Closed population estimation models and their extensions in Program MARK

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-99

  White, Gary C ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Closed capture models; Detection probabilities; Encounter histories; Huggins models; Maximum likelihood estimation; Pledger models

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; EMIGRATION; ENCOUNTER RATE; IMMIGRATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MODELING; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION ESTIMATION; POPULATION SIZE; SOFTWARE; SURVIVAL;

OTIS; SCOMBEROMORUS SEMIFASCIATUS;

EID: 39049084203     PISSN: 13528505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10651-007-0030-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alho JM (1990). Logistic regression in capture-recapture models. Biometrics 46: 623-635
2. Brownie C, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Pollock KH and Hestbeck JB (1993). Capture-recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transitions. Biometrics 49: 1173-1187
3. Burnham KP and Anderson DR (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA
4. Carothers AD (1973). Capture-recapture methods applied to a population with known parameters. J Anim Ecol 42: 125-146
5. Chao A, Lee S-M and Jeng S-L (1992). Estimating population size for capture-recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal. Biometrics 48: 201-216
6. Hestbeck JB, Nichols JD and Malecki RA (1991). Estimates of movement and site fidelity using mark-resight data of wintering Canada geese. Ecology 72: 523-533
7. Huggins RM (1989). On the statistical analysis of capture-recapture experiments. Biometrika 76: 133-140
8. Huggins RM (1991). Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47: 725-732
9. Kendall WL and Nichols JD (1995). On the use of secondary capture-recapture samples to estimate temporary emigration and breeding proportions. J Appl Stat 22: 751-762
10. Kendall WL, Pollock KH and Brownie C (1995). A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design. Biometrics 51: 293-308
11. Kendall WL, Nichols JD and Hines JE (1997). Estimating temporary emigration using capture-recapture data with Pollock's robust design. Ecology 78: 563-578
12. Lukacs PM and Burnham KP (2005). Estimating population size from DNA-based closed capture-recapture data incorporating genotyping error. J Wildlife Manage 69: 396-403
13. Norris JL and Pollock KH (1996). Nonparametric MLE under two closed capture-recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics 52: 639-649
14. Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC and Anderson DR (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monogr 62: 1-135
15. Pledger S (2000). Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture-recapture models using mixtures. Biometrics 56: 434-442
16. Rexstad E, Burnham KP (1991) User's guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 29 pp
17. White GC (2000). Population viability analysis: Data requirements and essential analyses. In: Boitani, L and Fuller, TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology: Controversies and consequences., pp 288-331. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA
18. White GC and Burnham KP (1999). Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement): 120-138
19. White GC, Burnham KP, Otis DL, Anderson DR (1978) User's manual for program CAPTURE. Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA, 40 pp
20. White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory Rep. LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
21. White GC, Burnham KP and Anderson DR (2001). Advanced features of Program Mark. In: Field, R, Warren, RJ, Okarma, H, and Sievert, PR (eds) Wildlife, land, and people: Priorities for the 21st century. Proceedings of the Second International Wildlife Management Congress., pp 368-377. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA