Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanograined Ti modified with KRSR

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 602-611

  Balasundaram, Ganesan ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a  

^a Brown University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion; KRSR; Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology; Osteoblast; Titanium

Indexed keywords

LYSINE ARGININE SERINE ARGININE (KRSR); ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS; OSTEOBLASTS; PROTEOGLYCANS;

ADHESION; CELLS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; ORTHOPEDICS; PROTEINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

TITANIUM;

HEPARIN; LYSYLARGINYLSERYLARGININE; NANOMATERIAL; NANOPARTICLE; PEPTIDE; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NANOFABRICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PARTICLE SIZE; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; SCANNING ELECTROCHEMICAL MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY; NANOPARTICLES; OLIGOPEPTIDES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TITANIUM;

EID: 33846927508     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30954     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Webster TJ. Nanophase ceramics: The future of orthopedic and dental implant material. In: Ying JY, editor. Nanostrucrured Materials. New York: Academic Press; 2001. pp. 125-166.
2. Sato M, Webster TJ. Nanobiotechnology: Implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004;1:105-114.
3. Kaplan FS, Hayes WC, Keaveny TM, Boskey A, Einhorn TA, Iannotti JP. Biomaterials. In: Simon SP, editor. Orthopedic Basic Science. Columbus, OH: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1994. pp. 460-478.
4. Kaplan FS, Lee WC, Keaveny TM, Boskey A, Einhorn TA, Iannotti JP. Form and function of bone. In: Simon SP, editor. Orthopedic Basic Science. Columbus, OH: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1994. pp. 127-185.
5. Webster TJ. Proteins: Structure and interaction patterns to solid surfaces In: Schwarz JA, Contescu C, Putyera K, editors. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005. (available on-line August 4).
6. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen AS, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. New York: Academic Press; 1996.
7. Sammarco VJ, Chang L. Modern issues in bone graft substitutes and advances in bone tissue technology. Foot Ankle Clin 2002;7:19-41.
8. Brunette DM. The effect of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;3:231-246.
9. Emery DFG, Clarke HJ, Grover ML. Stanmore total hip replacement in younger patients: Review of a group of patients under 50 years of age at operation. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79:240-246.
10. Hoexter DL. Bone regeneration graft materials. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:290-294.
11. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: Studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials 1994;15:1062-1074.
12. Sauberlich S, Klee D, Richter EJ, Hocker H, Spiekermann H. Cell culture tests for assessing the tolerance of soft tissue to variously modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:379-385.
13. Ferris DM, Moodie GD, Dimond PM, Gioranni CW, Ehrlich MG, Valentini RF. RGD-coated titanium implants stimulate increased bone formation in vivo. Biomaterials 1999;20:2323-2331.
14. Rezania A, Healy KE. Integrin subunits responsible for adhesion of human osteoblast-like cells to biomimetic peptide surfaces. J Orthop Res 1999;17:615-623.
15. Rezania A, Healy KE. Biomimetic peptide surfaces that regulate adhesion, spreading, cytoskeletal organization, and mineralization of the matrix deposited by osteoblast-like cells. Biotechnol Prog 1999;15:19-32.
16. Dee KC, Andersen TT, Bizios R. Design and function of novel osteoblast-adhesive peptides for chemical modification of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:371-377.
17. Hasenbein ME, Andersen TT, Bizios R. Micropatterned surfaces modified with select peptides promote exclusive interactions with osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2002;19:3937-3942.
18. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;3:291-301.
19. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;19:4731-4739.
20. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials 2004;18:4175-4183.
21. Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;70:129-138.
22. Chun AL, Moralez JG, Webster TJ, Fenniri H. Helical rosette nanotubes: A biomimetic coating for orthopedics? Biomaterials 2005;35:7304-7309.
23. Webster TJ, Smith TA. Increased osteoblast function on PLGA composites containing nanophase titania. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;744:677-686.
24. Balasundaram G, Sato M, Webster TJ. Using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and decreased crystallinity to promote osteoblast adhesion similar to functionalizing with RGD. Biomaterials 2006;14:2798-2805.
25. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;17:1803-1810.
26. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;13:1221-1227.
27. Durrieu MC, Pallu S, Guillemot F, Bareille R, Amedee J, Baquey CH, Labrugere C, Dard M. Grafting RGD containing peptides onto hydroxyapatite to promote osteoblastic cell adhesion. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;7:779-786.
28. Robinson KS, Sherwood PMA. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of the surface of sputter ion plated films. Surf Interface Anal 1984;6:261-266.
29. Callen BW, Lowenberg BF, Lugowski S, Sodhi RNS, Davies JE. Nitric acid passivation of Ti6A14V reduces thickness of surface oxide layer and increases trace element release. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:279-290.
30. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: Studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials 1994;15:1062-1074.
31. Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Bjursten LM, Ericson LE, Rosander L, Thomsen P. Preparation, surface spectroscopic and electron microscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. In: Ratner BD, editor. Surface Characterization of Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1988. pp 161-174.
32. McFarland CD, Thomas CH, DeFilippis C, Steele JG, Healy KE. Protein adsorption and cell attachment to patterned surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:200-210.
33. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-681.
34. Cavalcant-Adam EA, Shapiro IM, Composto RJ, Macarak EJ, Adams CS. RGD peptides immobilized on a mechanically deformable surface promote osteoblast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 2002;12:2130-2140.