir, Keith ^c   Reeves, Ian ^d   Duncan, George ^d   Harvey, Monika ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Institute of Neuro Logical Sciences   (United Kingdom)

^d SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

middle temporal gyrus; parahippocampal gyrus; superior temporal gyrus; visuomotor control; voxel based lesion behavior mapping

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

AGED; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 81055145741     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr073     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Annett M. 1967. The binomial distribution of right, mixed and left-handedness. Q J Exp Psychol. 19:327-333.
2. Astafiev SV, Shulman GL, Stanley CM, Snyder AZ, Van Essen DC,-Corbetta M. 2003. Functional organization of human intraparietal-and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing. J Neurosci. 23:4689-4699. (Pubitemid 36706197)
3. Beurze SM, de Lange FP, Toni I, Medendorp WP. 2007. Integration of-target and effector information in the human brain during reach-planning. J Neurophysiol. 97:188-199. (Pubitemid 46143349)
4. Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ. 1998. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology. 50:1253-1259. (Pubitemid 28240336)
5. Bisiach E, Geminiani G, Berti A, Rusconi ML. 1990. Perceptual and-premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology. 40:1278-1281. (Pubitemid 20244993)
6. Blangero A, Menz MM, McNamara A, Binkofski F. 2009. Parietal modules-for reaching. Neuropsychologia. 47:1500-1507.
7. Brunner E, Munzel U. 2000. The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher-problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation. Biometrical J. 42:17-25.
8. Butler SH, Rossit S, Gilchrist ID, Ludwig CJH, Olk B, Muir K, Reeves I,-Harvey M. 2009. Non-lateralized deficits in anti-saccade performance in patients with hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 47:2488-2495.
9. Carey DP, Dijkerman HC, Murphy KJ, Goodale MA, Milner AD. 2006. Pointing to places and space in the visual form agnostic DF. Neuropsychologia. 44:1584-1594. (Pubitemid 43849861)
10. Carey DP, Hargreaves EL, Goodale MA. 1996. Reaching to ipsilateral or-contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing-cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control. Exp Brain-Res. 112:496-504. (Pubitemid 27010801)
11. Catani M, Howard RJ, Pajevic S, Jones DK. 2002. Virtual in vivo-interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage. 17:77-94.
12. Chua R, Carson RG, Goodman D, Elliott D. 1992. Asymmetries in the spatial-localization of transformed targets. Brain Cognition. 20:227-235.
13. Cohen YE, Andersen RA. 2002. A common reference frame for movement-plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:553-562. (Pubitemid 135706665)
14. Colby CL. 1998. Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron. 20:15-24. (Pubitemid 28078345)
15. Committeri G, Galati G, Paradis A L, Pizzamiglio L, Berthoz A, LeBihan D. 2004. Reference frames for spatial cognition: different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgements about object location. J Cogn Neurosci. 16:1517-1535. (Pubitemid 39614253)
16. Connolly JD, Goodale MA, Desouza JF, Menon RS, Vilis T. 2000. A comparison of frontoparietal fMRI activation during anti-saccades and anti-pointing. J Neurophysiol. 84:1645-1655.
17. Coulthard E, Parton A, Husain M. 2006. Action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 44:2717-2733. (Pubitemid 44511946)
18. Coulthard E, Parton A, Husain M. 2007. The modular architecture of the neglect syndrome: implications for action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 45:1982-1984. (Pubitemid 46386131)
19. Culham J. 2004. Human brain imaging reveals a parietal area specialized for grasping. In: Kanwisher N, Duncan J, editors. Functional neuroimaging of visual cognition: attention and performance XX. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 417-438.
20. Culham JC, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A. 2006. The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia. 44:2668-2684. (Pubitemid 44511945)
21. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2003. Visually-guided grasping produces activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res. 153:158-170.
22. Culham JC, Valyear KF. 2006. Human parietal cortex in action. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 16:205-212.
23. Dijkerman HC, Milner AD, Carey DP. 1998. Grasping spatial relationships: failure to demonstrate allocentric visual coding in a patient with visual form agnosia. Conscious Cogn. 7:424-437. (Pubitemid 128352133)
24. Edgeworth JA, Robertson IH, McMillan TM. 1998. The Balloons test. Bury St Edmunds (UK): Thames Valley Test Company Limited.
