Do TETRA (Airwave) base station signals have a short-term impact on health and well-being? a randomized double-blind provocation study

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 735-741

  Wallace, Denise ^a   Eltiti, Stacy ^a,d   Ridgewell, Anna ^a   Garner, Kelly ^a   Russo, Riccardo ^a   Sepulveda, Francisco ^a   Walker, Stuart ^a   Quinlan, Terence ^a   Dudley, Sandra ^b   Maung, Sithu ^c   Deeble, Roger ^a   Fox, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Lensfield Medical Practice   (United Kingdom)

^d BIOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic fields; Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Electrosensitivity; Idiopathic environmental intolerance; Mobile phone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF REPORT; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; SYMPTOM; TELECOMMUNICATION; TERRESTRIAL TRUNKED RADIO TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WELLBEING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; DEVICES; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; RADIATION RESPONSE; RANDOMIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEART RATE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

EID: 77953279293     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: 15529924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901416     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Advisory Group on Non-Ionizing Radiation. 2001. Possible Health Effects from Terrestrial Trunked Radio (Tetra): Report of an Advisory Group on non-ionizing radiation: NRPB. Available: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1194947336937 [accessed 7 December 2009].
2. Airwave Health Monitoring Study. 2009. Airwave Health Monitoring Study Home Page. Available: http://www.police-health.org.uk/[accessed 15 July 2009].
3. Barker A, Jackson P, Parry H, Coulton L, Cook G, Wood S. 2007. The effect of GSM and TETRA mobile handset signals on blood pressure, catechol levels and heart rate variability. Bioelectromagnetics 28:433-438.
4. Belloul B. 2008. TETRA Base Station Emulator at the University of Essex Technical Reference Manual. Version 1.4. Colchester, UK:University of Essex.
5. Blettner M, Schlehofer B, Breckenkamp J, Kowall B, Schmiedel S, Reis U, et al. 2009. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany. Occup Environ Med 66:118-123.
6. Brosschot JF, Van Dijk E, Thayer JF. 2007. Daily worry is related to low heart rate variability during waking and the subsequent nocturnal sleep period. Int J Psychophysiol 63(1):39-47.
7. Challis L. 2005. Mechanisms for interaction between RF fields and biological tissue. Bioelectromagnetics 7(suppl):S98-S106.
8. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Ridgewell A, Zougkou K, Russo R, Sepulveda F, et al. 2007a. Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study. Environ Health Perspect 115:1603-1608.
9. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Zougkou K, Russo R, Joseph S, Rasor P, et al. 2007b. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 28:137-151.
10. Farrell N. 2002. UK Police Sick of TETRA Handsets. V3.co. uk 18 July. Available: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2119506/uk-police-sick-tetra-handsets [accessed 10 July 2009].
11. Green A, Scott I, Gwyther R, Peyman A, Chadwick P, Chen X, et al. 2005. An investigation of the effects of TETRA RF fields on intracellular calcium in neurones and cardiac myocytes. Int J Radiat Biol 81:869-885.
12. Hansson Mild K, Repacholi M, Van Deventer E, Ravazzani P, eds. 2006. Working group report. In: Proceedings, International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25-27, 2004 (Hansson Mild K, Repacholi M, van Deventer E, Ravazzani P, eds). Milan:World Health Organization, 15-26. Available:http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/EHS_Proceedings_June2006.pdf [accessed 1 July 2009].
13. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. 1998. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74:494-522.
14. Irvine N. 2005. Definition, Epidemiology and Management of Electrical Sensitivity: Report for the Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency. Available: http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1247816558210?p=1197637096018 [accessed 2 June 2009].
15. Kwon MS, Koivisto M, Laine M, Hämäläinen H. 2008. Perception of the electromagnetic field emitted by a mobile phone. Bioelectromagnetics 29:154-159.
16. Landgrebe M, Barta W, Rosengarth K, Frick U, Hauser S, Langguth B, et al. 2008. Neuronal correlates of symptom formation in functional somatic syndromes: a fMRI study. NeuroImage 41:1336-1344.
17. Lyskov E, Sandström M, Hansson Mild K. 2001a. Neurophysiological study of patients with perceived 'electrical hypersensitivity'. Int J Psychophysiol 42:233-241.
18. Lyskov E, Sandström M, Hansson Mild K. 2001b. Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics. Bioelectromagnetics 22:457-462.
19. Mann S, Cooper T, Allen S, Blackwell R, Lowe A. 2000. Exposure to Radio Waves near Mobile Phone Base Stations. Report no. NRPB-R321.Available:http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1194947399556 [accessed 3 June 2009].
20. Mortazavi SMJ, Ahmadi J, Shariati M. 2007. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students. Bioelectromagnetics 28:326-330.
21. NRPB (National Radiological Protection Board). 2001. Possible Health Effects from Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA): Report of an Advisory Group on Non-ionizing Radiation. Vol. 12, no. 2. Available:http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1194947336937 [accessed 7 December 2009].
22. Police Federation News. 2005. Airwave, Keeping the Lines of Communication Open? Available:http://www.polfed.org/PFNews_Airwave_Issue24.pdf[accessed 3 June 2009].
23. Regel S, Negovetic S, Röösli M, Berdiñas V, Schuderer J, Huss A, et al. 2006. UMTS base station-like exposure, well-being, and cognitive performance. Environ Health Perspect 114:1270-1275.
24. Rubin G, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. 2005. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom Med 67:224-232.
25. Rubin G, Hahn G, Everitt B, Cleare A, Wessely S. 2006. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ 332:886-891.
26. Rubin GJ, Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S. 2010. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 31:1-11.
27. Sandström M, Lyskov E, Hörnsten R, Hansson Mild K, Wiklund U, Rask P, et al. 2003. Holter ECG monitoring in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity. Int J Psychophysiol 49:227-235.
28. Valberg P, van Deventer E, Repacholi M. 2007. Workgroup report: base stations and wireless networks radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences. Environ Health Perspect 115:416-424.
29. Wechsler D. 1981. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York:Psychological Corporation.
30. Zwamborn A, Vossen S, van Leersum B, Ouwens M, Mäkel W. 2003. Effects of Global Communication System RadioFrequency Fields on Well Being and Cognitive Functions of Human Subjects with and without Subjective Complaints. Available:http://www.rivm.nl/milieuportaal/images/Zwamborn2003COFAMrapport.pdf [accessed 10 July 2009].