Demand for open space and urban sprawl: The Case of Knox County, Tennessee

Advances in Spatial Science

Volumn 63, Issue , 2010, Pages 171-193

  Cho, Seong Hoon ^a   Lambert, Dayton M ^b   Roberts, Roland K ^b   Kim, Seung Gyu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855151523     PISSN: 14309602     EISSN: 21979375     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03326-1_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Acharya G, Bennett LL (2001) Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. J R Estate Finance Econ 22:221-237
2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht
3. Bates, LJ, Santerre RE (2001) The public demand for open space: The case of Connecticut communities. J Urban Econ 50:97-111
4. Bin O, Polasky S (2004) Effects of flood hazards on property values: evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Econ 80:490-500
5. Blaine TW, Lichtkoppler FR, Stanbro R (2003) An assessment of residents’ willingness to pay for green space and farmland preservation conservation easements using the contingent valuation method (CVM). J Ext 41 Available online: http://www.joe.org/joe/2003august/a3.shtml, 1 Oct. 2009
6. Blakely EJ (1994) Planning local economic development: Theory and practice, 2nd edn. SAGE, London
7. Breffle W, Morey E, Lodder T (1998) Using contingent valuation to estimate a neighborhood’s willingness to pay to preserve undeveloped urban land. Urban Stud 35:715-727
8. Brueckner JK (2000) Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. Int Region Sci Rev 23:160-171
9. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham A, Charlton M (1996) Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr Anal 28:281-298
10. Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF (2002) Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis. Growth Change 33:312-340
11. Cho S, Clark CD, Park WM (2006) Two dimensions of the spatial distribution of housing: dependency and heterogeneity across Tennessee’s six metropolitan statistical areas. J Agr Appl Econ 38:299-316
12. Cho S, Roberts RK (2007) Cure for urban sprawl: measuring the ratio of marginal implicit prices of density-to-lot-size. Rev Agr Econ 29:572-579
13. Cummings RO, Taylor LO (1999) Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am Econ Rev 89:649-665
14. Daniels T (2001) Smart growth: a new American approach to regional planning. Plann Pract Res 16:271-279
15. Dusansky R, Koc C, Onur I (2004) Is the demand curve for housing upward sloping? Working paper. Department of Economics/University of Texas at Austin
16. ESRI (2004) ESRI Data & Maps 2004. http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/datamaps2004.pdf, 1 Oct. 2009.
17. Ewing R, Pendall K, Chen D (2002) Measuring sprawl and its impact. Smart Growth America, Washington, DC
18. Flores NE, Carson RT (1997) The relationship between the income elasticities of demand and willingness to pay. J Environ Econ Manage 33:287-295
19. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, New Jersey
20. Frumkin H (2002) Urban sprawl and public health. Publ Health Re 117:201-217
21. Geoghegan J, Lynch L, Bucholtz S (2003) Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agr Res Econ Rev 32:33-45
22. Gordon P, Richardson HW (1998) Prove it. Brookings Rev 16:23-26
23. Gordon P, Richardson HW (2000) Critiquing sprawl’s critics. Policy Analysis No. 365, January 24
24. Gordon P, Richardson HW (2001a) Transportation and land use. Chapter 3 In: Holcombe R, Staley S (eds) Smarter growth: market-based strategies for land use planning in the 21st century. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT
25. Gordon P, Richardson HW (2001b) The sprawl debate: let markets plan. Publius J Federalism 31:131-149
26. Gujarati D (1995) Basic Econometrics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
27. Handy S (2005) Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: what does the research tell us? Int Region Sci Rev 28:146-167
28. Hanham R, Spiker JS (2005) Urban sprawl detection using satellite imagery and geographically weighted regression. In: Geospatial technologies in urban economics. Springer, Berlinthebe, pp 137-151