25. Galati G, Lobel E, Berthoz A, Pizzamiglio L, Le Bihan D, Vallar G. 2000. The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: a functional magnetic resonance study. Exp Brain Res. 133:156-164. (Pubitemid 30449901)
26. Gallivan JP, Cavina-Pratesi C, Culham JC. 2009. Is that within reach?: fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex (SPOC) encodes objects reachable by the hand. J Neurosci. 29:4381-4391.
27. Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM. 1994. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia. 10:1159-1178. (Pubitemid 24323750)
28. Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. 2001. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 41:1409-1422. (Pubitemid 32367900)
29. Grimsen C, Hildebrandt H, Fahle M. 2008. Dissociation of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in visual search after right middle cerebral artery stroke. Neuropsychologia. 46:902-914.
30. Halligan PW, Manning L, Marshall JC. 1990. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of four patients with right hemisphere damage and normal controls. Neuropsychologia. 28:1043-1051. (Pubitemid 20347466)
31. Harvey M, Jackson SR, Newport R, Kramer T, Morris DL, Dow L. 2001. Is grasping impaired in hemispatial neglect? Behav Neurol. 13:17-28.
32. Harvey M, Milner AD, Roberts RC. 1995. An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task. Brain Cognition. 27:59-78.
33. Heath M, Maraj A, Gradkowski A, Binsted G. 2009. Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space. Exp Brain Res. 192:275-286.
34. Heath M, Maraj A, Maddigan M, Binsted G. 2009. The antipointing task: vector inversion is supported by a perceptual estimate of visual space. J Motor Behav. 41:383-392.
35. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, Barker PB, Herskovits EH, Degaonkar M. 2005. Anatomy of spatial attention: insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. J Neurosci. 25:3161-3167. (Pubitemid 40463551)
36. Himmelbach M, Karnath HO. 2005. Dorsal and ventral stream-interaction: contributions from optic ataxia. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:632-640. (Pubitemid 40478285)
37. Himmelbach M, Karnath HO, Perenin MT. 2007. Action control is not-affected in hemispatial neglect: a comment on Coulthard et al. Neuropsychologia. 45:1979-1981. (Pubitemid 46386111)
38. Husain M, Rorden C. 2003. Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in-hemispatial neglect. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4:26-36. (Pubitemid 37271086)
39. James TW, Culham J, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2003. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain. 126:2463-2475. (Pubitemid 37314436)
40. Karnath HO, Berger MF, Kuker W, Rorden C. 2004. The anatomy of-spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140-patients. Cereb Cortex. 14:1164-1172. (Pubitemid 39268905)
41. Karnath HO, Dick H, Konczak J. 1997. Kinematics of goal-directed arm-movements in neglect: control of hand in space. Neuropsychologia. 35:435-444. (Pubitemid 27143996)
42. Karnath HO, Perenin MT. 2005. Cortical control of visually guided-reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cereb Cortex. 15:1561-1569.
43. Kroliczak G, Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodman D, Culham JC. 2007. What does-the brain do when you fake it? An fMRI study of pantomimed and-real grasping. J Neurophysiol. 97:2410-2422. (Pubitemid 46411170)
44. Malach R, Reppas JB, Benson RR, Kwong KK, Jiang H, Kennedy WA,-Ledden PJ, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Tootell RB. 1995. Object-related-activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in-human occipital cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:8135-8139.
45. Malhotra PA, Coulthard EJ, Husain M. 2009. Role of right posterior-parietal cortex in maintaining attention to spatial locations over-time. Brain. 132:645-660.
