Institutional continuity and the dutch construction industry fiddle

Organization Studies

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1559-1585

  Sminia, Harry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

collusion; construction industry; institutional change; institutional continuity; institutional theory; practices; social mechanism; structuration

Indexed keywords

EID: 80355129263     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840611425724     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Barley S. R.,Tolbert P. S.Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution.Organization Studies. 1997;18:93-117.
2. Beckert J.Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutional practices in organizations.Organization Studies. 1999;20:777-799.
3. Blackler F.Knowledge and the theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management.Journal of Management Studies. 1993;30:863-884.
4. Blackler F.Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation.Organization Studies. 1995;16:1021-1046.
5. Blackler F.,Crump N.,McDonald S.Organizing processes in complex activity networks.Organization. 2000;7:277-300.
6. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.Organization Science. 1991;2:40-57.
7. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective.Organization Science. 2001;12:198-213.
8. Czarniawska B.Emerging institutions: Pyramids or anthills.Organization Studies. 2009;30:423-441.
9. Dacin M. T.,Goodstein J.,Scott W. R.Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum.Academy of Management Journal. 2002;45:45-57.
10. Déjean F.,Gond J. P.,Leca B.Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry.Human Relations. 2004;57:741-764.
11. DiMaggio P. J. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional patterns and organizations. Zucker L., ed. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1988:3-22.
12. DiMaggio P. J.,Powell W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review. 1983;48:147-160.
13. Dorado S.Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening.Organization Studies. 2005;26:385-414.
14. Dougherty D.A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation.Strategic Management Journal. 1992;13:77-92.
15. Eisenhardt K. M.Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:532-550.
16. Elster J.Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989:.
17. Emirbayer M.,Mische A.What is agency?.American Journal of Sociology. 1998;103:962-1023.
18. Feldman M. S.Organizational routines as a source of continuous change.Organization Science. 2000;16:611-629.
19. Feldman M. S.,Pentland B. T.Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003;48:94-118.
20. Feldman M. S.,Rafaeli A.Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings.Journal of Management Studies. 2002;39:310-331.
21. Fligstein N.Social skill and institutional theory.American Behavioral Scientist. 1997;40:397-405.
22. Fligstein N.Social skill and theory of fields.Sociological Theory. 2001;19:105-125.
23. Garud R.,Hardy C.,Maguire S.Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue.Organization Studies. 2007;28:957-969.
24. Garud R.,Jain S.,Kumaraswamy A.Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java.Academy of Management Journal. 2002;45:196-214.
25. Gherardi S.,Nicolini D.Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance.Journal of Management Studies. 2002;39:419-436.
26. Giddens A.Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan; 1979:.
27. Giddens A.The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1984:.
28. Greenwood R.,Hinings C. R.Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism.Academy of Management Review. 1996;21:1022-1054.
29. Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin A.,Suddaby R.Introduction. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin K.Suddaby R., ed. London: Sage; 2008:1-46.
30. Greenwood R.,Suddaby R.Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;48:27-48.
31. Gross N.A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms.American Sociological Review. 2009;74:358-379.
32. Hargadon A. B.,Douglas Y.When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light'.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2001;46:476-501.
33. Hedström P.,Swedberg R. Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Hedström P.Swedberg R., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:1-31.
34. Hensmans M.Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields.Organization Studies. 2003;24:355-381.
35. Holm P.The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995;40:423-443.
36. Jarzabkowski P.Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use.Organization Studies. 2004;25:529-560.
37. Jarzabkowski P.Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage; 2005:.
38. Jarzabkowski P.,Spee A. P.Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field.International Journal of Management Reviews. 2009;11:69-95.
39. Jepperson R. L. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:143-163.
40. Johnson G.,Melin L.,Whittington R.Guest editors' introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view.Journal of Management Studies. 2003;40:3-22.
41. Kondra A. Z.,Hinings C. R.Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory.Organization Studies. 1998;19:743-767.
42. Lave J.,Wenger E.Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
43. Law J.Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity.Systems Practice. 1992;5:379-393.
44. Lawrence T. R.,Suddaby R.Handbook of organization studies. 2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-255), 2nd edition. London: Sage.Clegg S. R.Hardy C.Lawrence T. B.Nord W. R., ed. London: Sage; 2006:215-255.
45. Leblebici H.,Salancik G. R.,Copay A.,King T.Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991;36:333-363.
46. Lounsbury M.A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:289-307.
47. Lounsbury M.,Crumley E.New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation.Organization Studies. 2007;28:993-1012.
48. Lounsbury M.,Ventresca M.,Hirsch P. M.Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling.Socio-Economic Review. 2003;1:71-104.
