Novel apparatus and method for drug reinforcement

Journal of Visualized Experiments

Volumn , Issue 42, 2010, Pages

  Feduccia, Allison A ^a   Duvauchelle, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80355124341     PISSN: 1940087X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3791/1998     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Sanchis-Segura, C. and Spanagel, R., Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: an overview. Addict Biol 11 (1), 2 (2006).
2. Tzschentke, T. M., Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol 12 (3-4), 227 (2007).
3. Koob, G. F., in Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress, edited by K.D. Bloom (Raven Press, New York, 1995), pp. 759.
4. Bardo, M. T. and Bevins, R. A., Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153 (1), 31 (2000).
5. Panlilio, L. V. and Goldberg, S. R., Self-administration of drugs in animals and humans as a model and an investigative tool. Addiction 102 (12), 1863 (2007).
6. Stefanski, R. et al., Active versus passive cocaine administration: differences in the neuroadaptive changes in the brain dopaminergic system. Brain Res 1157, 1 (2007).
7. Miguens, M. et al., Differential cocaine-induced modulation of glutamate and dopamine transporters after contingent and non-contingent administration. Neuropharmacology 55 (5), 771 (2008).
8. Palamarchouk, V., Smagin, G., and Goeders, N. E., Self-administered and passive cocaine infusions produce different effects on corticosterone concentrations in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) of rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 94 (1), 163 (2009).
9. Di Ciano, P., Blaha, C. D., and Phillips, A. G., Conditioned changes in dopamine oxidation currents in the nucleus accumbens of rats by stimuli paired with self-administration or yoked-administration of d-amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 10 (3), 1121 (1998).
10. Twining, R. C., Bolan, M., and Grigson, P. S., Yoked delivery of cocaine is aversive and protects against the motivation for drug in rats. Behav Neurosci 123 (4), 913 (2009).
11. Moolten, M. and Kornetsky, C., Oral self-administration of ethanol and not experimenter-administered ethanol facilitates rewarding electrical brain stimulation. Alcohol 7 (3), 221 (1990).
12. Schindler, C. W., Panlilio, L. V., and Goldberg, S. R., Second-order schedules of drug self-administration in animals. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 163 (3-4), 327 (2002).
13. O'Dell, L. E., Khroyan, T. V., and Neisewander, J. L., Dose-dependent characterization of the rewarding and stimulant properties of cocaine following intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 123 (2), 144 (1996).
14. Liu, Y., Roberts, D. C., and Morgan, D., Sensitization of the reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rats: effects of dose and intravenous injection speed. Eur J Neurosci 22 (1), 195 (2005).