46. Malhotra P, Jagar HR, Parton A, Greenwood R, Playford ED, Brown MM,-Driver J, Husain M. 2005. Spatial working memory capacity in-unilateral neglect. Brain. 128:424-435. (Pubitemid 40222611)
47. Malhotra P, Mannan S, Driver J, Husain M. 2004. Impaired spatial-working memory: one component of the visual neglect syndrome?-Cortex. 40:667-676. (Pubitemid 39303097)
48. Malhotra PA, Parton AD, Greenwood R, Husain M. 2006. Noradrenergic- modulation of space exploration in visual neglect. Ann Neurol. 59:186-190. (Pubitemid 43042887)
49. Maraj A, Heath M. 2010. Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control. Exp Brain Res. 202:55-64.
50. McIntosh RD, McClements KI, Dijkerman HC, Birchall D, Milner AD. 2004. Preserved obstacle avoidance during reaching in patients with-left visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 42:1107-1117. (Pubitemid 38456897)
51. Milner AD. 1995. Cerebral correlates of visual awareness. Neuropsychologia. 33:1117-1130.
52. Milner AD. 1997. Neglect, extinction and the cortical streams of visual-processing. In: Thier P, Karnath HO, editors. Parietal lobe-contributions to orientation in 3D space. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Verlag. p. 3-22.
53. Milner AD. 1998a. Neuropsychological studies of perception and-visuomotor control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 353:1375-1384. (Pubitemid 28398203)
54. Milner AD. 1998b. Streams and consciousness: visual awareness and the-brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2:25-30. (Pubitemid 28389567)
55. Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2006. The visual brain in action. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
56. Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2008. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia. 46:774-785. (Pubitemid 351255549)
57. Milner AD, Harvey M. 1995. Distortion of size perception in visuospatial-neglect. Curr Biol. 5:85-89.
58. Milner AD, Harvey M. 2006. Visuomotor control of spatially directed-action. In: Vecchi T, Bottini G, editors. Imagery and spatial-cognition: methods, models and clinical assessment (Advances in-Consciousness Research, 66). Amsterdam (the Netherlands): John-Benjamins Publishers. p. 297-322.
59. Milner AD, Harvey M, Pritchard CL. 1998. Visual size processing in-spatial neglect. Exp Brain Res. 123:192-200. (Pubitemid 28495313)
60. Milner AD, Harvey M, Roberts RC, Forster SV. 1993. Line bisection-errors in visual neglect: misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia. 31:39-49. (Pubitemid 23068962)
61. Milner AD, McIntosh RD. 2005. The neurological basis of visual neglect. Curr Opin Neurol. 18:748-753. (Pubitemid 41669151)
62. Milner AD, Paulignan Y, Dijkerman HC, Michel F, Jeannerod M. 1999. A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new-evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:2225-2229. (Pubitemid 29532905)
63. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, Kennard C,-Husain M. 2003. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain. 126: 1986-1997. (Pubitemid 37059438)
64. Murphy KJ, Carey DP, Goodale MA. 1998. The perception of allocentric-spatial relationships in a visual form agnosic. Cogn Neuropsychol. 15:705-722. (Pubitemid 128527388)
65. Neely KA, Heath M. 2009. Visuomotor mental rotation: reaction time is-not a function of the angle of rotation. Neurosci Lett. 463:194-198.
66. Neggers SF, Van der Lubbe RH, Ramsey NF, Postma A. 2006. Interactions-between ego-and allocentric neuronal representations of space. Neuroimage. 31:320-331. (Pubitemid 43728999)
67. Ohgami Y, Matsuo K, Uchida N, Nakai T. 2004. An fMRI study of tool-use-gestures: body part as object and pantomime. Neuroreport. 15:1903-1906. (Pubitemid 39180610)
68. Prado J, Clavagnier S, Otzenberger H, Scheiber C, Kennedy H,-Perenin MT. 2005. Two cortical systems for reaching in central-and peripheral vision. Neuron. 48:849-858. (Pubitemid 41759434)
69. Pritchard CL, Milner AD, Dijkerman HC, MacWalter RS. 1997. Visuospatial neglect: veridical coding of size for grasping but not-for perception. Neurocase. 3:437-443. (Pubitemid 28102495)
70. Ptak R, Schnider A, Golay L, Muri R. 2007. A non-spatial bias favouring-fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect. Brain. 130:3211-3222. (Pubitemid 350209070)
71. Revol P, Rossetti Y, Vighetto A, Rode G, Boisson D, Pisella L. 2003. Pointing errors in immediate and delayed conditions in unilateral-optic ataxia. Spatial Vision. 16:347-364.
72. Rice Cohen NJ, Cross ES, Tunik E, Grafton ST, Culham JC. 2009. Ventral-and dorsal stream contributions to immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Neuropsychologia. 47:1553-1562.
73. Robertson IH. 2001. Do we need the "lateral" in unilateral neglect? Spatially nonselective attention deficits in unilateral neglect and-their implications for rehabilitation. Neuroimage. 14:S85-S90. (Pubitemid 32554534)
74. Robertson IH, Manly T, Beschin N, Daini R, Haeske-Dewick H,-Homberg V, Jehkonen M, Pizzamiglio G, Shiel A, Weber E. 1997. Auditory sustained attention is a marker of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 35:1527-1532. (Pubitemid 28031312)
75. Rorden C, Bonilla L, Nichols TE. 2007. Rank-order versus mean based-statistics for neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 35:7.
76. Rorden C, Brett M. 2000. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav-Neur. 12:191-200. (Pubitemid 32843166)
77. Rorden C, Karnath HO. 2004. Using human brain lesions to infer-function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat Rev Neurosci. 5:813-819. (Pubitemid 39336218)
78. Rorden C, Karnath HO, Bonilla L. 2007. Improving lesion-symptom-mapping. J Cogn Neurosci. 19:1081-1088.
79. Rossit S, Malhotra P, Muir K, Duncan G, Reeves I, Birschel P, Harvey M. 2009. The neural basis of visuomotor deficits in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 47:2149-2153.
80. RossitS,MalhotraP, Muir K, Reeves I, DuncanG,LivingstoneK,Jackson H,-Hogg C, Castle P, et al. 2009. No neglect-specific deficits in reaching-tasks. Cereb Cortex. 19:2616-2624.
81. Rossit S, Muir K, Reeves I, Duncan G, Birschel P, Harvey M. 2009. Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 47:1563-1572.
82. Rossit S, Szymanek L, Butler SH, Harvey M. 2010. Memory-guided-saccade processing in visual form agnosia (patient DF). Exp Brain-Res. 200:109-116.
83. Rumiati RI, Weiss PH, Shallice T, Ottoboni G, Noth J, Zilles K, Fink GR. 2004. Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented-objects. Neuroimage. 21:1224-1231. (Pubitemid 38446553)
84. Sapir A, Kaplan JB, He BJ, Corbetta M. 2007. Anatomical correlates of-directional hypokinesia in patients with hemispatial neglect. J Neurosci. 27:4045-4051. (Pubitemid 46597170)
85. Schenk T. 2006. An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient-D.F. Nat Neurosci. 9:1369-1370. (Pubitemid 44646208)
86. Shikata E, Hamzei F, Glauche V, Koch M, Weiller C, Binkofski F, Buchel C. 2003. Functional properties and interaction of the anterior and-posterior intraparietal areasin humans. EurJ Neurosci. 17:1105-1110. (Pubitemid 36411608)
87. Simon O, Mangin JF, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S. 2002. Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related-areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron. 33:475-487. (Pubitemid 34158849)
88. Singhal A, Kaufman L, Valyear K, Culham JC. 2006. fMRI reactivation of-the human lateral occipital complex during delayed actions to-remembered objects. Vis Cogn. 14:122-125.
89. Talairach J, Tournoux P. 1988. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human-brain: 3-dimensional proportional system-an approach to cerebral-imaging. New York: Thieme.
90. Tegner R, Levander M. 1991. Through a looking glass. A new technique-to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. Brain. 114:1943-1951.
91. Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad KO, Hauert CA, Vuilleumier P. 2010. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain. 133:880-894.
92. Walker R, Findlay JM, Young AW, Welch J. 1991. Disentangling neglect-and hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 29:1019-1027.
93. Westwood DA, Chapman CD, Roy EA. 2000. Pantomimed actions may-be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Exp Brain Res. 130:545-548. (Pubitemid 30088413)
94. Westwood DA, McEachern T, Roy EA. 2001. Delayed grasping of-a Muller-Lyer figure. Exp Brain Res. 141:166-173. (Pubitemid 33020845)
95. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan P. 1987. Behavioural inattention test. Titchfield (UK): Thames Valley Test Company.
96. Zaehle T, Jordan K, Wustenberg T, Baudewig J, Dechent P, Mast FW. 2007. The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial-frame of reference. Brain Res. 1137:92-103. (Pubitemid 46240050)