Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 319-344

  Walsh, Randy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846573755     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cheshire P., and Sheppard S. The welfare economics of land use planning. Journal of Urban Economics 5 (2006)
2. V. McConnell, M. Walls, The value of open space: Evidence from studies of nonmarket behavior, Technical report, Resources for the Future, 2005
3. Correll M., Lillydahl J., and Singell L. The effects of greenbelts on residential property values: Some findings on the political economy of open space. Land Economics 54 2 (1978) 207-217
4. Garrod G., and Willis K. Valuing goods' characteristics: An application of the hedonic price method to environmental attributes. Journal of Environmental Management 34 1 (1992) 59-76
5. Irwin E., and Bockstael N. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential properties. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 3 (2001) 698-704
6. Acharya G., and Bennett L. Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2001) 221-237
7. Bates L., and Santerre R. The public demand for open space: The case of Connecticut communities. Journal of Urban Economics 50 1 (2001) 97-111
8. Geoghegan J., Lynch L., and Bucholtz S. Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 23 (2003) 251-264
9. Bolitzer B., and Netusil N. The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Management 59 (2000) 185-193
10. Schultz S., and King D. The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open-space amenities and land use. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2001) 239-252
11. Smith V., Poulos C., and Kim H. Treating open space as an urban amenity. Resource and Energy Economics 24 (2002) 107-129
12. S. Anderson, S. West, Open space, residential property values, and spatial context, Regional Science and Urban Economics. In press
13. Brueckner J. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23 (2000) 160-171
14. Bento A., Franco S., and Kaffine D. The efficiency and distributional impacts of alternative anti-sprawl policies. Journal of Urban Economics 59 1 (2006) 121-141
15. Epple D., and Sieg H. Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy 107 4 (1999) 645-681
16. Epple D., Romer T., and Sieg H. Interjurisdictional sorting and majority rule: An empirical analysis. Econometrica 69 6 (2001) 1437-1465
17. Sieg H., Smith V., Banzhaf H., and Walsh R. Estimating the general equilibrium benefits of large changes in spatially delineated public goods. International Economic Review 45 4 (2004) 1047-1077
18. Willig R. Incremental consumer's surplus and hedonic price adjustment. Journal of Economic Theory 17 (1978) 227-253
19. Hanemann W. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52 (1984) 541-561
20. Poterba J. Taxation and housing: Old questions, new answers. American Economic Review 82 2 (1992) 237-242
21. R. Walsh, Analyzing open space policies in a computable locational equilibrium model, Dissertation, Duke University, 2002
22. P. Bayer, Exploring differences in the demand for school quality: An empirical analysis of school choice in California, Working paper, 2000
23. Berry S., Levinsohn J., and Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63 4 (1995) 841-890
24. P. Bayer, R. McMillan, K. Rueben, Exploring differences in the demand for school quality: An empirical analysis of school choice in California, Working paper, 2002
25. Nechyba T. Mobility, targeting and private school vouchers. American Economic Review 90 (2000) 130-146
26. M. Ferreyra, Estimating the effects of private school vouchers in multi-district economies, Working paper, 2001
27. Sirmans C., and Redman A. Capital land substitution and the price elasticity of demand for urban residential land. Land Economics 55 2 (1979)
28. Polinsky A. The demand for housing: A study in specification and grouping. Econometrica 45 2 (1977) 447-461
29. K. Wiebe, A. Tegene, Partial interests in land: Policy tools for resource use and conservation, Technical report, USDA Economic Research Service, 1996
30. Tegene A., Wiebe K., and Kuhn B. Irreversible investment under uncertainty: Conservation easements and the option to develop agricultural land. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 2 (1999) 203-219
31. Derr D., and Dhillon P. Purchase of Development Rights Program, the Northeast Experience (1999), Ashgate pp. 93-112
32. Nevo. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69 2 (2001) 307-342