Abundance thresholds and the underlying ecological processes: Field voles Microtus agrestis in a fragmented landscape

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 364-369

  Renwick, A R ^a   Lambin, X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agri environment schemes; Field margins; Habitat loss; Survival; Transience

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AGE STRUCTURE; AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEM; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; FIELD MARGIN; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; RODENT; SURVIVAL;

MICROTUS AGRESTIS; MURIDAE;

EID: 80155182090     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aars, J., Ims, R.A., 1999. The effect of habitat corridors on rates of transfer and interbreeding between vole demes. Ecology 80, 1648-1655.
2. Aars, J., Johannesen, E., Ims, R.A., 1999. Demographic consequences of movements in subdivided root vole populations. Oikos 85, 204-216.
3. Andreassen, H.P., Halle, S., Ims, R.A., 1996. Optimal width of movement corridors for root voles: not too narrow and not too wide. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 63-70.
4. Andreassen, H.P., Ims, R.A., 1998. The effects of experimental habitat destruction and patch isolation on space use and fitness parameters in female root vole Microtus oeconomus. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 941-952.
5. Bascompte, J., Solé, R.V., 1996. Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 465-473.
6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Dai, B., 2008. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, http://lme4.rforge.r-project.org/.
7. Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A., Wilson, J.D., 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 182-188.
8. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.G., 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA, USA.
9. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag.
10. Burthe, S., Telfer, S., Begon, M., Bennett, M., Smith, A., Lambin, X., 2008. Cowpox virus infection in natural field vole Microtus agrestis populations: significant negative impacts on survival. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 110-119.
11. Caughley, G., 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 215-244.
12. Chalfoun, A.D., Thompson, F.R., Ratnaswamy, M.J., 2002. Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conserv. Biol. 16, 306-318.
13. Choquet, R., Reboulet, A.M., Pradel, R., Lebreton, J.D., 2005. U-CARE 2.2. CEFE, Montpellier, France.
14. Crespin, L., Verhagen, R., Stenseth, N.C., Yoccoz, N.G., Prevot-Julliard, A.C., Lebreton, J.D., 2002. Survival in fluctuating bank vole populations: seasonal and yearly variations. Oikos 98, 467-479.
15. De'ath, G., Fabricius, K.E., 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81, 3178-3192.
16. Diffendorfer, J.E., Gaines, M.S., Holt, R.D., 1995. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus, and Peromyscus). Ecology 76, 827-839.
17. Donald, P.F., Green, R.E., Heath, M.F., 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 268, 25-29.
18. Fahrig, L., 1998. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecol. Model. 105, 273-292.
19. Fahrig, L., 2001. How much habitat is enough? Biol. Conserv. 100, 65-74.
20. Fahrig, L., 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487-515.
21. Fauske, J., Andreassen, H.P., Ims, R.A., 1997. Spatial organization in a small population of the root vole Microtus oeconomus in a linear habitat. Acta Theriol. 42, 79-90.
22. Firbank, L.G., Petit, S., Smart, S., Blain, A., Fuller, R.J., 2008. Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 363, 777-787.
23. Graham, I.M., 2002. Estimating weasel Mustela nivalis abundance from tunnel tracking indices at fluctuating field vole Microtus agrestis density. Wildlife Biol. 8, 279-287.
24. Griffiths, G.J.K., Winder, L., Holland, J.M., Thomas, C.F.G., Williams, E., 2007. The representation and functional composition of carabid and staphylinid beetles in different field boundary types at a farm-scale. Biol. Conserv. 135, 145-152.
25. Huggett, A.J., 2005. The concept and utility of 'ecological thresholds' in biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 124, 301-310.
26. Ims, R.A., Andreassen, H.P., 2000. Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds. Nature 408, 194-196.
27. Kuykendall, M.T., Keller, G.S., 2011. Impacts of roads and corridors on abundance and movement of small mammals on the Llano Estacado of Texas. Southwest. Nat. 56, 9-16.
28. La Polla, V.N., Barrett, G.W., 1993. Effects of corridor width and presence on the population dynamics of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Landscape Ecol. 8, 25-37.
29. Lande, R., 1987. Extinction thresholds in demographic-models of territorial populations. Am. Nat. 130, 624-635.
30. Lebreton, J.D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J., Anderson, D.R., 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 67-118.
31. Lindenmayer, D.B., Fischer, J., Cunningham, R.B., 2005. Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses. Biol. Conserv. 124, 311-316.
32. Marshall, E.J.P., West, T.M., Kleijn, D., 2006. Impacts of an agri-environment field margin prescription on the flora and fauna of arable farmland in different landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 113, 36-44.
33. Parker, M., MacNally, R., 2002. Habitat loss and the habitat fragmentation threshold: an experimental evaluation of impacts on richness and total abundances using grassland invertebrates. Biol. Conserv. 105, 217-229.
34. Pearson, S.M., Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., O'Neill, R.V., 1996. An organism-based perspective of habitat fragmentation. In: Szaro, R.C., Johnston, D.W. (Eds.), Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes. Theory and Practise Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 77-95.
35. Pradel, R., Hines, J.E., Lebreton, J.D., Nichols, J.D., 1997. Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53, 60-72.
36. R Core Development Team, 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Australia, http://www.r-project.org.
37. Radford, J.Q., Bennett, A.F., Cheers, G.J., 2005. Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biol. Conserv. 124, 317-337.
38. Rand, T.A., Tscharntke, T., 2007. Contrasting effects of natural habitat loss on generalist and specialist aphid natural enemies. Oikos 116, 1353-1362.
39. Simberloff, D., Cox, J., 1987. Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Cons. Biol. 1, 63-71.
40. Swift, T.L., Hannon, S.J., 2010. Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biol. Rev. 85, 35-53.
41. Tattersall, F.H., Macdonald, D.W., Hart, B.J., Johnson, P., Manley, W., Feber, R., 2002. Is habitat linearity important for small mammal communities on farmland? J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 643-652.
42. Therneau, T.M., Atkinson, B., 2008. rpart: Recursive Partitioning. R package version 3.1-41. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mayo/research/biostat/splusfunctions.cfm.
43. Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C., 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8, 857-874.
44. Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edition. Springer, New York.
45. Vickery, J.A., Bradbury, R.B., Henderson, I.G., Eaton, M.A., Grice, P.V., 2004. The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biol. Conserv. 119, 19-39.
46. White, G.C., 2008. Closed population estimation models and their extensions in program MARK. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 15, 89-99.
47. White, G.C., Burnham, K.P., 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, 120-138.
48. With, K.A., Crist, T.O., 1995. Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76, 2446-2459.
49. With, K.A., King, A.W., 1999. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Cons. Biol. 13, 314-326.