Perceptual models of viewpoint preference

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Secord, Adrian ^a   Lu, Jingwan ^b   Finkelstein, Adam ^b   Singh, Manish ^c   Nealen, Andrew ^c  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Camera control; User interfaces; User study; Viewpoint selection; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

3D OBJECT; CAMERA CONTROLS; GENERAL MODEL; PERCEPTUAL MODEL; TRACKBALLS; USER STUDY; VIEW SELECTION; VIEWPOINT SELECTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

CAMERAS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER VISION; OPTIMIZATION; USER INTERFACES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 80155142251     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2019627.2019628     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. 3DS MAX. 2010. Autodesk, http://www.autodesk.com/3dsmax.
2. ATTNEAVE, F. 1954. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psych. Rev. 61, 3, 183-193.
3. BARRAL, P., DORME, G., AND PLEMENOS, D. 2000. Visual understanding of a scene by automatic movement of a camera, short paper. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Conference 2000.
4. BIEDERMAN, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psych. Rev. 94, 115-147.
5. BLANZ, V., VETTER, T., BÜLTHOFF, H., AND TARR, M. 1999. What object attributes determine canonical views? Percept. 24, 575-599.
6. BRADLEY, R. AND TERRY, M. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, i. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 324-345.
7. BYERS, Z., DIXON, M., GOODIER, K., GRIMM, C., AND SMART, W. 2003. An autonomous robot photographer. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 3, 2636-2641, vol. 3.
8. CHRISTIE, M., OLIVIER, P., AND NORMAND, J.-M. 2008. Camera control in computer graphics. Comput. Graph. Forum 27, 8, 2197-2218.
9. COLE, F., SANIK, K., DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., FUNKHOUSER, T., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND SINGH, M. 2009. How well do line drawings depict shape? ACM Trans. Graph. 28.
10. COMANICIU, D. AND MEER, P. 2002. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 5, 603-619. (Pubitemid 34550429)
11. DAVID, H. A. 1963. The Method of Paired Comparison. Hafner Publishing.
12. DOWNS, J. S., HOLBROOK, M. B., SHENG, S., AND CRANOR, L. F. 2010. Are your participants gaming the system?: Screening mechanical turk workers. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2399-2402.
13. DRUCKER, S. AND ZELTZER, D. 1995. Camdroid: A system for implementing intelligent camera control. InProceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. 139-144.
14. FELDMAN, J. AND SINGH, M. 2005. Information along contours and object boundaries. Psych. Rev. 112, 243-252. (Pubitemid 40131527)
15. FIX, E. AND HODGES, J. 1951. Discriminatory analysis, nonparametric discrimination: Consistency properties. Tech. rep. 4, USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas.
16. FLEISHMAN, S., COHEN-OR, D., AND LISCHINSKI, D. 1999. Automatic camera placement for image-based modeling. Comput. Graph. Forum 19, 12-20.
17. FU, H., COHEN-OR, D., DROR, G., AND SHEFFER, A. 2008. Upright orientation of man-made objects. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3, 42:1-42:7.
18. GOOCH, B., REINHARD, E., MOULDING, C., AND SHIRLEY, P. 2001. Artistic composition for image creation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 83-88.
19. GOOGLE. 2010. Google 3D warehouse and SketchUp. http://sketchup. google.com/3dwarehouse/.
20. HEER, J. AND BOSTOCK, M. 2010. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction (CHI'10).
21. HOFFMAN, D. D. AND SINGH, M. 1997. Salience of visual parts. Cogn. 63, 1, 29-78. (Pubitemid 127450466)
22. HSU, J. 1996. Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
23. KAMADA, T. AND KAWAI, S. 1988. A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 41, 1, 43-56. (Pubitemid 18548242)
24. KASS, M., WITKIN, A., AND TERZOPOULOS, D. 1988. Snakes: Active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1, 4, 321-331.
