Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: A review of the mini-incision and MIS literature

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 5-18

  Levine, Brett R ^a   Klein, Gregg R ^a   Di Cesare, Paul E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CEMENT;

HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; STANDARD; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33947276332     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Watson-Jones R. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg. 1936;23:787-808.
2. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:17-9.
3. Gibson A. Posterior exposure of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32(2):183-6.
4. Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(4):690-5.
5. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, et al. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: Factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(2):171-7.
6. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty in patients under the age of 51 years. Follow-up to 33 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):540-3.
7. Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: In the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):78-80.
8. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ, Berland KA, et al. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 4):33-8.
9. Dorr LD. The mini-incision hip: Building a ship in a bottle. Orthopedics. 2004;27(2):192, 194.
10. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(417):232-41.
11. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, et al. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(8):945-50.
12. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(11):2235-46.
13. Hungerford DS. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: In opposition. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):81-82.
14. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: A comparative assessment of peri-operative outcomes. Orthopedics. 2002;25(10):1031-43.
15. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ. Posterior-lateral approach to minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):131-6.
16. Jando VT, Duncan CP. Two-incision technique for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop. 2004;14(2):102-10.
17. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):163-72.
18. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N, et al. Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004;28(4):214-7.
19. Archibeck MJ, White RE Jr. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(429):232-8.
20. Pagnano MW, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-inicision THA in 80 consecutive unselected patients: Prevalence of complications. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting; Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
21. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: A comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):153-62.
22. Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: A modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(429):248-55.
23. Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: Technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):119-29.
24. Irving JF. Direct two-incision total hip replacement without fluoroscopy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):173-181.
25. Ilizaliturri VMJ, Chaidez PA, Valero FS, et al. Small incision total hip replacement by the lateral approach using standard instruments. Orthopedics. 2004;27(4):377-81.
26. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: A study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Rela Res. 2004;(426):164-73.
27. Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: The Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):137-42.
28. Sherry E, Egan M, Henderson A, et al. Minimally invasive techniques for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(8):1481; Author reply, 1481-2.
29. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(429):239-47.
30. Sculco TP, Jordan LC. The mini-incision approach to total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:141-7.
31. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(5):538-45.
32. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(2):123-8.
33. Woolson ST, Mow CS. Cosmetic appearance of mini-versus standard-length total hip incisions. Presented at the Hip Society Annual Meeting, Santa Fe, NM, October 6-10, 2004.
34. Smith-Petersen MN. Approach and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31:40-6.
35. Matta JM. Anterior approach for THA on the orthopedic table. Presented at the Hip Society Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, September 22-24, 2005.
36. Rachbauer F, Nogler M, Krismer M, et al. Minimal invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior single incision approach. Paper presented at: 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
37. McFarland B, Osborne G. Approach to the hip. A suggested improvement on Kocher's method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1954;36B(3):364-7.
38. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, et al. A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(7):737-46.
39. Moskal JT, Mann JW 3rd. A modified direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis of 453 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11(3):255-66.
40. Frndak PA, Mallory TH, Lombardi AV Jr. Translateral surgical approach to the hip. The abductor muscle "split." Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(295):135-41.
41. Abitbol JJ, Gendron D, Laurin CA, et al. Gluteal nerve damage following total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5(4):319-22.
42. Obrant KJ, Ringsberg K, Sanzen L. Decreased abduction strength after Charnley hip replacement without trochanteric osteotomy. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60(3):305-7.
43. Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, et al. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: A prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(3):215-20.
44. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: Direct lateral or posterior? J Rheumatol. 2004;31(9):1790-6.
45. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003828.
46. Ritter MA, Harry LD, Keating ME, et al. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(385):95-9.
47. Demos HA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, et al. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):168-80.
48. Mallory TH, Lombardi AV Jr, Fada RA, et al. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(358):166-72.
49. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(405):46-53.
50. Higuchi F, Gotoh M, Yamaguchi N, et al. Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(6):812-7.
51. Moore AT. The self locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957;39:811-27.
52. Marcy GH, Fletcher RS. Modification of the posterolateral approach to the hip for insertion of femoral head prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:142-3.
53. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64(9):1295-306.
54. Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ. A posterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):162-7.
55. Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(355):224-8.
56. Ko CK, Law SW, Chiu KH. Enhanced soft tissue repair using locking loop stitch after posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(2):207-11.
57. Hedley AK, Hendren DH, Mead LP. A posterior approach to the hip joint with complete posterior capsular and muscular repair. J Arthroplasty 1990;5(Suppl):S57-66.
58. Osmani ON, Walz B, Baker D, et al. Posterior capsular repair decreases incidence of dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty. Presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, March 10-14, 2004.
59. Waldman BJ. Minimally invasive total hip replacement and peri-operative management: Early experience. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11(4):213-7.
60. Lester DK, Helm M. Mini-incision posterior approach for hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol. 2001;4:245-53.
61. Dorr LD. Single-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2003;85(11):2236-8.
62. Chung WK, Liu D, Foo LS. Mini-incision total hip replacement-surgical technique and early results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2004; 12(1): 19-24.
63. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(7):1353-8.
64. Goldstein WM, Ali R, Murphy SI, et al. Patient priorities and importance of cosmesis after THA: Standard versus minimal incision. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
65. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve postoperative outcomes: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701-10.
66. Murphy SB. Technique of tissue-preserving, minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty using a superior capsulotomy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2004;14(2):94-101.
67. Murphy SB. Alumina ceramic-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using computer-assisted surgical navigation and a new minimally invasive technique. In: Lazennec JY, Dietrich M (eds): Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff Verlag, 2004, pp 61-64.
68. Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:149-55.
69. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 4):39-48.
70. Mears DC. Development of a two-incision minimally invasive total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(11):2238-40.
71. Duwelius PJ, Berger RA, Hartzband MA, et al. Two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Operative technique and early results from four centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(11):2240-2.
72. Bal BS, Haltom JD. Complications associated with the two-incision technique in primary total hip arthroplasty. Paper presented at: 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
73. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision minimally invasive and mini-posterior techniques. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
74. Nivbrant B, Khan R, Wood DJ, et al. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
75. Noble PC, Johnston JD, Alexander JW, et al. The pathomechanics of femoral fractures occurring during MIS THA performed via a dual incision. Presented at the Hip Society Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, September 22-25, 2005.
76. Berry DJ. "minimally invasive" total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87A:699-700.
77. Labovitch RS, Bozic K: The quality of information on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip replacement. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.
78. Klein GR, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty internet claims made by hip society members. Presented at the Hip Society Annual Meeting, Santa Fe, NM, October 6-10, 2004.
79. Fehring TK, Mason JB. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:711-4.
80. DiGioia AM 3rd, Blendea S, Jaramaz B, et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty using navigational tools. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:157-64.