Correction to: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (International Journal of Game Theory, (2011), 40, 4, (791-807), 10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z);Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

International Journal of Game Theory

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 791-807

  Bosmans, Kristof ^a,b   Lauwers, Luc ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adjusted proportional rule; Bankruptcy; Claims problem; Constrained egalitarian rule; Constrained equal awards rule; Constrained equal losses rule; Lorenz dominance; Minimal overlap rule; Piniles' rule; Proportional rule; Random arrival rule; Talmud rule; Taxation

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255127572     PISSN: 00207276     EISSN: 14321270     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00182-022-00807-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (16)

1. Bosmans K, Schokkaert E (2009) Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions. Soc Choice Welf 33: 533-557.
2. Chun Y, Thomson W (2005) Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims. Games Econ Behav 50: 129-142.
3. Chun Y, Schummer J, Thomson W (2001) Constrained egalitarianism: a new solution for claims problems. Seoul J Econ 14: 269-297.
4. Dominguez D, Thomson W (2006) A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. Econ Theory 28: 283-307.
5. Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42: 307-328.
6. Hougaard JL, Thorlund-Petersen L (2001) Bankruptcy rules, inequality, and uncertainty. Working Paper 4/01, Department of Operations Management, Copenhagen Business School.
7. Moreno-Ternero JD, Villar A (2004) The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards. Math Soc Sci 47: 245-257.
8. Moreno-Ternero JD, Villar A (2006) On the relative equitability of a family of taxation rules. J Public Econ Theory 8: 283-291.
9. Moulin H (2002) Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 289-357.
10. Schummer J, Thomson W (1997) Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy. Econ Lett 55: 333-337.
11. Sen AK (1973) On economic inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
12. Thomson W (2002) Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Mimeo.
13. Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45: 249-297.
14. Thomson W (2006) How to divide when there is not enough; from the Talmud to game theory. Unpublished book manuscript.
15. Thomson W (2011) Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Econ Theory. doi: 10. 1007/s00199-010-0575-5.
16. Thomson W, Yeh C-H (2006) Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Rochester Center for Economic Research Working Paper 531, University of Rochester.