Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: The opinion of an observer neurologist;Hypersensibilité électromagnétique: Réflexions d'un observateur neurologue.

Comptes Rendus Physique

Volumn 11, Issue 9-10, 2010, Pages 564-575

  Marc Vergnes, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a CHU PURPAN   (France)

Author keywords

Clinical studies; EHS; Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Medically unexplained symptoms; Population studies; Provocation studies; Review

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951948184     PISSN: 16310705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crhy.2010.12.006     Document Type: Short Survey

References (82)

1. U. Bergqvist, E. Vogel (Eds.), Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report prepared by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DG V. Solna (Sweden), National Institute for Working Life, 1997.
2. K.H. Mild, M. Repacholi, E. van Deventer, P. Ravazzani, Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25-27, 2004, World Health Organization, 2006.
3. Lindén V., Rolfsen S. Video computer terminals and occupational dermatitis. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1981, 7:62-67.
4. Nilsen A. Facial rash in visual display unit operators. Contact Dermat. 1982, 8:25-28.
5. B. Knave, et al. "Hypersensibility to electricity" - a workplace phenomenon related to low frequency electric and magnetic fields, in: Worldwide Achievement in Public and Occupational Health Protection Against Radiation, vol II, Proceedings of the Eight International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, Montreal, Canada, 1992, pp. 1121-1124.
6. Frey A. Headaches from cellular phones: are they real and what are the implications?. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106:101-103.
7. Hocking B. Preliminary report: Symptoms associated with mobile phone use. Occup. Med. (Lond.) 1998, 48:357-360.
8. N. Irvine, Definition, epidemiology and management of electrical sensitivity, Report of the Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency, Ireland, 2005.
9. Crasson M. L'hypersensibilité à l'électricité: une approche multidisciplaire pour un problème multifactoriel. Revue de la littérature. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 2005, 55:51-67.
10. Seitz H., et al. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication - a literature review published between 2000 and 2004. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 349:45-55.
11. Hillert L., et al. Hypersensitivity to electricity: working definition and additional characterization of the syndrome. J. Psychosom. Res. 1999, 47:429-438.
12. Levallois P. Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: A review of the literature. Environ. Health Perspect. (Suppl. 4) 2002, 110:613-618.
13. Stenberg B., et al. Medical and social prognosis for patients with perceived hypersensitivity to electricity and skin symptoms related to the use of visual display terminals. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2002, 28:349-357.
14. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Proceedings of the International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity 2006, 2. Workshop summary, World Health Organization. K.H. Mild, M. Repacholi, E. van Deventer, P. Ravazzani (Eds.).
15. Hutter H.P., et al. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 63:307-313.
16. Eltiti S., et al. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:137-151.
17. Küçer N. Some ocular symptoms experienced by users of mobile phones. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2008, 27:205-209.
18. Rubin G.J., et al. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. J. Psychosom. Res. 2008, 64:1-9.
19. Johansson A., et al. Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. J. Psychosom. Res. 2010, 68:37-45.
20. Hillert L., et al. The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: an experimental provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29:185-196.
21. Thomas S., et al. Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults: a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry. Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29:463-470.
22. Thomas S., et al. Exposure to mobile telecommunication networks assessed using personal dosimetry and well-being in children and adolescents: the German MobilEe-study. Environ. Health 2008, 7:54-66.
23. Berg-Beckhoff G., et al. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009, 66:124-130.
24. Hüss A., et al. Symptoms attributed to the environment - a systematic, interdisciplinary assessment. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2004, 207:245-254.
25. Brand S., et al. Patients with environment-related disorders: comprehensive results of interdisciplinary diagnostics. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2009, 212:157-171.
26. Rubin G.J., et al. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom. Med. 2005, 67:224-232.
27. Röösli M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Environ. Res. 2008, 107:277-287.
28. Rubin G.J., et al. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensibility'): An updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2010, 31:1-11.
29. Mueller C.H., et al. Project NEMESIS: Perception of a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensity (laboratory experiment). Bioelectromagnetics 2002, 23:26-36.
30. A.P.M. Zwanborn, et al., Effects of global communication system radio-frequency fields on well being and cognitive functions of human subjects with and without subjective symptoms [Report], Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), The Hague, 2003.
31. Röösli M., et al. Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure - a questionnaire survey. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2004, 207:141-150.
32. Rubin G.J., et al. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomized provocation study. BMJ 2006, 332:886-889.
33. Eltiti S., et al. Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115:1603-1608.
34. Regel S.J., et al. UMTS base station-like exposure well-being, and cognitive performance. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114:1270-1275.
35. Heinrich S., et al. Elektromagnetische Felder einer UMTS-Mobilfunkbasisstation und möglische Auswirkung auf die Befindlichkait - eine experimentelle Felduntersuchung. Umwelt Med. Forsch. Prax. 2007, 12:171-180.
36. Boutry C.M., et al. Dosimetric evaluation and comparison of different RF exposure apparatuses used in human volunteer studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29:11-19.
37. Abdel-Rassoul G., et al. Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology 2007, 28:434-440.
38. Coggon D. Health risks from mobile phone base stations, Commentary on the paper by Hutter et al. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 63:298-299.
39. Wolf W.C., Vana N. No provable effects provable effects. http://oem.bmj.com/letters/submit/oemed;63/5/307?title=Re:No.
40. Röösli M., et al. Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol. Environ. Health 2010, 9:23.
