Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 7557-7566

  Ruiz Mercado, Ilse ^a,b   Masera, Omar ^c   Zamora, Hilda ^c   Smith, Kirk R ^b  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO DE MATEMÁTICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Biomass fuel; Monitoring and evaluation; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION PROCESS; AVAILABLE FUELS; BIOMASS FUELS; COOKING SYSTEMS; CRITICAL PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS; GREENHOUSE GAS CONTRIBUTIONS; TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

AIR QUALITY; FUELS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDOOR AIR POLLUTION;

STOVES;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOMASS POWER; COOKING APPLIANCE; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; INDOOR AIR; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 80855143738     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Armendariz A.C., Edwards R., Johnson M., Zuk M., Serrano P., Rojas Bracho L., Riojas-Rodriguez H., Masera M. Reduction in particulate and carbon monoxide levels associated with the introduction of a Patsari improved cook stove in rural Mexico. Indoor Air. 2008, 18:93-105.
2. Arnold, M., Kohlin, G., Persson, R., ,Shepherd, G., 2003. Fuelwood Revisited: What has Changed Since the Last Decade? Occasional Paper no. 39, Bogor Barat, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonesia.
3. Agarwal B. Diffusion of rural innovations: some analytical issues ad the case of wood burning stoves. World Development 1983, 11(4):359-376.
4. Barnes, D., Qian, L., 1992. Urban Interfuel Substitution, Energy Use, and Equity in Developing Countries: Some Preliminary Results. Industry and Energy Department Working Paper, Energy Series Paper #53, The World Bank,Washington, DC.
5. Climate Care, 2010. Indicative Programme, Baseline, and Monitoring Methodology for Improved Cook-Stoves and Kitchen Regimes.
6. Dearing J.W. Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on social work practice 2009, 19(5):503-518.
7. Dowd, J. 1989. The Urban Energy Transition and Interfuel Substitution in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature. Internal Report, ESMAP, World Bank, Washington, DC.
8. Eckholm, E.P., 1975. The other Energy Crisis. Worldwatch Institute. Paper no. 1. Washington, DC.
9. Fitzgerald, B., Barnes, D., McGranahan. G., 1990. Interfuel Substitution and Changes in the Way Households Use Energy: The Case of Cooking and Lighting Behavior in Urban Java. The World Bank Industry and Energy Department, Working paper #29. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
10. Gifford, Mary Louise, 2010. A Global Review of Cookstove Programs. MS. Thesis Energy and Resources Group UC Berkeley, CA.
11. Grupp M., Balmer M., Beall B., Bergler H., Cieslok J., Hancock D., Schröder G. On-line recording of solar cooker use rate by a novel metering device: prototype description and experimental verification of output data. Solar Energy 2009, 83:276-279.
12. Helps International, 2011. Helps International. 〈〉 (accessed on January 9, 2011). http://www.helpsintl.org/programs/stove.php.
13. Heltberg R. Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries. Energy Economics 2004, 26:869-887.
14. Heltberg R. Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala. Environmental and Development Economics 2005, 10:337-361.
15. Hessen O.H., Schel M.A., Pandey M.R. Motivational factors related to improving indoor air quality in rural Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 2001, 21(2):148-153.
16. Hiemstra-van der Horst, Hovorka Reassessing the "energy ladder": household energy use in Maun, Botswana. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3333-3334.
17. Hosier R.H., Dowd J. Household fuel choice in Zimbabwe: an empirical test of the energy ladder hypothesis. Resources Energy 1988, 9:337-361.
18. Johnson M., Edwards R., Ghilardi A., Berrueta V., Gillen D., Frenk C.A., Masera O. Quantification of carbon savings from improved biomass cookstove projects. Environmental Science and Technology 2009, 43:2456-2462.
19. Joon V., Chandra A., Bhattacharya M. Household energy consumption pattern and socio-cultural dimensions associated with it: a case study of rural Haryana, India. Biomass and Bioenergy 2009, 33:1509-1512.
20. Masera O.R. Crisis y Mecanizacion de la Agricultura Campesina 1990, Programa de Ciencia y Tecnologia, El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico City.
21. Masera, O., 1994. Socioeconomic and Environmental Implications of Fuelwood Use Dynamics and Fuel Switching in Rural Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis, Energy and Resources Group, University of California Berkeley.
22. Masera O., Navia J. Fuel switching or multiple cooking fuels? Understanding inter-fuel substitution patterns in rural Mexican households. Biomass and Bioenergy 1997, 12(5):347-361.
