Innate and evolutionarily increased advantages of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum over native E. japonicum under ambient and doubled atmospheric CO2 concentrations

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2703-2714

  Lei, Yan Bao ^a   Feng, Yu Long ^a   Zheng, Yu Long ^a,c   Wang, Rui Fang ^a,c   Gong, He De ^a,b,c   Zhang, Yi Ping ^a,b  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b Ailaoshan Station for Subtropical Forest Ecosystem Studies   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

CO2 enrichment; Defense; Evolution; Innate advantages; Invasiveness; Nitrogen allocation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CONSPECIFIC; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FUTURE PROSPECT; GROWTH RATE; INNATE BEHAVIOR; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIVE SPECIES; LEAF AREA; NITROGEN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SHRUB; VIGOR;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

AGERATINA ADENOPHORA; EUPATORIUM; EUPATORIUM JAPONICUM;

EID: 80255127456     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-011-9940-y     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. 2. New Phytol 165: 351-372.
2. Akinnifesi FK, Kang BT, Ladipo DO (1999) Structural root form and fine root distribution of some woody species evaluated for agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 42: 121-138.
3. Bauhus J, Messier C (1999) Soil exploitation strategies of fine-roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can J For Res 29: 260-273.
4. Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83: 887-889.
5. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
6. Caruso CM, Maherali H, Sherrard M (2006) Plasticity of physiology in Lobelia: testing for adaptation and constraint. Evolution 60: 980-990.
7. Colautti RI, Maron JL, Barrett SCH (2008) Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol Appl 2: 187-199.
8. Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (1995) Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, London.
9. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 183-211.
10. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invisibility. J Ecol 88: 528-534.
11. Evans JR, Seemann JR (1989) The allocation of protein nitrogen in the photosynthetic apparatus: costs, consequences and control. In: Brigs WR (ed) Photosynthesis. Liss AR, New York, pp 183-205.
12. Feng YL (2008a) Nitrogen allocation and partitioning in invasive and native Eupatorium species. Physiol Plant 132: 350-358.
13. Feng YL (2008b) Photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation and specific leaf area in invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and native Eupatorium japonicum grown at different irradiances. Physiol Plant 133: 318-326.
14. Feng YL, Auge H, Ebeling SK (2007) Invasive Buddleja davidii allocates more nitrogen to its photosynthetic machinery than five native woody species. Oecologia 153: 501-510.
15. Feng YL, Fu GL, Zheng YL (2008) Specific leaf area relates to the differences in leaf construction cost, photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation and use efficiencies between invasive and noninvasive alien congeners. Planta 228: 383-390.
16. Feng YL, Lei YB, Wang RF, Callaway RM, Valiente-Banuet A, Inderjit LiYP, Zheng YL (2009) Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1853-1856.
17. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M (2007) High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. Am J Bot 94: 526-532.
18. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159: 396-419.
19. 2 facilitate naturalization of the non-indigenous Prunus laurocerasus in Swiss temperate forests? Func Ecol 17: 778-785.
20. Hull-Sanders HM, Clare R, Johnson RH, Merer GA (2007) Evaluation of the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis: loss of defense against generalist but not specialist herbivores. J Chem Ecol 33: 781-799.
21. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Johnson MTL (2007) Genotype-by-environment interactions lead to variable selection on life-history strategy in Common Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis). J Evol Biol 20: 190-200.
23. Joshi J, Vrieling K (2005) The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol Lett 8: 704-714.
24. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 199-204.
25. Liang WS (2003) Drought stress increases both cyanogenesis and β-cyanoalanine synthase activity in tobacco. Plant Sci 165: 1109-1115.
26. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 603: 591-592.
27. Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Inv 8: 1535-1545.
28. 2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Environ 22: 1475-1495.
29. Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625-627.
30. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 417-422.
31. Niinemets U, Tenhunen JD (1997) A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant Cell Environ 22: 845-866.
32. Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13: 396-410.
33. 2 enrichment on the growth and morphology of a native and an introduced honeysuckle vine. Am J Bot 78: 69-75.
34. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2001) Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecol Lett 4: 514-518.
35. Smith JM, Arteca RN (2000) Molecular control of ethylene production by cyanide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 109: 180-187.
36. 2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408: 79-82.
37. 2 lowers relative and absolute herbivore density across all species of a scrub-oak forest. Oecologia 134: 82-87.
38. Takashima T, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2004) Photosynthesis or persistence: nitrogen allocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species. Plant Cell Environ 27: 1047-1054.
39. 2]- and density-dependent competition between grassland species. Global Change Biol 12: 2175-2218.
40. Willis CG, Ruhfel BR, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ, Losos JB, Davis CC (2010) Favorable climate change response explains non-native species' success in Thoreau's woods. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8878.
41. Zheng YL, Feng YL, Liu WX, Liao ZY (2009) Growth, biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive Eupatoriumadenophorum and its native congeners grown at different irradiances. Plant Ecol 203: 263-271.
42. Zou JW, Rogers WE, Siemann E (2007) Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium Sebiferum. Funct Ecol 21: 721-730.
43. Zou JW, Rogers WE, Siemann E (2009) Plasticity of Sapium sebiferum seedling growth to light and water resources: Inter- and intraspecific comparisons. Basic Appl Ecol 10: 79-88.