The effectiveness of anti-illicit-drug public-service announcements: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 834-840

  Werb, Dan ^a   Mills, Edward J ^a,b   DeBeck, Kora ^a   Kerr, Thomas ^a,c   Montaner, Julio S G ^a,c   Wood, Evan ^a,c  

^a BRITISH COLUMBIA CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIV AIDS   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STREET DRUG;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DATABASE; DRUG; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; META-ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC HEALTH; TELEVISION; TOBACCO;

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; META ANALYSIS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

CANNABIS SATIVA; NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 80955137532     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.125195     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Roy E, Haley N, Leclerc P, et al. Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among street youths. CMAJ 2001;165:557-60.
2. Edlin BR, Irwin KL, Faruque S, et al. Intersecting epidemicsdcrack cocaine use and HIV infection among inner-city young adults. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1422-7.
3. Ward H, Pallecaros A, Green A, et al. Health issues associated with increasing use of 'crack' cocaine among female sex workers in London. Sex Transm Infect 2000;76:292-3.
4. Orwin R, Cadell D, Chu A, et al. Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-drug Media Campaign: 2004 Report of Findings. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2004:1.
5. Pennay D, Blackmore D, Milat AJ, et al. National Drugs Campaign: Evaluation of Phase Two. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia, 2006.
6. Anon. FRANK Review: 2004e2006. London: Home Office, 2006.
7. Siegel M. Mass media antismoking campaigns: a powerful tool for health promotion. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:128-32.
8. Feingold PC, Knapp ML. Anti-drug abuse commercials. J Commun 1977;27:20-8.
9. ONDCP. FY2011 Budget Summary. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2010.
10. Government of Canada. National Anti-Drug Strategyd-Prevention. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2007.
11. Picard A. Clement Plans 'Plain Truth' Anti-drug Campaign. Toronto: Globe and Mail, 2007.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.
13. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE statement): a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
14. McCambridge J. A case study of publication bias in an influential series of reviews of drug education. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007;26:463-8.
15. Buchan I. StatsDirect Statistical Software. England: StatsDirect Ltd, 2008. http://www.statsdirect.com.
16. Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Lorch EP, et al. Sensation seeking, message sensation value, and drug use as mediators of PSA effectiveness. Health Commun 1991;3:217-27.
17. Donohew L. Sensation seeking and targeting of televised anti-drug PSAs. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. San Francisco: International Communication Association, 1989.
18. Harrington NG, Lane DR, Donohew L, et al. Persuasive strategies for effective anti-drug messages. Commun Monogr 2003;70:16-30.
19. Wagner CB, Sundar SS. The curiosity-arousing function of anti-drug ads. Open Comm J 2008;2:43-59.
20. Czyzewska M, Ginsburg H. Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements. Addict Behav 2007;32:114-27.
21. Yzer MC, Cappella JN, Fishbein M, et al. The effectiveness of gateway communications in anti-marijuana campaigns. J Health Commun 2003;8:129-43.
22. Fishbein M, Hall-Jamieson K, Zimmer E, et al. Avoiding the boomerang: testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. Am J Pub Health 2002;92:238-45.
23. David C, Cappella JN, Fishbein M. The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Comm Theor 2006;16:118-40.
24. Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Lorch EP, et al. Television campaigns and sensation seeking targeting of adolescent marijuana use: a controlled time-series approach. In: Public Health Communication: Evidence for Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2002:35,56.
25. Palmgreen P, Lorch EP, Stephenson MT, et al. Effects of the Office of National Drug Control Policy's Marijuana Initiative Campaign on high-sensation-seeking adolescents. Am J Pub Health 2007;97:1644-49.
26. UNODC. World Drug Report 2010. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2010:313.
27. GAO. ONDCP Media Campaign: Contractor's National Evaluation did not Find that the Youth Anti-drug Media Campaign was Effective in Reducing Youth Drug Use. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2006.
28. Johnston LD, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future: national results on adolescent drug use. Overview of Key Findings, 2006. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2007:76.
29. O'Neil P. Canada Looks to USA for Drug Policy Hints. Postmedia Network Inc., Toronto: Vancouver Sun, 2006.
30. Blendon RJ, Young JT. The public and the war on illicit drugs. JAMA 1998;279:827-32.
31. Bandura A. The Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
32. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. A Theory of Reasoned Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
33. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlab, 1985;2:11.
34. Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J. Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Market Theor 2002;2:29-113.
35. Olson JM, Zanna MP. Attitudes and attitude change. Annu Rev Psych 1993;44:117-54.
36. Brown SP, Stayman DM. Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: a meta-analysis. J Cons Res 1992;19:34-51.
37. Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Rothstein HR. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. BMJ 2008;336:1413-15.