49. Maguire S.,Hardy C.,Lawrence T. B.Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada.Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:657-679.
50. Mahoney J.Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method.Sociological Forum. 2001;16:575-593.
51. Mayntz R.Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2004;34:237-259.
52. Meyer J. W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83:340-363.
53. Munir K. A.,Phillips N.The birth of the 'Kodak moment': Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies.Organization Studies. 2005;26:1665-1687.
54. Mutch A.Communities of practice and habitus: A critique.Organization Studies. 2003;24:383-401.
55. Mutch A.Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: A historical exploration.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1123-1140.
56. Oliver C.Strategic responses to institutional processes.Academy of Management Review. 1991;16:145-179.
57. Oliver C.The antecedents of deinstitutionalization.Organization Studies. 1992;13:563-588.
58. Oliver C.Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views.Strategic Management Journal. 1997;18:697-713.
59. Olson M.The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1965:.
60. Orlikowski W. J.Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing.Organization Science. 2002;13:249-273.
61. Orr J. E.Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1996:.
62. Pentland B. T.,Feldman M. S.Organizational routines as a unit of analysis.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005;14:793-815.
63. Reckwitz A.Towards a theory of social practice: A development in cultural theorizing.European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5:243-263.
64. Schatzki T. R. Introduction: Practice theory. The practice turn in contemporary theory. Schatzki T. R.Knorr-Cetina K.von Savigny E., ed. London: Routledge; 2001:1-14.
65. Schatzki T. R.The sites of organizations.Organization Studies. 2005;26:465-484.
66. Scott W. R.The adolescence of institutional theory.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1987;32:493-511.
67. Scott W. R.Institutions and organizations. 2001). Institutions and organizations, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001:.
68. Seo M. G.,Creed W. E. D.Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective.Academy of Management Review. 2002;27:222-247.
69. Sewell W. H.A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation.American Journal of Sociology. 1992;98:1-29.
70. Spender J-C. Organizations are activity systems, not merely systems of thought. Advances in Strategic Management. Shrivastava C.Stubbart C., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1995:153-181.
71. Strauss A. L.,Corbin J.Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:.
72. Suchman M. C.Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches.Academy of Management Review. 1995;20:571-610.
73. Sztompka P.Society in action: The theory of social becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1991:.
74. Thornton P. H.,Ocasio W.Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990.American Journal of Sociology. 1999;105:801-843.
75. Thornton P. H.,Ocasio W. Institutional logics. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin K.Suddaby R., ed. London: Sage; 2008:99-129.
76. Tolbert P. S. Institutional sources of organizational culture in major law firms. Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Zucker L. G., ed. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1988:101-113.
77. Tolbert P. S.,Zucker L. The institutionalization of institutional theory. Handbook of organization studies. Clegg S. R.Hardy C.Nord W. R., ed. London: Sage; 1996:175-190.
78. Tsoukas H.The validity of idiographic research explanations.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:551-561.
79. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Eindrapport Parlementaire Enquêtecommissie Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 6. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003a:.
80. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Verhoren 1 t/m 38, 28 244, no. 7. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003b:.
81. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Verhoren 39 t/m 67, 28 244, no. 7. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003c:.
82. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 1: Economische Structuurkenmerken van de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 8. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003d:.
83. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 2: Aard en Omvang van Onregelmatigheden in de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 9. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003e:.
84. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 3: Casuistiek uit de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 10. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003f:.
85. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 4: Juridische Aspecten van de Aanbesteding, Mededinging en Contractering in de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 11. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003g:.
86. Enquête bouwnijverheid. Deelproject 5: De Rol van de Overheid in de Bouwnijverheid, 28 244, no. 12. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgevers; 2003h:.
87. Van de Ven A. M.Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007:.
88. Vulperhorst L.Verzwegen onderneming: ondernemers, overheid en het einde van het bouwkartel (2001-2005). Amsterdam: Van Gennep; 2005:.
89. Wenger E.Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
90. Whittington R.Completing the practice turn in strategy research.Organization Studies. 2006;27:613-634.
91. Williamson O. E.Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press; 1975:.
92. Zucker L. G.Institutional theories of organizations.Annual Review of Sociology. 1987;13:443-464.
93. Zucker L. G. Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Zucker L. G., ed. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1988:23-49.