Student experiences of creating and sharing material in online learning

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Potts, Henry W W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 80155182033     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610839     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L. 2008. The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 39:775-786.
2. Booth A. 2007. Blogs, wikis and podcasts: The 'evaluation bypass' in action. Health Inf Libr J 24:298-302.
3. Bruns A. Towards produsage: Futures for user-led content production. In: Sudweeks F, Hrachovec H, Ess C, editors. Proceedings of the culturalattitudes towards communication and technology, 2006 June 28-1 July, Tartu, Estonia, pp 275-284.
4. Bruns A. Produsage, Generation C, and their effects on the democratic process. In: Proceedings of the Media in Transition 5, 2007 April 27-29, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/ comm-forum/mit5/
5. Coldwell J, Craig A, Paterson T, Mustard J. 2008. Online students: Relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance. Electron J e-Learn 6:19-30.
6. Collis B, Moonen J. 2008. Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educ Media Int 45:93-106.
7. de Vaujany F-X. 2005. IT conceptualization: Respective contributions of sociology and information systems. J Inf Tech Impact 5:39-58.
8. Goth G. 2008. Are social networking sites growing up? IEEE Distrib Syst Online 9:3.
9. Greenhalgh T, Potts HWW, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D. 2009. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q 87:729-788.
10. Guthrie JT, Wigfield A, Barbosa P, Perencevich KC, Taboada A, Davis MH, Scafiddi NT, Tonks S. 2004. Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. J Educ Psychol 96:403-423.
11. Hammond M. 2005. A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. J Asynchronous Learn. Networks 9:9-23.
12. Harasim L. 2000. Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education 3:41-61.
13. Harden RM. 1986. Approaches to research in medical education. Med Educ 20:521-531.
14. Hmelo-Silver CE, Duncan RG, Chinn CA. 2007. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ Psychol 42:99-107.
15. Hughes B, Joshi I, Lemonde H. 2008. To 2.0 or Not to 2.0 - Have Junior Doctors Already Answered The Question? [Internet] Presentation at Medicine 2.0, Toronto, Canada, 5 Sep 2008. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Available from: http://www.medicine20congress.com/ocs/index.php/ med/med2008/paper/view/92 [Published Sep 2008]
16. Issroff K, Del Soldato T. Incorporating motivation into computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of European conference on artificial intelligence in education, (Brna P, Paiva A, Self JA, Editors), 1996 September 30-October 2, Ficha Tecnica, Lisbon. Lisbon, Portugal: Edições Colibri. JISC. Effective Practice in a Digital Age [Internet]. JISC Innovation Group, Bristol. [Published 2009]. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/ documents/publications/effectivepracticedigitalage. pdf
17. Jones A, Issroff K. 2005. Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput Educ 44:395-408.
18. Keen A. 2007. The cult of the amateur: How today's internet is killing our culture. New York (NY): Doubleday.
19. Kim JS. 2005. The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 6:7-19.
20. Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W. 2008. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 337:a567.
21. Penn State Learning Design Community Hub. January 2008. Online Discussion Questions [Internet]. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Available from: http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/crafting-question
22. Potts HWW. 2006. Is e-health progressing faster than e-health researchers? J Med Internet Res 8:e24.
23. Prensky M. 2006. Listen to the natives. Educ Leadership 63:8-13.
24. Riehle D. How and why Wikipedia works: An interview with Angela Beesley, Elisabeth Bauer, and Kizu Naoko. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on wikis, 2006 August 21-23. Odense, Denmark. New York: ACM Press. pp 3-8.
25. Sandars J. 2009. Developing competences for learning in the age of the internet. Educ Prim Care 20:337-422.
26. Sandars J, Homer M, Pell G, Crocker T. 2010. Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Med Teach Early Online:1-5.
27. Ward R. 2008. The Potential and Challenges of Web 2.0 in the Education of Healthcare Professionals [Internet]. Presentation at Medicine 2.0, Toronto, Canada, 4 Sep 2008. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Available from: http://www.medicine20congress.com/ocs/index.php/med/ med2008/paper/view/137
28. Ward R, Moule P, Lockyer L. 2009. Adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in education for health professionals in the UK: Where are we and why? Electron J e-Learn 7:165-171.