Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 151, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 804-811

  Jagsi, Reshma ^a,b   Motomura, Amy R ^a,c   Griffith, Kent A ^a,d   Rangarajan, Soumya ^a   Ubel, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CAREER; FEMALE; FEMALE PHYSICIAN; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

CAREER MOBILITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PREJUDICE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 71749103935     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Leadley J, Magrane D, Lang J, Pham T. Women in U.S. Academic Medicine Statistics and Benchmarking Report, 2007-2008. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2008. Accessed at www.aamc.org/members/gwims/ statistics/stats08/stats-report.pdf on 16 October 2009.
2. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:399-405. [PMID: 10666431] (Pubitemid 30084539)
3. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, Henault LE, Chang Y, Starr R, et al. The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature - a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:281-287 [PMID: 16855268]
4. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA. 1995;273:1022-1025 [PMID: 7897785]
5. Guelich JM, Singer BH, Castro MC, Rosenberg LE. A gender gap in the next generation of physician-scientists: medical student interest and participation in research. J Investig Med. 2002;50:412-418 [PMID: 12425427]
6. Office of Extramural Research. K Kiosk - NIH Extramural Training: Information about NIH Career Development Awards. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2009. Accessed at http://grants.nih.gov/training/ careerdevelopmentawards.htm on 16 October 2009.
7. Collins KA. The CRISP system: an untapped resource for biomedical research project information. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989;77:8-14. [PMID: 2720218]
8. Bruce ML. Challenges to the transition to independent investigator in geriatric mental health. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;11:356-359 [PMID: 12724115]
9. National Institutes of Health. NIH support to all institutions, fiscal year 2000. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2001. Accessed at http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/rnkall00.txt on 16 October 2009.
10. Office of Extramural Research. Success rates of NIH competing applications by funding institute/center, mechanism, and activity code: FY 2007-11997. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2007. Accessed at http://report.nih.gov/award/success/Success-All-2007.xls on 16 October 2009.
11. Office of Extramural Research. Women in Research: The Involvement of Women in NIH Extramural Research, Training, and Career Development Programs. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2008. Accessed at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/award/Research-Training-Investment/ WOMEN-IN-RESEARCH-2.ppt on 16 October 2009.
12. Ley TJ, Hamilton BH. Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science. 2008;322:1472-1474 [PMID: 19056961]
13. Hamel MB, Ingelfinger JR, Phimister E, Solomon CG. Women in academic medicine - progress and challenges [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:310-312 [PMID: 16855274] (Pubitemid 44079348)
14. Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, Scaramucci A, Barnett RC, Szalacha L, et al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:532-538 [PMID: 9758572] (Pubitemid 28460292)
15. Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Kallar S, Hampton C. Obstacles to promotion? Values of women faculty about career success and recognition. Committee on the Status of Women and Minorities, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus. Acad Med. 2000;75:283-288 [PMID: 10724319]
16. Brown AJ, Swinyard W, Ogle J. Women in academic medicine: a report of focus groups and questionnaires, with conjoint analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:999-1008. [PMID: 14709188] (Pubitemid 38072418)
17. Office of Extramural Research. Sex/gender in the biomedical science workforce. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2005. Accessed at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/sex-gender/q-a.htm on 16 October 2009.
18. Henderson L, Lee B, Marino A. Final Report on Three Focus Groups With Early Career Clinical Researchers About the K23 Award Program. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2001. Accessed at http://grants.nih.gov/training/ k23-report.pdf on 16 October 2009.
19. National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; and Institute of Medicine, Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2006.
20. Babcock L, Laschever S. Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Pr; 2003.
21. Bland CJ, Schmitz CC. Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. J Med Educ. 1986;61:22-31. [PMID: 3941419]
22. Aisenberg N, Harrington M. Women of Academe: Outsiders in the Sacred Grove. Amherst, MA: Univ of Massachusetts Pr; 1988.
23. Sirridge MS. The mentor system in medicine-how it works for women. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1985;40:51-53 [PMID: 3989206]
24. Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med. 1991;154:423-426 [PMID: 1877183]
25. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1282-1289 [PMID: 8857009]
26. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, Carr PL, Ash AS, Szalacha L, et al. Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:318-323 [PMID: 9526459] (Pubitemid 28128800)
27. Ramanan RA, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Silen W, Reede JY. Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction. Am J Med. 2002;112:336-341 [PMID: 11893387]
28. Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. JAMA. 2005;294:1343-1351 [PMID: 16174692]
29. Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D, Powers AC. Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med. 2003;51:149-156 [PMID: 12769197] (Pubitemid 36554773)
30. Donowitz M, Germino G, Cominelli F, Anderson JM. The attrition of young physician-scientists: problems and potential solutions. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:477-480 [PMID: 17258744] (Pubitemid 46274669)
31. Dickler HB, Fang D, Heinig SJ, Johnson E, Korn D. New physicianinvestigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species." JAMA. 2007;297:2496-2501 [PMID: 17565084]
32. Kotchen TA, Lindquist T, Miller Sostek A, Hoffmann R, Malik K, Stanfield B. Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications. J Investig Med. 2006;54:13-19 [PMID: 16409886] (Pubitemid 43172751)
33. Association of Professors of Medicine. Recommendations for Revitalizing the Nation's Physician-Scientist Workforce. Washington, DC: Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine; 2007. Accessed at www.im.org/PolicyAndAdvocacy/ PolicyIssues/Research/PSI/Documents/APM%20PSI%20Report.pdf.pdf on 16 October 2009.