Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients

Academic Medicine

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1415-1421

  Jagsi, Reshma ^a   Decastro, Rochelle ^a   Griffith, Kent A ^b   Rangarajan, Soumya ^a,c   Churchill, Cristina ^d   Stewart, Abigail ^d   Ubel, Peter A ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255123406     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182305aa6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ley T, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: Build it and they will come. JAMA. 2005;294:1343-1351.
2. Schafer A, ed. The Vanishing Physician-Scientist? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2009.
3. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine: New insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:399-405.
4. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature-A 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:281-287.
5. Ley TJ, Hamilton BH. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science. 2008;322:1472-1474.
6. Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129: 532-538.
7. Hamel MB, Ingelfinger JR, Phimister E, Solomon CG. Women in academic medicine-Progress and challenges. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:310-311.
8. Collins KA. The CRISP system: An untapped resource for biomedical research project information. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989;77: 8-14.
9. Jagsi R, Motomura A, Griffith KA, et al. Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:804-811.
10. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1997.
11. Carr PL, Friedman RH, Moskowitz MA, Kazis LE. Comparing the status of men and women in academic medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:908-913.
12. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement-Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1282-1289.
13. Willis G. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2005.
14. National Institutes of Health. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm. Accessed July 28, 2011.
15. Davis SN, Greenstein TN. Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annu Rev Sociol. 2009;35:87-105.
16. Xie Y, Shauman K. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2003.
17. Roberson L, Kulik CT. Stereotype threat at work. Acad Manag Perspect. May 2007: 24-40.
18. Niederle M, Versterlund L. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Q J Econ. 2007;122:1067-1101.
19. Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Q J Econ. 2003;118:1049-1074.
20. Cole JR, Singer B. A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In: Zuckerman H, Cole JR, Bruer JT, eds. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York, NY: WWNorton; 1991:277-310.
21. Roberts T. Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychol Bull. 1991;109: 297-308.
22. National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; Institute of Medicine, Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
23. Steinpreis RE, Anders KA, Ritzke D. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles. 1999;41:509-528.
24. Martell RF, Lane DM, Emrich C. Male-female differences: A computer simulation. Am Psychol. 1996;2:157-158.
25. Valian V. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1998.
26. Sonnert G. What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists. Soc Stud Sci. 1995;25:35-55.
27. Long JS. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Soc Forces. 1992;71: 159-178.
28. Moskowitz DW, Suh EJ, Desaulniers J. Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:753-761.
29. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC. The leadership styles of women and men. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:781-797.