Long-term followup of hypospadias: Functional and cosmetic results

Journal of Urology

Volumn 182, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2009, Pages 1736-1743

  Rynja, Sybren P ^a   Wouters, Gerlof A ^a   Van Schaijk, Maaike ^a   Kok, Esther T ^a   De Jong, Tom P ^a   De Kort, Laetitia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hypospadias; Penis; Questionnaires; Sexuality; Urination

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ESTHETICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPOSPADIAS; MALE; MICTURITION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUALITY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URODYNAMICS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ESTHETICS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPOSPADIAS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEXUALITY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINATION; URODYNAMICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350500466     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.073     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Nuininga JE, de Gier RP, Verschuren R et al: Long-term outcome of different types of 1-stage hypospadias repair. J Urol 2005; 174: 1544.
2. Chrzan R, Dik P, Klijn AJ et al: Quality assessment of hypospadias repair with emphasis on techniques used and experience of pediatric urologic surgeons. Urology 2007; 70: 148.
3. Moriya K, Kakizaki H, Tanaka H et al: Long-term patient-reported outcome of urinary symptoms after hypospadias surgery: norm-related study in adolescents. J Urol 2007; 178: 1659.
4. Aho MO, Tammela OK, Somppi EM et al: Sexual and social life of men operated in childhood for hypospadias and phimosis. A comparative study Eur Urol 2000; 37: 95.
5. Moriya K, Kakizaki H, Tanaka H et al: Long-term cosmetic and sexual outcome of hypospadiassurgery: norm-related study in adolescence. J Urol 2006; 176: 1889.
6. Gurdal M, Tekin A, Kirecci S et al: Intermediate-term functional and cosmetic results of the Snodgrass procedure in distal and midpenile hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 197.
7. Nelson CP, Bloom DA, Kinast R et al: Long-term patient reported outcome and satisfaction after oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for hypospadias. J Urol 2005; 174: 1075.
8. Nelson CP, Bloom DA, Kinast R et al: Patient-reported sexual function after oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for hypospadias. Urology 2005; 66: 1086.
9. Mureau MA, Slijper FM, van der Meulen JC et al: Psychosexual adjustment of men who underwent hypospadias repair: a norm-related study. J Urol 1995; 154: 1351.
10. de Jong TP and Boemers TM: Improved Mathieu repair for coronal and distal shaft hypospadias with moderate chordee. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 972.
11. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP et al: The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 1992; 148: 1549.
12. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G et al: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822.
13. NRV Handleiding Nederlandse Relatievragenlijst. Lisse, The Netherlands: Lisse, Swets and Zeitlinger 2003.
14. Pernkopf D, Plas E, Lang T et al: Uroflow nomogram for male adolescents. J Urol 2005; 174: 1436.
15. Weber DM, Schönbucher VB, Landolt MA et al: The Pediatric Penile Perception Score: an instrument for patient self-assessment and surgeon evaluation after hypospadias repair. J Urol 2008; 180: 1080.
16. Patel RP, Shukla AR and Snyder HM III: The island tube and island onlay hypospadias repairs offer excellent long-term outcomes: a 14-year follow-up. J Urol 2004; 172: 1717.
17. Abrams P: In support of pressure-flow studies for evaluating men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 1994; 44: 153.
18. de Boer BJ, Bots ML, Lycklama a Nijeholt AA et al: Erectile dysfunction in primary care: prevalence and patient characteristics The ENIGMA study. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 358.
19. Bubanj TB, Perovic SV, Milicevic RM et al: Sexual behavior and sexual function of adults after hypospadias surgery: a comparative study. J Urol 2004; 171: 1876.
20. Herleen, The Netherlands: Centraal Bureau Statistiek 2006.