An examination of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 469-476

  Gucciardi, Daniel F ^a   Jalleh, Geoffrey ^b   Donovan, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Doping in sport; Doping susceptibility; Performance enhancing drugs

Indexed keywords

PERFORMANCE ENHANCING SUBSTANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; AUSTRALIA; DOPING; DRUG CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF ESTEEM; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SPORT DRUG CONTROL MODEL; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; THREAT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATHLETES; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; DOPING IN SPORTS; DRUG AND NARCOTIC CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORALS; PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING SUBSTANCES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80855132887     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: 18781861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Donovan R.J., Egger G., Kapernick V., et al. A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport. Sports Med 2002, 32(4):269-284.
2. Performance enhancing substances in sport and exercise 2002, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. M.S. Bahrke, C.E. Yesalis (Eds.).
3. Backhouse S., McKenna J., Robinson S., et al. Attitudes, behaviours, knowledge and education - drugs in sport: past present and future 2007, World Anti-Doping Agency, Canada.
4. Strelan P., Boeckmann R. Why drug testing in elite sport does not work: perceptual deterrence theory and the role of personal moral beliefs. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006, 36(12):2909-2934.
5. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1991, 50(2):179-211.
6. Lucidi F., Zelli A., Mallia L., et al. The social-cognitive mechanism regulating adolescents' use of doping substances. J Sport Sci 2008, 26(5):447-456.
7. Stewart B., Smith A. Drug use in sport: implications for public policy. J Sport Soc Issues 2008, 32(3):278-298.
8. Petróczi A., Aidman E.V. Psychological drivers of doping: the life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2008, 3:7.
9. Mazanov J., Huybers T. An empirical model of athlete decisions to use performance-enhancing drugs: qualitative evidence. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2010, 2(3):385-402.
10. Elder J.P., Geller E.S., Hovell M.F., et al. Motivating health behavior 1994, Delmar, New York.
11. Wasserheit J.N., Aral S.O., Holmes K.K., et al. Research issues in human behavior and sexually transmitted diseases in the AIDS era 1991, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
12. Graeff J.A., Elder J.P., Booth E.M. Communication for health and behavior change: a developing country perspective 1993, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
13. O'Keefe D.J. Persuasion: theory and research 1990, Sage, San Francisco, CA.
14. Donovan R.J., Henley N. Negative outcomes, threats and threat appeals: towards a conceptual framework for the study of fear and other emotions in social marketing communications. Soc Mark Q 1997, 4(1):56-67.
15. Petróczi A., Aidman E.V. Measuring explicit attitude as an indicator of athletes' engagement in doping: review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale. Psychol Sport Exerc 2009, 10(3):390-396.
16. Donovan R.J. Towards an understanding of factors influencing athletes' attitudes towards performance enhancing technologies: implications for ethics education. Performance-enhancing technologies in sport: ethical, conceptual and scientific issues 2009, The Johns Hopkins University Press, [chapter 6].
17. Rosenberg M. Society and adolescent self-image 1965, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
18. Lee M.J., Whitehead J., Ntoumanis N. Development of the attitudes to moral decision-making in youth sport questionnaire (AMDMYS). Psychol Sport Exerc 2007, 8(3):369-392.
19. Tabachnick B.S., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics 2007, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA. 5th ed.
20. Graham J.W. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol 2009, 60:549-576.
21. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999, 6(1):1-55.
22. Gucciardi D.F., Jalleh G., Donovan R.J. Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes?. Psychol Sport Exerc 2010, 11(6):479-486.
23. Nunnally J., Bernstein I. Psychometric theory 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming 2010, Routledge, New York. 2nd ed.
25. Kavussanu M. Morality in sport. Social psychology in sport 2007, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, [chapter 19].
26. Olrich T.W., Ewing M.E. Life on steroids: bodybuilders describe their perceptions of the anabolic androgenic steroid use period. Sport Psychol 1999, 13(3):299-312.
27. Moran A., Guerin S., MacIntyre T., et al. Why do athletes cheat? An investigation of Irish athletes' understanding of and attitudes to cheating behaviour (including doping) in sport 2004, Commissioned research report to Irish Sports Council, Dublin, Ireland.
28. Bull N.J. Moral judgement from childhood to adolescence 2010, Routledge, London.
29. Miller M. Why shock ads catch the eye more than the mind. B&T 1992;(April 10):18-19.
30. Donovan R.J., Jalleh G., Henley N. Executing effective road safety advertising: are big production budgets necessary?. Accident Anal Prev 1999, 31(3):243-252.
31. Laure P., Binsinger C. Doping prevalence among preadolescent athletes: a 4-year follow-up. Brit J Sport Med 2007, 41(10):660-663.
32. Alaranta A., Alaranta H., Holmila J., et al. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. Int J Sports Med 2006, 27(10):842-846.