41. Hillert L., et al. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2002, 28:33-41.
42. Levallois P. Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110(Suppl. 4):619-623.
43. Schreier N., et al. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Soz. Praventivmed. 2006, 51:202-209.
44. Schröttner J., Leitgeb N. Sensitivity to electricity - temporal changes in Austria. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:310-317.
45. Infas, Ermittung des Befürchtungen und Ängste der breiten Öffentlichkeit hinsichtlich möglicher Gefahren der hochfrequenten elektromagnetischen Felder des Mobilfunks: Abschlussbericht über die Befragung im Jahr 2006, Institut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaft, GmbH, Bonn.
46. Blettner M., et al. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009, 66:118-123.
47. Hallberg O., Oberfeld G. Letter to the Editor: Will we all become electrosensitive?. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2006, 25:189-191.
48. Mortazavi S.M., et al. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:326-330.
49. Lonne-Rahm S., et al. Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with "sensitivity to electricity". J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2000, 42:512-516.
50. Hillert L., et al. Environmental illness: fatigue and cholinesterase activity in patients reporting hypersensitivity to electricity. Environ. Res. 2001, 85:200-206.
51. Belyaev I.Y., et al. 915 MHz microwaves and 50 Hz magnetic field affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Bioelectromagnetics 2005, 26:173-184.
52. Markovà E., et al. Microwaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53BP1 and ?-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113:1172-1177.
53. Belyaev I.Y., et al. Microwaves from UMTS/GSM mobile phones induce long-lasting inhibition of 53BP1/gamma-H2AX DNA repair foci in human lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 2009, 30:129-141.
54. Berg M., et al. Facial skin complaints and work at visual display units: a histopathological study. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1990, 70:216-220.
55. Gangi S., Johansson O. A theoretical model based upon mast cells and histamine to explain the recently proclaimed sensitivity to electric and/or magnetic fields in humans. Med. Hypotheses 2000, 54:663-671.
56. Johansson O., et al. Skin changes in patients claiming to suffer from "screen dermatitis": a two-case open-field provocation study. Exp. Dermatol. 1994, 3:234-238.
57. O. Johansson, P.Y. Liu, "Electrosensitivity", "electrosupersensibility" and "screen dermatitis": preliminary observations from on-going studies, in: D. Simunic (Ed.), Proceedings of the COST 244: Biomedical Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Workshop on Electromagnetic Hypersensibility, Brussels/Graz EU/EC, DG XIII, pp. 52-57.
58. Johansson O., et al. Cutaneous mast cells are altered in normal healthy volunteers sitting in front of ordinary TVs/PCs - results from open-field provocation experiments. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2001, 28:513-519.
59. Johansson O. Electrohypersensibility: State-of-the-art of a functional impairment. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2006, 25:245-258.
60. O. Johansson, Evidence for effects on the immune system, BioInitiative, 2007 (Section 8).
61. Johansson O., et al. Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields - A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment. Pathophysiology 2009, 16:157-177.
62. Leitgeb N., Schröttner J. Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Bioelectromagnetics 2003, 24:387-394.
63. Schröttner J., et al. Investigation of electric current perception thresholds of different EHS groups. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:208-213.
64. Frick U., et al. Comparison perception of singular transcranial magnetic stimuli by subjectively electrosensitive subjects and general population controls. Bioelectromagnetics 2005, 26:287-298.
65. Landgrebe M., et al. Altered cortical excitability in subjectively electrosensitive patients: results of a pilot study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2007, 62:283-288.
66. Landgrebe M., et al. Cognitive and neurobiological alterations in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients: results of a case-control study. Psychol. Med. 2008, 38:1781-1791.
67. Sandström M., et al. Holter ECG monitoring in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2003, 49(3):227-235.
68. Wilén J., et al. Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 2006, 27(3):204-214.
69. D.W. Kim, et al., Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone, in: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008, pp. 2322-2325.
70. Andrzejak R., et al. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Industr. Health 2008, 46:409-417.
71. Landgrebe M., et al. Neuronal correlates of symptoms formation in functional somatic syndromes: a fMRI study. NeuroImage 2008, 2008:1336-1344. 10.1016/jneuroimage.2008.04.171.
72. Stenberg B. Facial skin symptoms in visual display terminal (VDT) workers. A case-referent study of personal, psycho-social, building and VDT related risk indicators. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 24:796-803.
73. Berg M., Bengt A. An occupational study of employees with VDU-associated symptoms: the importance of the stress. Stress Med. 1996, 12:51-54.
74. Bergdahl J., et al. Psychobiological personality dimensions in two environmental-illness patient groups. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2005, 9:251-256.
75. U. Frick, et al., Feasibility study: verification of the complaints of 'electro-sensitives' before and after reconstruction (Report on German), German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety, Berlin, 2004.
76. Schooneveld H., Kuiper J. Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) in the Netherlands. A Questionnaire Survey. Dutch Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) Foundation http://www.stichtingehs.nl/images/stories/EHS/ehs_in_the_netherlands_200 8.pdf.
77. Dahmen N., et al. Blood laboratory findings in patients suffering from self-perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). Bioelectromagnetics 2009, 30:299-306.
78. Rubin G.J., et al. A systematic review of treatments for electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Psychother. Psychosom. 2006, 75:12-18.
79. Oftedal G., et al. Skin symptoms after reduction of electric fields from visual display units. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1995, 21:335-344.
80. Oftedal G., et al. Long-term effects on symptoms by reducing electric fields from visual display units. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1999, 25:415-421.
81. Hillert L., et al. The effects of supplementary antioxidant therapy in patients who report hypersensitivity to electricity: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 3:12.
82. Nieto-Hernandez R., et al. Can evidence change belief? Reported mobile phone sensitivity following individual feedback of an inability to discriminate active from sham signals. J. Psychosom. Res. 2008, 65:453-460.