Driver behaviour during haptic and visual secondary tasks

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 121-127

  Rydström, Annie ^a   Grane, Camilla ^a   Bengtsson, Peter ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Driver distraction; Haptic information; In car interfaces

Indexed keywords

DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; DRIVER DISTRACTION; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; HAPTIC INFORMATION; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; IN-CAR INTERFACES; IN-VEHICLE; INTERACTION DEVICES; MENTAL WORKLOAD; SERIAL PROCESSING; VISUAL INFORMATION;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; INFORMATION USE; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 70350662572     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1620509.1620533     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I.S., 1996. Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 45, 483-493.
2. Bengtsson, P., Grane, C., Isaksson, J., 2003. Haptic/graphic interface for in-vehicle comfort functions - a simulator study and an experimental study, in: Proc. of the IEEE International Workshop on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Their Applications. Ottawa, Canada, pp. 25-29.
3. Burnett, G.E., Porter J.M., 2001. Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 55, 521-531.
4. Campbell, S.C., Shumin, Z., May, K.W., Maglio, P.P., 1999. What you feel must be what you see: adding tactile feedback to the Trackpoint, in: Sasse, M.A., Johnson, C. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction - Proceedings of INTERACT'99. IOS Press, Edinburgh, pp. 383-390.
5. Ernst, M.O., Bülthoff, H.H., 2004. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 4, 162-169.
6. Gentaz, E., Hatwell, Y., 2003. Haptic processing of spatial and material object properties, in: Hatwell, Y., Strieri, A., Gentaz, E. (Eds.), Touching for Knowing: Cognitive Psychology of Haptic Manual Perception. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 123-159.
7. Grane, C., Bengtsson, P., 2005. Menu selection with a rotary device founded on haptic and/or graphic information, in: Proc. of World Haptics 2005. Piza, Italy, pp. 475-476.
8. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E., 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, in: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 139-182.
9. Hatwell, Y., 2003. Introduction, in: Hatwell, Y., Strieri, A., Gentaz, E. (Eds.), Touching for Knowing: Cognitive Psychology of Haptic Manual Perception. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1-14.
10. Hayward, V., Astley, O.R., Cruz-Hernandez, M., Grant, D., Robles-De-La-Torre, G., 2004. Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Review 24, 16-29.
11. Ho, C., Tan, H.Z., Spence, C., 2005. Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transport. Res. F 8, 397-412.
12. Hollis, R., 2004. Haptics, in: Bainbridge, W.S. (Ed.), Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Berkshire Publishing Group, Great Barrington, pp. 311-316.
13. ISO 15007-1. Road vehicles - Measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems - Part 1: Definitions and parameters.
14. ISO 26022 (standard under development). Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Simulated lane change test to assess driver distraction.
15. Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., Summala, H., 1999. Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 31, 617-623.
16. Lee, J.D., Hoffman, J.D., Hayes, E., 2004. Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction, in: Proc. of CHI 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp. 65-72.
17. Loftus, G. R., Masson, M. E., 1994. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon. B. Rev. 1, 476-490.
18. Mattes, S., 2003. The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation, in: Strasser, H., Kluth, K., Rausch, H., Bubb, H. (Eds.), Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future. Ergonomia Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 57-60.
19. Moore, 1974. Tactile and kinaesthetic aspects of push-buttons. Appl. Ergon. 5, 66-71.
20. Oakley, I., McGee, M. R., Brewster, S., Gray, P., 2000. Putting the feel in 'look and feel', in: Proc. of CHI 2000. ACM Press, New York, pp. 415-422.
21. Porter, J.M., Summerskill, S.J., Burnett, G.E., Prynne, K., 2005. BIONIC - 'eyes-free' design of secondary driving controls, in: Proc. of the Accessible Design in the Digital World Conference. Dundee, UK.
22. Recarte, M.A, Nunes, L.M., 2003. Mental workload while driving: effects of visual search, discrimination, and decision making. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 9, 119-137.
23. Rydström, A., Bengtsson, P., 2007. Haptic, visual and cross-modal perception of interface information, in: de Waard, D., Hockey, G.R.J., Nickel, P., Brookhuis, K.A. (Eds.), Human Factors Issues in Complex System Performance. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp. 399-409.
24. Rydström, A., Bengtsson, P., Grane, C., Broström, R., Agardh, J, Nilsson, J., 2005. Multifunctional systems in vehicles: a usability evaluation, in: Thatcher, A., James, J., Todd A. (Eds.), Proceedings of CybErg 2005, the Fourth International Cyberspace Conference on Ergonomics. International Ergonomics Association Press: Johannesburg.
25. Sivak, M., 1996. The information that drivers use: is it indeed 90% visual? Perception 25, 1081-1089.
26. Strayer, D.L., Johnston, E.A., 2001. Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychol. Sci. 12, 462-466.
27. Van Erp, J., Van Veen, H., 2004. Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transport. Res. F 7, 247-256.
28. Victor, T.W., Blomberg, O., Zelinsky, A., in press. Automating driver visual behavior measurement. Vision in Vehicles 9.
29. Victor, T.W., Harbluk, J.L., Engström, J.A., 2005. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transport. Res. F 8, 167-190.
30. Vilimek, R., Hempel, T., Otto, B., 2007. Multimodal interfaces for in-vehicle applications. Lect. Notes. Comput. Sc. 4552, 216-224.
31. Wierwille, W., 1993. Demands on driver resources associated with introducing advanced technology into the vehicle. Transport. Res. C 1, 133-142.
32. Wikman, A.S., Nieminen, T., Summala, H., 1998. Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics 41, 358-372.
33. Zwahlen, H.T., Adams, C.C., Jr., DeBald, D.P., 1988. Safety aspects of CRT touch panel controls in automobiles, in: Gale, A.G., Freeman, M.H., Haslegrave, C.M., Smith, P.A., Taylor, S.P. (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 335-344.