Importance of urinary flow studies after hypospadias repair: A systematic review

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 757-761

  González, Ricardo ^a,b   Ludwikowski, Barbara M ^a  

^a Children's Hospital   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Hypospadias; Urethral obstruction; Urinary flow

Indexed keywords

BECK TECHNIQUE; CHILD REARING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; HYPOSPADIAS; INCISION; INFANCY; MEATAL ADVANCEMENT AND GLANULOPLASTY; MICTURITION; NOMOGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UROFLOWMETRY;

HUMANS; HYPOSPADIAS; MALE; RHEOLOGY; URETHRA; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 80355124315     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02839.x     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Weber DM, Schönbucher VB, Landolt MA etal. The Pediatric Penile Perception Score: an instrument for patient self-assessment and surgeon evaluation after hypospadias repair. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 1080-4.
2. Holland AJ, Smith GH, Ross FI etal. HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery. BJU Int. 2001; 88: 255-8.
3. Erickson BA, McAninch JW. The use of uroflowmetry to diagnose recurrent stricture after urethral reconstructive surgery. Urology 2010; 184: 1386-90.
4. Page E, Akin Y. Assessment of urine flow in hypospadias. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1978; 31: 313-16.
5. Scarpa MG, Castagnetti M, Berrettini A etal. Urinary function after Snodgrass repair of distal hypospadias: comparison with the Mathieu repair. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2010; 26: 519-22.
6. Braga LH, Pippi Salle JL, Lorenzo AJ etal. Comparative analysis of tubularized incised plate versus onlay island flap urethroplasty for penoscrotal hypospadias. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 1451-7.
7. Burgu B, Aydogdu O, Söylemez H etal. Both dorsal and ventral flaps can be used in previously circumcised hypospadic adults with comparable success rates. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2010; 42: 689-95.
8. Wolffenbuttel KP, Wondergem N, Hoefnagels JJS etal. Abnormal urine flow in boys with distal hypospadias before and after correction. J. Urol. 2006; 176: 1733-7.
9. Olsen LH, Grothe I, Rawashdeh YF etal. Urinary flow patterns in infants with distal hypospadias. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2011; 7: 428-32.
10. Tuygun C, Bakirtas H, Gucuk A etal. Uroflow findings in older boys with tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty. Urol. Int. 2009; 82: 71-6.
11. Malyon AD, Boorman J, Bowley N. Urinary flow rates in hypospadias. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1997; 50: 530-5.
12. Hammouda HM, El-Ghoneimi A, Bagli DJ etal. Tubularized incised plate repair: functional outcome after intermediate followup. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 331-3.
13. Andersson M, Doroszkiewicz M, Arfwidsson C etal. Hypospadias repair with tubularized incised plate: does the obstructive flow pattern resolve spontaneously? J. Pediatr. Urol. 2011; 7: 441-5.
14. Holmdahl G, Karström L, Abrahamsson K etal. Hypospadias repair with tubularized incised plate. Is uroflowmetry necessary postoperatively? J. Pediatr. Urol. 2006; 2: 304-7.
15. Kaya C, Kucuk E, Ilktac A etal. Value of uinary flow patterns in the follow-up of children who underwent Snodgrass operation. Urol. Int. 2007; 78: 245-8.
16. Marte A, Di Iorio G, De Pasquale M etal. Functional evaluation of tubularizedincised plate repair of midshaft-proximal hypospadias using uroflowmetry. BJU Int. 2001; 87: 540-3.
17. Saggiomo G, Di Meglio D, Di Iorio G etal. Il valore della uroflussometria nel follow-up a lungo termine della chirurgia dell'ipospadia. Minerva Pediatr. 1998; 50: 461-5.
18. Garignon C, Chamond C, Lefébure B etal. Evaluation functionell par débimetrie de l'urétroplastie de Duplay modifiée dans la chirurgie de l'hypospade. Prog. Urol. 2004; 14: 1199-202.
19. Garibay JT, Reid C, Gonzalez R. Functional evaluation of the results of hypospadias surgery with uroflowmetry. J. Urol. 1995; 154: 835-6.
20. Rynja S, Wouters GA, Van Schaijk M etal. Long-term followup of hypospadias: functional and cosmetic results. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 1736-43.
21. MacMillan R, Churchill B, Gilmour R. Assessment of urinary stream after repair of anterior hypospadias by meatoplasty and glanuloplasty. J. Urol. 1985; 134: 100-2.
22. Haberlik A, Schmidt B, Uray E etal. Hypospadias repair using a modification of Beck's operation: followup. J. Urol. 1997; 157: 2308-11.
23. Reid L, Curnier A, Stevenson J. Objective outcome assessment of the modified Bretteville technique. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2010; 63: 398-403.
24. Anwar A, Kurokawa Y, Takahashi M. Functional evaluation of one-stage urethroplasty with parameatal foreskin flaps repair of hypospadias using uroflowmetry. Int. J. Urol. 2003; 10: 297-301.
25. Jayanthi V, Mclorie GA, Khjoury AE etal. Functional characteristics of the reconstructed neourethra after island flap urethroplasty. J. Urol. 1995; 153: 1657-9.
26. Al-Sayyad A, Pike J, Leonard MP. Redo hypospadias repair: experience at a tertiary care children's hospital. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2007; 1: 47-51.
27. Idzenga T, Kok DJ, Pel JJM etal. Is the impaired flow after hypospadias correction due to increased urethral stiffness? J. Pediatr. Urol. 2006; 2: 299-303.
28. Hayashi Y, Kojima Y. Current concepts in hypospadias surgery. Int. J. Urol. 2008; 15: 651-64.