Schedule-based transit assignment model with vehicle capacity and seat availability

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1805-1830

  Hamdouch, Younes ^a   Ho, H W ^b   Sumalee, Agachai ^b   Wang, Guodong ^b  

^a UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Capacity; Schedule based; Transit assignment; Transit seat allocation; Travel strategy; User equilibrium

Indexed keywords

ITERATIVE METHODS; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES; VEHICLES;

CAPACITY; SEAT ALLOCATION; TRANSIT ASSIGNMENT; TRAVEL STRATEGY; USER EQUILIBRIUM;

TRANSPORTATION;

MODELING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 80455174665     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alfa A.S., Chen M.Y. Temporal distribution of public transport demand during the peak period. European Journal of Operational Research 1995, 83(1):137-153.
2. Cepeda M., Cominetti R., Florian M. A frequency-based assignment model for congested tansit networks with strict capacity constraints: characterization and computation of equilibrium. Transportation Research Part B 2006, 40(6):437-459.
3. De Cea J., Fernandez E. Transit assignment for congested public transport system: an equilibrium model. Transportation Science 1993, 27(2):133-147.
4. Facchinei F., Pang J.-S. Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems 2003, vols. I & II. Springer, New York.
5. Hamdouch Y., Marcotte P., Nguyen S. A strategic model for dynamic traffic assignment. Networks and Spatial Economics 2004, 4(3):291-315.
6. Hamdouch Y., Lawphongpanich S. Schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and capacity constraints. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(7-8):663-684.
7. Kurauchi F., Bell M.G.H., Schmoecker J.-D. Capacity constrained transit assignment with common lines. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms 2003, 2(4):309-327.
8. Kittelson & Associates, KFH Group Inc., Pearson Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglass Inc., Hunter-Zaworski, K., 2003. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, second ed., TCRP Report 100, Transportation Research Board.
9. Lam W.H.K., Gao Z.Y., Chan K.S., Yang H. A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks. Transportation Research Part B 1999, 33(5):351-368.
10. Leurent F. On seat capacity in traffic assignment to a transit network. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2010, 10.1002/atr.146.
11. Leurent, F., Liu, K., 2009. On seat congestion, passenger comfort and route choice in urban transit: a network equilibrium assignment model with application to Paris. In: Proceeding of the 88th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 11-15 January, 2009.
12. Lo H.K., Yip C.W., Wan K.H. Modeling transfer and non-linear fare structure in multi-modal network. Transportation Research Part B 2003, 37(2):149-170.
13. Marcotte P., Nquven S., Schoeb A. A strategic flow model of traffic assignment in static capacitated networks. Operations Research 2004, 52(2):191-212.
14. Moller-Pedersen, J., 1999. Assignment model of timetable based systems (TPSCHEDULE). In: Proceedings of 27th European Transportation Forum, Seminar F, Cambridge, England, pp. 159-168.
15. Nguyen S., Pallottino S., Malucelli F. A modeling framework for passenger assignment on a transport network with timetables. Transportation Science 2001, 35(3):238-249.
16. Nuzzolo A., Russo F., Crisalli U. A doubly dynamic schedule-based assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Science 2001, 35(3):268-285.
17. Poon M.H., Wong S.C., Tong C.O. A dynamic schedule-based model for congested transit networks. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(4):343-368.
18. Spiess H., Florian M. Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Research Part B 1989, 23(2):83-102.
19. Schmoecker J.-D., Bell M.G.H., Kurauchi F. A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(10):925-945.
20. Schmoecker, J-D., Bell, M.G.H., Kurauchi, F., Shimamoto, H., 2009. Frequency-based assignment with consideration of seat availability. In: 11th International Conference on Advanced Systems for Public Transport, Hong Kong.
21. Sumalee A., Tan Z., Lam W.H.K. Dynamic stochastic transit assignment with explicit seat allocation model. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43(8-9):895-912.
22. Sumi T., Matsumoto Y., Miyaki Y. Departure time and route choice of commuters on mass transit systems. Transportation Research Part B 1990, 24(4):247-262.
23. Tian Q., Huang H.J., Yang H. Equilibrium properties of the morning peak-period commuting in a many-to-one mass transit system. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41(6):616-631.
24. Tian Q., Huang H.J., Yang H. Commuting equilibria on a mass transit system with capacity constraint. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2007, 360-383. Elsevier.
25. Tong C.O., Wong S.C. A stochastic transit assignment model using a dynamic schedule-based network. Transportation Research Part B 1998, 33(2):107-121.
26. Wu J.H., Florian M., Marcotte P. Transit equilibrium assignment: a model and solution algorithms. Transportation Science 1994, 28(3):193-203.