25. KOENDERINK, J. AND DOORN, A. V. 1979. The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biol. Cybern. 32, 211-216. (Pubitemid 9178082)
26. KWON, J. AND LEE, I. 2008. Determination of camera parameters for character motions using motion area. Vis. Comput. 24, 7, 475-483.
27. LAGA, H. AND NAKAJIMA, M. 2008. Supervised learning of salient 2D views of 3D models. J. Soc. Art Sci. 7, 4, 124-131.
28. LEE, C. H., VARSHNEY, A., AND JACOBS, D. W. 2005. Mesh saliency. ACM SIGGRAPH'05 Papers. 659-666.
29. MAYA. 2010. Autodesk. http://www.autodesk.com/maya.
30. MEYER, M., DESBRUN, M., SCHRÖDER, P., AND BARR, A. 2002. Discrete differential-geometry operators for triangulated 2-manifolds. In Proceedings of VisMath'02.
31. NELDER, J. A. AND MEAD, R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308-313.
32. PAGE, D., KOSCHAN, A., SUKUMAR, S., ROUI-ABIDI, B., AND ABIDI, M. 2003. Shape analysis algorithm based on information theory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'03) 1. 29-32.
33. PALMER, S., ROSCH, E., AND CHASE, P. 1981. Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. Atten. Perform. IX, 135-151.
34. PLEMENOS, D. AND BENAYADA, M. 1996. Intelligent display in scene modeling: New techniques to automatically compute good views. In Proceedings of GraphiCon (Conference).
35. PODOLAK, J., SHILANE, P., GOLOVINSKIY, A., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND FUNKHOUSER, T. 2006. A planar-reflective symmetry transform for 3D shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3.
36. POLONSKY, O., PATANE, G., BIASOTTI, S., GOTSMAN, C., AND SPAGNUOLO, M. 2005. What's in an image: Towards the computation of the best view of an object. Vis. Comput. 21, 8-10, 840-847. (Pubitemid 41316208)
37. ROBERTS, D. AND MARSHALL, A. 1998. Viewpoint selection for complete surface coverage of three dimensional objects. In Proceedings of the Britsh Machine Vision Conference. 740-750.
38. SALEEM, W., SONG, W., BELYAEV, A., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2007. On computing best fly. In Proceedings of the 23rd Spring Conference on Computer Graphics. 143-149.
39. SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379-423.
40. SHILANE, P., MIN, P., KAZHDAN, M., AND FUNKHOUSER, T. 2004. The princeton shape benchmark. In Proceedings of the Shape Modeling International Conference.
41. SILVERMAN, B. AND JONES, M. 1989. E. Fix and JL Hodges (1951): An important contribution tononparametric discriminant analysis and density estimation: Commentary on Fix and Hodges (1951). Int. Statis. Rev. Int. Statis. 57, 3, 233-238.
42. SOKOLOV, D. AND PLEMENOS, D. 2005. Viewpoint quality and scene understanding. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST). 67-73.
43. STOEV, S. AND STRASSER, W. 2002. A case study on automatic camera placement and motion for visualizing historical data. In Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization.
44. VÁZQUEZ, P. AND SBERT, M. 2002. Automatic keyframe selection for highquality image-based walkthrough animation using viewpoint entropy. In Proceedings of the International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (WSCG'02).
45. VÁZQUEZ, P.-P., FEIXAS, M., SBERT, M., AND HEIDRICH, W. 2001. Viewpoint selection using viewpoint entropy. In Proceedings of the Vision Modeling and Visualization Conference (VMV'01). 273-280.
46. VIEIRA, T., BORDIGNON, A., PEIXOTO, A., TAVARES, G., LOPES, H., VELHO, L., AND LEWINER, T. 2009. Learning good views through intelligent galleries. Comput. Graph. Forum. 28, 2, 717-726.
47. WEINSHALL, D. AND WERMAN, M. 1997. On view likelihood and stability. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 19, 2, 97-108. (Pubitemid 127828326)
48. YAMAUCHI, H., SALEEM, W., YOSHIZAWA, S., KARNI, Z., BELYAEV, A., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2006. Towards stable and salient multi-view representation of 3d shapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications. 265-270.
49. ZHAI, S. 1998. User performance in relation to 3d input device design. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 32, 4, 50-54. (Pubitemid 128467795)
50. ZUSNE, L. 1970. Visual Perception of Form. Academic Press.