Privatization and accountability

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2011, Pages 101-120

  Dickinson, Laura A ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contracting; military; oversight

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155160041     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131542     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Aman AC. 2004. The Democracy Deficit: Taming Globalization through Law Reform.New York: N.Y.Univ. Press
2. Asimow M. 1998. News from the states, the private due process train is leaving the station. Adm. Regul. Law News 23(Summer): No. 4. http://apps.americanbar.org/adminlaw/news/vol23no4/statenew.html
3. Avant DD. 2005. The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
4. Barak-Erez D. 1995. A state action doctrine for an age of privatization. Syracuse Law Rev. 45: 1169
5. Beermann JM. 2001. Privatization and political accountability. Fordham Urban Law J. 28: 1507
6. Bezdek BL. 2001. Contractual welfare: non-accountability and diminished democracy in local government contracts for welfare-to-work services. Fordham Urban Law J. 28: 1559
7. Brooks D, Laroia G. 2005. Privatized peacekeeping. Natl. Interest 80(Summer): 121-25
8. Brooks D, Shevlin J. 2005. Reconsidering battlefield contractors. Georget. J. Int. Aff. 6: 103
9. Chesterman S, Lehnardt C, eds. 2007. From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
10. Coglianese C. 2001. Administrative law. In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. NJ Smelser, PB Bates, pp. 85-88. Oxford: Elsevier
11. Coglianese C, Zeckhauser R, Parson E. 2004. Seeking truth for power: informational strategy and regulatory policymaking. Minn. Law Rev. 89: 277
12. Congr. Budget Off., US Congr. 2008. Contractors support of U.S. operations in Iraq, Publ. 3053. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/96xx/doc9688/08-12- IraqContractors.pdf
13. Cooper MH. 2004. Privatizing the military. CQ Res. 14: 565
14. Devine TM. 1999. The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989: foundation for the modern law of employee dissent. Adm. Law Rev. 51: 531
15. Dickinson LA. 2006. Public law values in a privatized world. Yale J. Int. Law 31: 383
16. Dickinson LA. 2011. Outsourcing War and Peace: Preserving PublicValues in an Era of ForeignAffairs Privatization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
17. Duffield M. 1998. NGO relief in war zones: toward an analysis of the new aid paradigm. In Beyond UN Subcontracting: Task-Sharing with Regional Security Arrangements and Service-Providing NGOs, ed. TG Weiss, pp. 139-59. London: Macmillan
18. Economist. 1995. Multinationals and their morals. Economist, Dec. 2, p. 18
19. Eggers WD. 1997. Performance-Based Contracting: Designing State-of-the-Art Contract Administration and Monitoring Systems. Los Angeles, CA: Reason Found.
20. Feiser CD. 1999. Privatization and the Freedom of Information Act: an analysis of public access to private entities under federal law. Fed. Commun. Law J. 52: 21
21. Freeman J. 2000. The private role in public governance. NYU Law Rev. 75: 543
22. Freeman J. 2003. Extending public law norms through privatization. Harvard Law Rev. 116: 1289
23. Freeman J, Minow M, eds. 2009. Government by Contract: Outsourcing and American Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
24. Gordenker L, Weiss TG, eds. 1996. NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publ.
25. Grant RW, Keohane RO. 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99: 29
26. Heen ML. 2004. Congress, public values, and the financing of private choice. Ohio State Law J. 65: 853
27. Horwitz JR. 2003. Why we need the independent sector: the behavior, law, and ethics of not-for-profit hospitals. UCLA Law Rev. 50: 1345
28. Iglehart JK. 1996. The national committee for quality assurance. N. Engl. J. Med. 335: 995
29. Isenberg D. 2010. Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq.Westport, CT: Praeger
30. Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974)
31. Johnson RN, Libecap GD. 1994. The Federal Civil Service System and the Problem of Bureaucracy: The Economics and Politics of Institutional Change. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
32. Karkkainen BC. 2001. Information as environmental regulation: TRI and performance benchmarking: precursor to a new paradigm? Georget. Law J. 89: 257 (Pubitemid 33651521)
33. Kelman S. 2002. Remaking federal procurement. Public Contract Law J. 31: 581
34. Kinney ED. 1994. Private accreditation as a substitute for direct government regulation in public health insurance programs. Law Contemp. Problems 57: 47
35. Lavery K. 1999. Smart Contracting for Local Government Services: Processes and Experience. Westport, CT: Praeger
36. Likosky MB. 2006. Law, Infrastructure and Human Rights. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
37. Lobel O. 2004. The renew deal: the fall of regulation and rise of governance in contemporary legal thought. Minn. Law Rev. 89: 342
38. Mashaw JL. 2006. Accountability and institutional design: some thoughts on the grammar of governance. In Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences, ed. MW Dowdle, pp. 115-56. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
39. Mazzetti M. 2010. US is still using private spy ring, despite doubts. New York Times, May 15. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/world/16contractors.html? hp
40. Merrill TW. 1997. Capture theory and the courts: 1967-1983. Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 72: 1039
41. Metzger GE. 2009. Private delegations, due process, and the duty to supervise. See Freeman & Minow 2009, pp. 291-309
42. Milliard TS. 2003. Overcoming post-colonial myopia: a call to recognize and regulate private military companies. Mil. Law Rev. 176: 1
43. Minow M. 2003. Public and private partnerships: accounting for the new religion. Harvard Law Rev. 116: 1229
44. Moore MH. 2003. Introduction. Harvard Law Rev. 116: 1212
45. Ratner SR. 2001. Corporations and human rights: a theory of legal responsibility. Yale Law J. 111: 443
46. Sabatino JM. 1997. Privatization and punitives: should government contractors share the sovereigns immunities from exemplary damages? Ohio State Law J. 58: 175
47. Scahill J. 2007. Blackwater: The Rise of the Worlds Most Powerful Mercenary Army. New York: Nation Books
48. Schwartz M. 2010. Department of Defenses Use of Private Security Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Background, Analysis, and Options for Congress. Washington, DC: Congr. Res. Serv. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/ R40835.pdf
49. Singer PW. 2003. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
50. Smillie I. 1999. At sea in a sieve? Trends and issues in the relationship between northern NGOs and northern governments. In Stakeholders: Government-NGO Partnerships for International Development, ed. I Smillie, H Helmich, pp. 7-35. London: Earthscan
51. Stewart RB, Sunstein C. 1982. Public programs and private rights. Harvard Law Rev. 95: 1193
52. Symposium: public values in an era of privatization. 2003. Harvard Law Rev. 116: 1211
53. Trebilcock MJ, Iacobucci EM. 2003. Privatization and accountability. Harvard Law Rev. 116: 1422
54. Vaughn RG. 1999. State whistleblower statutes and the future of whistleblower protection. Adm. Law Rev. 51: 581
55. Verkuil PR. 2007. Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What We Can Do About It. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
56. Weber M. 2004. Politics as a vocation. In The Vocation Lectures, ed.DOwen, TB Strong, transl. R Livingstone, pp. 32-94. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett
57. Weiss TG, ed. 1998. Beyond U.N. Subcontracting: Task-Sharing with Regional Security Arrangements and Service-Providing NGOs. London: Macmillan
58. Weissbrodt D, KrugerM. 2003. Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. Am. J. Int. Law 97: 901
59. Weyrauch WO, Bell MA. 1993. Autonomous lawmaking: the case of the "gypsies." Yale Law J. 103: 330
60. Zarate JC. 1998. The emergence of a new dog of war: private international security companies, international law, and the new world disorder. Stanford J. Int. Law. 34: 75