Functional evaluation of one-stage urethroplasty with parameatal foreskin flaps repair of hypospadias using uroflowmetry

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 297-301

  Anwar, Ahmed ^a   Kurokawa, Yasushi ^a,b   Takahashi, Masayuki ^a   Yamamoto, Yasuyo ^a   Kanayama, Hiro Omi ^a   Kagawa, Susumu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hypospadias; OUPF; Uroflowmetry

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FLOW RATE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPOSPADIAS; INGUINAL FLAP; MALE; NOMOGRAM; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREPUCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETHRA STRICTURE; URETHROPLASTY; UROFLOWMETRY;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DILATATION; DIURESIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPOSPADIAS; MALE; PENIS; RHEOLOGY; SURGICAL FLAPS; URETHRA; URETHRAL STRICTURE; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 0038460641     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00636.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sweet RA, Schrott HG, Kurland R, Culp OS. Study of the incidence of hypospadias in Rochester Minnesota, 1940-70 and case control comparison of possible etiologic factors. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1974; 49: 52-9.
2. Goepel M, Otto T, Kropfl D, Rubben H. Recent considerations for hypospadias repair: results of 252 operations from 1985 to 1990. Eur. Urol. 1996; 29: 63-6.
3. Belman AB. Hypospadias and other urethral abnormalities. In: Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB (eds). Clinical Pediatric Urology, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1992; 619-60.
4. Belman AB. Hypospadias update. Urol. 1997; 49: 166-72.
5. Garibay GT, Reid C, Gonzalez R. Functional evaluation of the results of hypospadias surgery with uroflowmetry. J. Urol. 1995; 154: 835-6.
6. Jayanthi RV, McLorie AG, Khoury AE, Churchill BM. Functional characteristics of the reconstructed neourethra after island flap urethroplasty. J. Urol. 1995; 153: 1657-9.
7. Werff JFA, Boeve E, Brusse CA et al. Urodynamic evaluation of hypospadias repair. J. Urol. 1995; 157: 1344-6.
8. Marte A, Di Iorio G, De-Pasquale M, Cortrufo AM, Di Meglio D. Functional evaluation of tubularized-incised plate repair of midshaft-proximal hypospadias using uroflowmetry. BJU. 2001; 87: 540-3.
9. Koyanagi T, Nonomura K, Yamashita T et al. One stage repair of hypospadias: is there is no simple method universally applicable to all types of hypospadias? J. Urol. 1995; 157: 1344-6.
10. Toguri GA, Uchida T, Bee DE. Pediatric uroflow rate nomograms. J. Urol. 1982; 127: 727-31.
11. Siroky MB. Interpretation of urinary flow rates. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 1990; 17: 537-42.
12. Retik AB, Keating M, Mandell J. Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol. Clin. N. Am., 1988; 15: 223-36.
13. Scherz HC, Kaplan GW, Patric MG, Brock WA. Posthypospadias repair urethral strictures: a review of 30 cases. J. Urol. 1988; 140: 1253-5.
14. Wese FX, Gaum LD, Liu TB et al. Body surface related flow rate nomograms in normal pediatric population. Acta Urol. Belg. 1989; 57: 467.
15. Du Bios EF. Basal Metabolism in Health and Disease, 3rd edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1936; 131.