Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Rhodes, Gillian ^a   Lie, Hanne C ^a   Thevaraja, Nishta ^a   Taylor, Libby ^a   Iredell, Natasha ^a   Curran, Christine ^a   Tan, Shi Qin Claire ^a   Carnemolla, Pia ^a   Simmons, Leigh W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO SEXUALITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACE PROFILE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FEMININITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MASCULINITY; MATING SUCCESS; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PREDICTION; RATING SCALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIDEORECORDING; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FACE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEAUTY; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80855156770     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026653     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, (2011) Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philos T Roy Soc B 366: 1638-1659.
2. Little AC, Perrett DI, (2011) Facial attractiveness. In: Adams RA, Ambady N, Nakayama K, Shimojo S, editors. The science of social vision Oxford Oxford University Press pp. 164-185.
3. Penton-Voak IS, Morrison ER, (2011) Structure, expression and motion in facial attractiveness. In: Calder AJ, Rhodes G, Johnson MH, Haxby JV, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception New York Oxford University Press pp. 653-672.
4. Rhodes G, (2006) The evolution of facial attractiveness. Annu Rev Psychol 57: 199-226.
5. Zebrowitz LA, (2011) Ecological and social approaches to face perception. In: Calder AJ, Rhodes G, Johnson MH, Haxby JV, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception Oxford Oxford University Press pp. 31-50.
6. Lander K, (2008) Relating visual and vocal attractiveness for moving and static faces. Anim Behav 75: 817-822.
7. Penton-Voak IS, Chang HY, (2008) Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions. J Evol Psychol 6: 89-100.
8. Rubenstein AJ, (2005) Variation in perceived attractiveness: Differences between dynamic and static faces. Psychol Sci 16: 759-762.
9. Roberts SC, Saxton TK, Murray AK, Burriss RP, Rowland HM, et al. (2009) Static and dynamic facial images cue similar attractiveness judgements. Ethology 115: 588-595.
10. Brown TA, Cash TF, Noles SW, (1986) Perceptions of physical attractiveness among college students: Selected determinants and methodological matters. J Soc Psychol 126 (3): 305-316.
11. Lie HC, Rhodes G, Simmons LW, (2008) Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution 62 (10): 2473-2486.
12. Rhodes G, Simmons L, Peters M, (2005) Attractiveness and sexual behaviour: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evol Hum Behav 26: 186-201.
13. Ong AD, Weiss DI, (2006) The impact of anonymity to responses to sensitive questions. J Appl Soc Psychol 30: 1691-1708.
14. Lie H, Rhodes G, Simmons L, (2010) Is genetic diversity associated with mating success in humans? Anim Behav 79: 903-909.
15. Peters M, Simmons L, Rhodes G, (2008) Testosterone is associated with mating success but not attractiveness or masculinity in human males. Anim Behav 76: 297-303.
16. Willis J, Todorov A, (2006) First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci 17 (7): 592-598.
17. Atkins DC, Gallop RJ, (2007) Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. J Fam Psychol 21: 726-735.
18. Dunteman GH, Ho RM, (2005) Generalized linear models: An introduction Newbury Park, California Sage Publications.
19. Morrison ER, Clark AP, Tiddeman BP, Penton-Voak IS, (2010) Manipulating shape cues in dynamic human faces: Sexual dimorphism is preferred in female but not male faces. Ethology 116: 1234-43.
20. Tracy JL, Beall AT, (2011) Happy guys finish last: The impact of emotion expressions on sexual attraction. Emotion in press.
21. Cunningham MR, Barbee AP, Pike CL, (1990) What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 59: 61-72.
22. Reis HT, Wilson IM, Monestere C, Bernstein S, Clark K, et al. (1990) What is smiling is beautiful and good. Eur J Soc Psychol 20: 259-267.
23. Valenzano DR, Mennucci A, Tartarelli G, Cellerino A, (2006) Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. Vision Res 46: 1282-1291.
24. Li NP, Kenrick DT, (2006) Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short term mates. J Pers Soc Psychol 90: 468-489.
25. Simmons LW, Rhodes G, Peters M, Koehler N, (2004) Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? Behav Ecol 15: 864-871.
26. Olson IR, Marshuetz C, (2005) Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion 5: 498-502.