29. International City /County Management Association (2008) http://icma.org/, 1 Oct. 2009
30. Irwin EG (2002) The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Econ 78:465-80
31. Irwin EG, Bockstael NE (2001) The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. Am J Agr Econ 83:698-704
32. Iwata S, Murao H, Wang Q (2000) Nonparametric assessment of the effect of neighborhood land uses on residential house values. In: Thomas F, Hill RC (eds) Advances in econometrics: applying kernel and nonparametric estimation to economic topics. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp 229-257
33. Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J R Estate Finance Econ 17:99-121
34. KGIS (2009) Knox net where. Knoxville, Knox County, Knoxville Utilities Board Geographic Information System. http://www.kgis.org/KnoxNetWhere, 1 Oct. 2009
35. Krieger A (2005) The costs - And benefits? - of sprawl. In Saunders WS (ed) Sprawl and suburbia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 44-56
36. Lichtenberg E, Tra C, Hardie I (2007) Land use regulation and the provision of open space in suburban residential subdivisions. J Environ Econ Manage 54:199-213
37. Maddala GS (1983) Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, New York
38. Maddala GS (1992) Introduction to econometrics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
39. Mahan BL, Polasky S, Adams RM (2000) Valuing urban wetlands: A property price approach. Land Econ 76:100-113
40. McConnell V, Walls M (2005) The value of open space: Evidence from studies of non-market benefits. Working Paper, Resources for the Future, Washington DC
41. MPC (2001) Metropolitan Planning Commission. Tennessee public chapter 1101: growth plan for knoxville, Knox County, and Farragut, Tennessee. http://www.knoxmpc.org
42. Nechyba TJ, Walsh RP (2004) Urban sprawl. J Econ Perspect 18:177-200
43. Nelson N, Kramer E, Dorfman J, Bumback B (2004) Estimating the economic benefit of landscape pattern: an hedonic analysis of spatial landscape indices. Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Available online at http://www.rivercenter.uga.edu/publications.htm, 1 Oct. 2009
44. NLCD (2001) National Land Cover Database 2001. http://gisdata.usgs.net/website/MRLC/viewer.php, 1 Oct. 2009
45. OFHEO (2006) Office of federal housing enterprise oversight. http://www.ofheo.gov, 1 Oct. 2009
46. Open Space Inventory (1999) State of New York. www.nysaccny.org/content/cacinfo/article12f.pdf, 1 Oct. 2009
47. Rosenberger RS, Walsh RG (1997) Nonmarket value of western valley. Ranchland using contingent valuation. J Agr Res Eco 22:296-309
48. Skaburskis A (2000) Housing prices and housing density: Do higher prices make cities more compact? Can J Reg Sci 23:455-487
49. Sorg CF, Loomis JB, Donnelly DM, Peterson GL, Nelson LJ (1985) Net economic value of cold and warm water fishing in Idaho. USDA Forest Service, Resource Bulletin RM-11, p 26
50. Stevens T (1990) The economic value of bald eagles, wild turkeys, Atlantic salmon, and coyotes in New England. Resources and Environment: Management Choices. November report. Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
51. Stone L, Gibbins R. (2002) Tightening our beltways: urban sprawl in western Canada. A Western Cities Project Discussion Paper, the Canada West foundation, October 2002
52. Thorsnes P (2002) The value of a suburban forest preserve: Estimates from sales of vacant residential building lots. Land Econ 78:426-441
53. Tracy S (2003) Smart Growth Zoning Codes: A Resource Guide. Local Government Commission
54. Tyrväinen L, Väänänen H (1998) The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. Landsc Urban Plann 43:105-118
55. US Census Bureau (2002) Census 2000 Summary File 1 (Sf 1) 100-percent data, Tables pctl2 and pctl2b. http://www.factfinder.census.gov, Oct 1, 2009.
56. Walsh R (2007) Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium. J Urban Econ 61:319-344
57. Weitz J (1999) From quiet revolution to smart growth: atate growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. J Plann Lit 14:266-337