23. Masera O., Saatkamp B.D., Kammen D.M. From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: a critique and alternative to the energy ladder model. World Development 2000, 28(12):2083-2103.
24. Masera O.R., Diaz-Jimenez R., Berrueta V. From coookstoves to cooking systems: the integrated program on sustainable household energy use in Mexico. Energy for Sustainable Development 2005, IX(1). India.
25. Masera O., Edwards R., Armendáriz C., Berrueta V., Johnson M., Rojas L., Riojas-Rodríguez H. Impact of "Patsari" improved cookstoves on Indoor Air Quality in Michoacan, Mexico. Energy For Sustainable Development 2007, 11:45-56.
26. Murphy J.T. Making the energy transition in rural East Africa: is leapfrogging an alternative?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2001, 68:173-193.
27. Overdijk, M., Van Diggelen, W., 2006. Technology Appropriation in face-to-face Collaborative Learning. In: Tomadaki, E., Scott, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, vol. 8, 2007, pp. 566-568.
28. Pandey S., Yadama Y.N. Community-development programs in Nepal-a test of diffusion of innovations theory. Social Service Review 1992, 66(4):582-597.
29. Pareek U., Chattopadhyay S.N. Adoption quotient: a measure of multipractice adoption behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1966, 2(1):95-108.
30. Pine, K.H., Edwards, R., Masera, O., Schilmann, A., Riojas-Rodriguez. Adoption and use of improved biomass stoves in rural Mexico. Energy for Sustainable Development, accepted for publication.
31. Prins R., Verhoef P.C., Franses P.H. The impact of adoption timing on new service usage and early disadoption. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2009, 26:304-313.
32. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, The Free Press, New York. fifth ed.
33. Ruiz-Mercado I., Lam N., Canuz E., Davila G., Smith K.R. Low-cost temperature loggers as stove use monitors (SUMS). Boiling Point 2008, 55:16-18.
34. Ruiz-Mercado, I., Canuz, E., Acevedo, Smith, K.R. Stove use monitors (SUMs) to quantify the adopton and sustained use of improved cookstoves. Biomass and Bioenergy, submitted for publication.
35. Shih C.F., Venkatesh A. Beyond adoption: development and application of a use-diffusion model. Journal of Marketing 2004, 68(1):59-72.
36. Sinton J.E., Smith K.R., Peabody J.W., Yaping L., Xiliang Z., Edwards R., Quan G. An assessment of programs to promote improved household stoves in China. Energy for Sustainable Development 2004, 8(3):33-52.
37. Smith K.R., Shuhua G., Huang K., Daxiong Q. One hundred million improved cookstoves in China: How was it done?. World Development 21, p. 941 1993.
38. Smith, K.R., Metha, S., Maeusezahl-Feuz, M., 2004. Indoor smoke from household solid fuels. In: Ezzati, M., Rodgers, A.D., Lopez, A.D., Murray, C.J.L. (Eds.), Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease due to Selected Major Risk Factors, vol. 2. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp. 1435-1493.
39. Smith K.R., Bruce N.G., Arana B., 2006. RESPIRE: the Guatemala randomized intervention trial. In: Proceedings of the Symposium MS3 at the ISEE/ISEA Annual Conference, Paris, Epidemiology 17(6) , pp. S44-46 (Suppl.).
40. Smith K.R., Haigler E. Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: scoping methods. Annual Review of Public Health 2008, 29:11-25.
41. Smith K.R., McCracken J.M., Thompson L., Edwards R., Shields K.N., Canuz E., Bruce N. 2009. Personal child and mother carbon monoxide exposures and kitchen levels: methods and results from a randomized trial of wood fired chimney cookstoves in Guatemala (RESPIRE), Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.
42. Troncoso K., Castillo A., Masera O., Merino L. Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking: case study in rural Mexico. Energy Policy 2007.
43. UNFCCC, 2009. AMS-I.E: Switch from Non-Renewable Biomass for Thermal Applications by the User and AMS-II.G: Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal Applications of Non-Renewable Biomass.
44. Valencia, A., 2004. Improved Cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico: A Search for an integrated Perspective that Promotes Local Culture, Health, and Sustainability. MS Thesis, Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley.
45. Venkataraman V., Sagar A.D., Habib G., Lam N., Smith K.R. The Indian National initiative for advanced biomass cookstoves: the benefits of clean combustion. Energy for Sustainable Development 2010, 14:63-72.
46. Wilson C., Dowlatabadi H. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 2007, 32:169-203.
47. Zamora, H. 2010. Impactos Socio-Ecológicos Del uso Sostenido de Estufas Eficientes de leña en Comunidades de Michoacán. México, Tesis de maestria, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.