Hierarchical titanium surface textures affect osteoblastic functions

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 99 A, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 666-675

  Zhao, Changli ^a   Cao, Peng ^b   Ji, Weiping ^a   Han, Pei ^a   Zhang, Jihong ^a   Zhang, Fan ^a   Jiang, Yao ^a   Zhang, Xiaonong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

nanostructured titanium; osteoblast behavior; surface characteristics; surface mechanical attrition treatment; titanium implant

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY; CELL ATTACHMENTS; CELLULAR ATTACHMENTS; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; IN-VITRO; METALLIC BIOMATERIALS; MICRO TOPOGRAPHY; MICRO-ROUGHNESS; MRNA LEVEL; NANO GRAINS; NANOSTRUCTURED TITANIUM; NOVEL METHODS; OSTEOBLASTIC FUNCTIONS; REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONS; ROUGH SURFACES; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; SURFACE ENERGY MEASUREMENTS; SURFACE MECHANICAL ATTRITION TREATMENT; SURFACE MECHANICAL ATTRITION TREATMENTS; TEXTURED SURFACE; TI-6AL-4V; TITANIUM IMPLANT; TITANIUM SURFACES;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; CONTACT ANGLE; GENE EXPRESSION; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; PHOSPHATASES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

TITANIUM;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTACT ANGLE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; HYDROPHILICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE ENERGY MEASUREMENT; SURFACE MECHANICAL ATTRITION TREATMENT; TENSILE STRENGTH; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ACTINS; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; COLLAGEN TYPE I; GENE EXPRESSION; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 80255138878     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33239     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK,. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants-A review. Progr Mater Sci 2009; 54: 397-425.
2. von Recum AF,. New aspects of biocompatibility: Motion at the interface. In:, Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, editors. Clinical Implant Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. p 297-302.
3. Cherhoudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM,. Effects of a grooved epoxy substratum on epithelial behavior in vivo and in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1988; 22: 459-477.
4. Liu X, Chu PK, Ding C,. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R 2004; 47: 49-121. (Pubitemid 40134426)
5. Ahmad M, McCarthy M, Grownowicz G,. An in vitro model for mineralization of human osteoblast-like cells on implant materials. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 211-220. (Pubitemid 29047965)
6. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A,. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 536-543. (Pubitemid 39360697)
7. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A,. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 544-564. (Pubitemid 39360698)
8. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A,. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 341-348. (Pubitemid 37141330)
9. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y,. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 844-854. (Pubitemid 46734313)
10. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T,. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: Surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 349-359. (Pubitemid 40905490)
11. Oshida. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007.
12. Deligianni DD, Katsata N, Ladas S, Sotiropoulou D, Amedee J, Missirlis YF,. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption Biomaterials 2001; 22: 1241-1251. (Pubitemid 32409945)
13. Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Schwartz Z., Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2219-2232. (Pubitemid 28550378)
14. Anselme K,. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 667-681. (Pubitemid 30109157)
15. Anselme K, Bigerelle M,. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater 2005; 1: 211-222. (Pubitemid 43348802)
16. Bachle M, Kohal RJ,. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 683-692. (Pubitemid 40115756)
17. Kim M-J, Kim C-W, Lim Y-J, Heo S-J,. Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 79: 1023-1032. (Pubitemid 44915921)
18. Saito T, Hayashi H, Kameyama T, Hishida M, Nagai K, Teraoka K, Kato K., Suppressed proliferation of mouse osteoblast-like cells by a rough-surfaced substrate leads to low differentiation and mineralization. Mater Sci Eng C 2010; 30: 1-7.
19. Sista S, Wen C, Hodgson PD, Pande G,. The influence of surface energy of titanium-zirconium alloy on osteoblast cell functions in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 97: 27-36.
20. Xiong JY, Li Y, Hodgson PD, Wen C,. In vitro osteoblast-like cell proliferation on nano-hydroxyapatite coatings with different morphologies on a titanium-niobium shape memory alloy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 95: 766-773.
21. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, M. dW, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J,. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 323-334.
22. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG., Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 529-533. (Pubitemid 41766080)
23. Eriksson C, Nygren H, Ohlson K,. Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: Cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4759-4766. (Pubitemid 38561163)
24. Faghihi S, Azari F, Zhilyaew AP, Szpunar JA, Vali H, Tabrizian M,. Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3887-3895. (Pubitemid 47048363)
25. Protivinsky J, Appleford M, Strnad J, Helebrant A, Ong JL,. Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 542-550.
26. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochram DL, Boyan BD., High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74: 49-58. (Pubitemid 41099250)
27. Schakenraad JM, Busscher HJ, Wildervuur CRH, Arends J,. The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 773-784. (Pubitemid 16093791)
28. Le Guehennec L, Lopez-Heredia M-A, Enkel B, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P,. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 535-543.
29. Park JW, Kim YJ, Park CH, Lee DH, Ko YG, Jang JH, Lee CS., Enhanced osteoblast response to an equal channel angular pressing-processed pure titanium substrate with microrough surface topography. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 3272-3280.
30. Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, Zhang Y, Wu Z,. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions Biomaterials 2010; 31: 5072-5082.
31. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1221-1227. (Pubitemid 29279815)
32. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 475-483. (Pubitemid 30452152)
33. Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4731-4739.
34. Ward BC, Webster TJ,. The effect of nanotopography on calcium and phosphorus deposition on metallic materials in vitro. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3064-3074. (Pubitemid 43247580)
35. Estrin Y, Kasper C, Diederichs S, Lapovok R,. Accelerated growth of preosteoblastic cells on ultrafine grained titanium. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 1239-12342.
36. Valiev R, Semenova IP, Latysh VV, Rack H, Lowe TC, Petruzelka J, Dluhos L, Hrusak D, Sochova J., Nanostructured titanium for biomedical applications. Adv Eng Mater 2008; 10: B15-B7.
37. Kim TN, Balakrishnan A, Lee BC, Kim WS, Dvorankova B, Smetana K,. In vitro fibroblast response to ultra fine grained titanium produced by a severe plastic deformation process. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 553-557. (Pubitemid 351244033)
38. Balasundaram G, Yao C, Webster TJ,. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanograined Ti modified with KRSR. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 80: 602-611. (Pubitemid 46239072)
39. Faghihi S, Zhilyaew AP, Szpunar JA, Azari F, Vali H, Tabrizian M,. Nanostructuring of a titanium material by high-pressure torsion improves pre-osteoblast attachment. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 1069-1073. (Pubitemid 46942269)
40. Lu K, Lu J,. Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 2004; 375: 38-45. (Pubitemid 38920973)
41. Zhang YS, Han Z, Wang K, Lu K,. Friction and wear behaviors of nanocrystalline surface layer of pure copper. Wear 2006; 260: 942-948. (Pubitemid 44275029)
42. Zhu KY, Vassel A, Brisset F, Lu K, Lu J,. Nanostructure formation mechanism of α-titanium using SMAT. Acta Mater 2004; 52: 4101-4110.
43. Huang L, Lu J, Troyon M,. Nanomechanical properties of nanostructured titanium prepared by SMAT. Surf Coat Technol 2006; 201: 208-213. (Pubitemid 44081077)
44. Wen M, Liu G, Gu JF, Guan WM, Lu J,. Dislocation evolution in titanium during surface severe plastic deformation. Appl Surf Sci 2009; 255: 6097-6102.
45. Cao P, Zhang XN, Zhang DL, Gabbitas B,. Mechanical compatibility of nanostructured titanium with human bone. Mater Sci Forum 2009; 618: 307-310.
46. Mordyuk BN, Prokopenko GI,. Fatigue life improvement of α-titanium by novel ultrasonically assisted technique. Mater Sci Eng A 2006; 437: 396-405. (Pubitemid 44529245)
47. Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Rubert M, Haugen HJ, Lyngstadass SP, Ellingsen JE,. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growh of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 736-742.
48. Guo J, Padilla RJ, Ambrose W, de Kok IJ, Cooper LF,. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5418-5425. (Pubitemid 47599637)
49. Good RJ, Girifalco LA,. A theory for estimation of surface and interfacial energies. III. Estimation of surface energies of solids from contact angle data. J Phys Chem 1960; 64: 561-565.
50. Cullity BD, Stock SR,. Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001.
51. Zhang XN,. Biomechanical and biocorrosion properties of nanostructured titanium. Adv Mater Res 2007; 29: 51-54.
52. Schrader ME,. On adhesion of biological substances to low energy solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 1982; 88: 296-297.
53. Schneider G, Burridge K,. Formation of focal adhesion by osteoblasts adhering to different substrata. Exp Cell Res 1994; 214: 264-269. (Pubitemid 24302401)
54. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, Natielia RR, Carter JM,. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: Methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18: 337-355. (Pubitemid 14101918)
55. Textor M, Sitting C, Frauchiger V, Tosatti S, Brunette DM,. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys. In:, Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in Medicine. New York: Springer; 2001. pp 172-230.
56. The Straumann SLA(R) Implant Surface: Clinically Proven Reduced Healing Time. Accessed from on 12 September 2011.
57. Scientific Review: Documentation on TiOblast. Accessed from on 12 September 2011.
58. Schwartz Z, Olivares-Navarrete R, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Boyan BD,. Mechanisms regulating increased production of osteoprotegerin by osteoblasts cultured on microstructured titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 3390-3396.
59. Tognarini I, Sorace S, Zonefrati R, Galli G, Gozzini A, Sala SC, Zappoli GD, Carossino AM, Tanini A, Mavilia C, Azzari C, Sbai F, Facchini A, Capanna R, Brandi ML., In vitro differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on Ti6Al4V surfaces. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 809-824. (Pubitemid 350266043)
60. Puzas J,. In:, Favus MJ, editor. Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism: Anatomy and Biology of Bone Matrix and Cellular Elements, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1993. p 15-21.